Mining Intelligence and News
United States

Nevada North Lithium Project

Click for more information

Categories

Summary

Mine TypeOpen Pit
Study CompletedPreliminary Economic Assessment
Commodities
  • Lithium
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Mine Life... Lock
SnapshotTo meet the surging demand for lithium from electric vehicles, battery energy storage, and high-tech industries like robotics and automation, Surge Battery Metals is responsibly advancing the Nevada North Lithium Project.

In 2025, Surge Battery Metals reported the results of Preliminary Economic Assessment Study (PEA) for the Nevada North Lithium Project.

The PEA scenario envisions 2 phases, with Phase 2 comes online in Year 4 of production.

The PEA confirms robust economics for a low-cost, large-scale and longlife operation producing battery-grade lithium carbonate through on-site treatment.
Latest NewsSurge Files Preliminary Economic Assessment For High-Grade Nevada North Lithium Project; Confirms Strong Economics     July 24, 2025

Owners

SourceSource
CompanyInterestOwnership
Surge Battery Metals Inc. 100 % Indirect
Surge Battery Metals Inc. owns the Nevada North Lithium Project.

Contractors

Lock

- subscription is required.

Deposit type

  • Sediment-hosted

Summary:

Deposit Types
Lithium-bearing clays at the Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP) share characteristics with the closed hydrologic system diagenesis (CHSD) model. A closed hydrologic system refers to a basin environment where hydrologic inputs are exceeded by evaporation. Closed hydrologic systems in the Great Basin are formed by either caldera collapse or divergent tectonic activity, both resulting in graben blocks suitable for lake formation. Hydrothermal circulation within the basin may contribute to the development of lithium-bearing claystone strata.

Property Area Geology
Outcrop exposures are rare in the main part of the property as the Tertiary basin-filling sediments and felsic ash fall tuffs are easily weathered and form rolling hills. Abundant sage scrub and juniper vegetation further conceal the surface rock units. A prominent exposure of felsic ash fall tuff (with possible fluvial scouring and re-working of certain beds) from 10 km west of the NNLP on BLM 1099 provides a suitable visual example.

Prominent outcrops of lithium mineralization-hosting claystone are rare and these stratigraphic units are best understood from core drilling. A hill that is capped by tuff unit Ty1 overlying lithium mineralized claystone unit Cu3 provided the best field example of claystone exposure during the site visit of October 8, 2024.

Regional mapping by Coats (1987) shows an undifferentiated package of Tertiary tuffs and sediments with the patch of flows and domes on the northeast comer. Mapping by Redfern (1977) used the older term "Idavada Formation to describe primarily the felsic flows and tuffs now more associated with the Cougar Point Tuff. The unit descriptions and measured sections by Redfern are still valid locally, as well as measured sections and age dates by Camilleri et. al. (2017). Redfern's Opal Springs Volcanic unit is likely a member of the Cougar Point Tuff but further work including radiometric age dating is needed to confirm this and place the subunits of the Opal Springs into the regional sequence.

There is a major change in the tuffs and clastic rocks in the Redfern measured sections in Texas Spring Canyon south of the Prince Mine and the dark claystone on the NNLP property. Tuffs in the eastern part of the canyon are nearly flat-lying while those on the property have a shallow west dip. The claystone units are not seen in the eastern part of the canyon, and stream sediment analyses suggest these rocks are devoid of significant lithium.

As known from core drilling, the sedimentary sequence in the main part of the property consists of a welded ash-flow tuff overlain by a sequence of interbedded clay-rich siltstone and shale punctuated by apparent air-fall tuff beds. The clay-rich sequence is capped by a layer of tuff and tuffaceous sediments with thin silicified beds. On the west and south, these rocks are covered with alluvial material derived from the Contact Pluton and associated metamorphosed Paleozoic metasedimentary rocks. A small igneous dome is found on the east and northeast edge of the claim block; the exact nature of the body is not well known but it appears to pre-date the mineralized claystone.

Mineralization is found in three distinct horizons of silty, weakly calcareous claystone with seams of blue-grey clay. The depositional environment is lacustrine. Rocks between the lithium mineralized claystones are mostly reduced felsic air fall tuffs and tuffaceous siltstone. Holes targeted completion in a basal coarse cobble to pebble conglomerate, ash flow tuff, or a Paleozoic phyllite. The lower tuff shows moderate propylitic alteration with replacement of mafic minerals by chlorite and disseminated pyrite. The basement in hole NNL-007 has coarse quartz and metamorphic rocks derived from the Contact Pluton and associated metamorphic rocks to the west. This would be consistent with a localized basin as proposed by Camilleri, et. al (2017).

In the northern part of the property, several white ash units form outcrops that cap the mineralized claystone. Superficially, these resemble the dated tuff beds in Bell Canyon measured and dated by Camilleri et al. (2017) and are exposed at a similar elevation. If these can be shown to be the same horizons, the host units (if not the mineralization in general) can be shown to have been laid down around 11 Ma.

Mineralization
In plan view, the northwest-southeast long dimension of the NNLP lithium inferred resource is 5.0 km. The widest portion is 2.8 km near the southern limit while the narrowest portion is 0.8 km near the northern limit.

Lithium mineralized claystone is typically olive green to dark green and may contain seams of a more intense blue-grey color. When wet, this clay is plastic with a potter's clay texture.

Visual clues to possible lithium enrichment in claystone include dominance of the clay fraction over the coarser clastic component in the claystone / siltstone, the presence of megascopic disseminated white calcite crystals, and the presence of thin silica lenses or laminae which can sometimes preserve trona crystals or crystal casts; Surge geologists interpret these lenses as indurated lakebed silica gel accumulations.

Preliminary screen testing of mineralized claystone demonstrates that 98% of the lithium endowment reports to the minus 200 mesh fraction (Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, 2023). While this observation supports the conclusion that lithium resides in clay mineral(s), neither the specific mineral species nor the preferred site(s) for lithium within the clay crystal lattice are known at present.

Enrichment in cesium and rubidium correlates strongly with lithium enrichment. Somewhat weaker positive correlation is seen for magnesium and boron. Tungsten shows positive correlation with lithium content only at highest lithium grades and preferentially in the claystones of the Upper Mineralized Sequence. A correlation of molybdenum with lithium content is weak and equivocal. There is no evidence of arsenic or antimony enrichment associated with elevated lithium content.

Reserves

Lock

- subscription is required.

Mining Methods

Lock

- subscription is required.

Required Heavy Mobile Equipment

Lock

- subscription is required.

Comminution

Crushers and Mills

Milling equipment has not been reported.

Processing

Lock

- subscription is required.

Commodity Production

CommodityProductUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Lithium Carbonate kt 3,626
LCE Payable metal kt 863,626

Operational metrics

Metrics
Annual ore mining rate  ....  Subscribe
Annual processing rate  ....  Subscribe
Annual processing capacity  ....  Subscribe
Stripping ratio  ....  Subscribe
Waste tonnes, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Total tonnes mined, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Tonnes processed, LOM  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study.

Production Costs

CommodityUnitsAverage
Cash costs LCE USD  ....  Subscribe
Assumed price LCE USD  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study / presentation.

Project Costs

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Sustaining CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Total CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
OP OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Processing OpEx $M USD 15,978
G&A costs $M USD 497.9
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Income Taxes $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Royalty payments $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Gross revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Net Income (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 8% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 8% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe

Personnel

Mine Management

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Sep 6, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required May 19, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required May 19, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Sep 6, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Jun 9, 2025

Workforce

EmployeesYear
...... Subscription required 2025

Aerial view:

Lock

- subscription is required.