Mining Intelligence and News
Argentina

Kachi Project

Click for more information

Categories

Summary

Mine TypeIn-Situ
Study CompletedFeasibility
StagePermitting
Commodities
  • Lithium
Mining Method
  • Brine mining
Project Timeline... Lock
Mine Life... Lock
SnapshotKachi Lithium Brine Project is ranks as one of the largest lithium assets in the Lithium Triangle.

DFS Addendum 2025 presents an update to the Original DFS (2023), incorporating outcomes from a value engineering study conducted to identify potential opportunities for capital and operating cost reductions. It should be read as an addendum or update to the Original DFS.

The phased construction strategy outlined in the Original DFS has been replaced by a single-phase approach delivering full nameplate capacity from initial commissioning.

The field development plan was optimized, which resulted in a reduction of the number of wells and their locations.

The next Step for the Kachi Project is to continue to advance the EIA approval process with the Catamarca Mining Authority, with approval anticipated in the second half of 2025.

Owners

SourceSource
CompanyInterestOwnership
Lilac Solutions 20 % Indirect
Lake Resources NL 80 % Indirect
Lake Resources is the manager of the Kachi Project. The mineral owner of the project is Morena del Valle Minerals S.A., which is owned by Kachi Lithium Pty Ltd (KLP).

Lake is an 80% shareholder and Lilac is a 20% shareholder in KLP. It is anticipated that Lilac will earn a further 5% stake in KLP and ownership will be 75% Lake and 25% Lilac prior to Final Investment Decision.

Contractors

Lock

- subscription is required.

Deposit type

  • Brine

Summary:

The Carachi Pampa Basin is a hydrologically closed basin made up of lacustrine and alluvial sediments—gravels, sands, silts, and clays—with episodic volcanic deposits including ignimbrites, tuffs, and basalts. The basin is bounded to the east and west by north-south trending mountain ranges formed by thrust faulting. These ranges expose basement sequences that rise to elevations of about 5,100 meters above mean sea level. The Cerro Blanco pyroclastic complex lies to the south and is the main source of ignimbrites and tuffs. The Antofagasta de la Sierra and Cerro Galán volcanic complexes define the northern and northeastern highlands. Eastern ranges consist of crystalline Precambrian basement rock, sloping gently down to the basin floor.

The Carachi Pampa Basin spans 9,494 km² and is an arid, closed basin composed of interbedded lacustrine and alluvial sediments—gravels, sands, silts, and clays—with lithiumenriched brine filling pore spaces to depths exceeding 600 meters below ground surface (“m bgs”) in the central resource area.
• Groundwater flows towards the salar, the basin’s lowest elevation point, where discharge occurs through evapotranspiration, concentrating mineral-rich brine.
• A freshwater wedge overlies the brine in the north and northeast, where most groundwater enters the basin. Minimal freshwater exists in the central resource area, which hosts the planned extraction wellfield.
• Pumping tests confirm favorable hydrogeological conditions in proposed production zones (200–400 m bgs), with Unit B sands exhibiting hydraulic conductivity of 2–3 m/d. Deeper sands in Unit C average around 0.5 m/d.
• Fine-grained lacustrine deposits, particularly in the upper 200 m, limit vertical hydraulic connectivity between shallow aquifers and deeper production zones.
• Over 300 core samples analyzed by Geosystems Analysis using the Rapid Brine Release (RBR) method. More than 220 drainable porosity tests show averages of 7–8%, with fine sands at ~8%. BMR surveys indicate a 7.5% median value.
• Injection tests (12, 15, and 31 days) validate the feasibility of infield injection for spent brine disposal, supporting pressure maintenance and reducing risks of subsidence or changes to surface water bodies.
• Spent brine injection must balance proximity (for effective pressure support) and distance (to prevent dilution).
• Injection into western alluvial fans may mobilize lithium-rich brine toward downgradient extraction wells. Pressure changes propagate faster than brine movement, which takes years.
• Brine chemistry is consistent laterally and vertically. In the central salar, two long-term pumping tests recorded average lithium concentrations over 260 mg/L, with a 31-day test averaging over 270 mg/L.

Surface geophysics identified conductive brine-saturated sediments. Passive seismic data revealed basin depths of 700–800 meters in the western resource area. Contrast in velocities reflects the boundary between loosely consolidated basin fill and shallower volcanic facies. It aided to delineate zones of brine, brackish water, freshwater, and dry sediments, and added to the understanding of regional groundwater and salinity distribution.

Groundwater flows centripetally toward the salar where it discharges via evapotranspiration, concentrating the lithium brine.
• Lithium-enriched brine fills sediments to depths >600 m in the central resource area.
• Over 220 drainable porosity tests show 7–8% average in salar lithologies; BMR confirms 7.5% median. Alluvial fans have higher porosity (~20%).
• The freshwater wedge is thickest in the north and northeast. Little to no freshwater exists in the central salar which reduces dilution risk.

Dimensions
The lateral extent of the resource has been defined by the boundary of the Company’s properties, the outline of the Kachi volcano and the range of mountains to the west. The brine mineralisation, as defined by current total resource, covers approximately 274.8 km2.

Reserves

Lock

- subscription is required.

Mining Methods

Lock

- subscription is required.

Heavy Mobile Equipment

Fleet data has not been reported.

Comminution

Crushers and Mills

Milling equipment has not been reported.

Processing

Lock

- subscription is required.

Water usage

Parameter2025
Fresh water 15 l/s

Commodity Production

CommodityUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Lithium t 25,141 *626,760 *
All production numbers are expressed as carbonate. * According to 2025 study.

Operational metrics

Metrics
Annual production capacity  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study.

Production Costs

CommodityUnitsAverage
Credits (by-product) Li2CO3 USD  ....  Subscribe
Cash costs Li2CO3 USD  ....  Subscribe
Cash costs Li2CO3 USD  ....  Subscribe
Assumed price LCE USD  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study / presentation.
** Net of By-Product.

Project Costs

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Gross revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Operating margin, %  ......  Subscribe
EBITDA (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe

Personnel

Mine Management

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2025

Workforce

EmployeesYear
...... Subscription required 2025

Aerial view:

Lock

- subscription is required.