Overview
Stage | Permitting |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
Processing |
- Gravity separation
- Flotation
|
Mine Life | 19 years (as of Jan 1, 2019) |
On 27 June 2018, the Government of Canada, through the Governor-in-Council (Cabinet) issued a negative decision regarding the Ajax project.
In 2019, work was carried out related to maintaining existing infrastructure and requisite monitoring of terrain. A strategy for further action in respect of the Ajax project was also defined, which concluded with a mutual decision by the project’s partners to commence the process of re-engaging with its stakeholders, aimed at improving relations with First Nations and the local community. Under this strategy, talks were held with First Nations representatives, among others during meetings between representatives of First Nations in the Kamloops region (Canada) and representatives of the Management Board of KGHM Polska Miedz S.A. in Poland. |
Latest News | Abacus Mining & Exploration Corp.: Update on Ajax Project September 23, 2019 |
Source:
p. 20
The Ajax Project is 100% owned by KGHM Ajax Mining Inc., a joint venture company owned by Abacus Mining and Exploration Corp. (20%) and KGHM Polska Miedz S.A. (KGHM S.A.) (80%).
Deposit Type
- Porphyry
- Vein / narrow vein
Summary:
Ajax is an alkalic copper-gold porphyry deposit hosted within the Iron Mask Batholith. Mineralization extends to depths exceeding 700 m, widths exceeding 1,000 m, and has a strike length that exceeds 2,000 m. The mineralization in the project area is associated with structural corridors of highly fractured and albite-altered sections of Sugarloaf Diorite (SLD) and Sugarloaf Volcanic Hybrid (SVHYB) units.
The Iron Mask Batholith is host to more than 20 known mineral deposits and occurrences. Copper-gold mineralization within the Iron Mask Batholith is associated with the younger intrusive phases of CHMZ and SLD. Mineralization is generally localized along major fault zones, at the contacts with the older PHD and IMH units and associated with albite and potassium feldspar alteration.
The mineralization in the project area is associated with structural corridors of highly fractured sections of SLD and SVHYB phases of the Iron Mask Batholith. Chalcopyrite is the dominant copper mineral and occurs as veins, veinlets, fracture fillings, disseminations and isolated blebs in the host rock. Concentrations of chalcopyrite rarely exceed 5%. Accessory sulphide minerals include pyrite and molybdenite.
Copper mineralization in the Ajax area consists predominantly of chalcopyrite and is hosted primarily in the SLD and SVHYB units. This mineralization appears to have greater concentration within the Sugarloaf units near the contact with IMH. Some mineralization is also seen within the IMH, MAFV, PXPP and PICR units near the contacts with Sugarloaf units, but mineralization drops off quickly with increasing distance from the contact. Chalcopyrite occurs as blebs and disseminations, in fractures, veinlets and micro-veinlets, as well as in occasional breccias and vugs with calcite. High-grade copper mineralization (>1.0% Cu) is confined to chalcopyrite vein systems. High-grade mineralization can extend several metres from the vein structure. Low-grade copper mineralization (0.10% to 0.50% Cu) is generally associated with the SLD-IMH contact. Drilling on the Ajax property has shown that mineralization extends to depths exceeding 700 m, widths exceeding 1,000 m and has a strike length exceeding 2,000 m.
Sulphide mineralization at Ajax also consists of pyrite and molybdenite. Pyrite is ubiquitous, occurring with chalcopyrite but also peripherally to the copper mineralization. Molybdenite is occasionally observed in SLD and SVHYB units, associated with potassium feldspar ± carbonate veins. Tetrahedrite has also been observed in trace amounts. Secondary copper oxides bornite and chalcocite occur infrequently.
Very minor amounts of the copper oxides malachite and azurite occur near surface. Native copper has also been observed locally.
As albite alteration was a precursor to mineralization, not all altered areas are mineralized. Where albitization is intense and texturally destructive, typically no copper mineralization is present. Intense albitization is interpreted to have rendered the SLD impermeable to mineralized fluids.
There are three copper mineralization/albite relationships:
- High-grade copper with weak to moderate albitization
- Low-grade copper with high albitization
- Barren copper with high albitization.
Gold mineralization is common and has a significant correlation with copper, but is very finegrained and visible gold has not been observed in the core. Gold mineralization increases slightly in areas where strong albite alteration occurs (Wardrop, 2009). It is common for gold concentrations to be directly correlated with copper concentrations. It is infrequent for gold mineralization to occur without associated copper; however, in areas of moderate to strong potassium feldspar alteration, this can occur. Variable gold-copper ratios throughout the deposit suggest a series of pulses of gold-copper mineralization were emplaced. Spatial distribution of copper-gold ratios has pointed to at least three phases of mineralization in the Ajax West Pit but possibly only one in the Ajax East Pit (Bond, 1988). In addition, northwest trending faults seem to be offsetting copper mineralization and concentrating gold, possibly due to later remobilization along structures.
Minor palladium mineralization is associated with copper near the contacts of the IMH and SLD units (Wardrop, 2009). Minor amounts of silver have also been found.
Summary:
The proposed mine plan envisages a conventional open pit operation producing 65,000 t/d of ore to the processing facility. The pit has been designed to be developed in seven phases. The ultimate pit will be approximately 2.7 km in an east-west direction and approximately 1.3 km in a north-south direction.
Two stockpiles will be utilized to maximize the discounted cash flow of the project. A mid-grade stockpile and a low-grade stockpile will be constructed to store lower grade ore and will be reclaimed and processed later in the mine life.
A conventional truck and shovel fleet will be used to mine 15 m benches. Drilling and blasting will be required. Horizontal drains are proposed as the primary means to depressurize the pit slope. In-pit water will be removed by way of ditches, pipes, sumps, pumps, and booster pumps.
Four mine rock storage facilities (MRSFs) for waste rock are planned for the Ajax Site. The east mine rock storage facility (EMRSF) will be constructed east of the ultimate pit. Similarly the south mine rock storage facility (SMRSF), will be located south of the ultimate pit. The tailings embankment will be constructed in two parts using run-of-mine rock, the north and east sections. A north extension and buttress for the main tailings embankment called the west mine rock storage facility (WMRSF) will be constructed to increase storage capacity, reduce haul costs, and to increase the stability of the TSF Embankment. A backfill storage facility is also planned once Phase 6 of the interim pit phases has been completed.
The ultimate pit will be developed through a series of seven interim phases.
The first two phases focus on the extraction of high grade ore with a low strip ratio in the area of the existing West pit. Phase 3 further expands the existing East pit and takes advantage of a low strip ratio to maintain an uninterrupted ore release during the mining of Phase 2. Phase 3 also allows for development of Phase 4 which combines the existing West and East mining areas into a single pit. Phase 5, 6 and 7 are push backs to the Northeast and advance the pit towards the ultimate pit limits. Pit backfilling can only commence once Phase 6 has reached the maximum depth of the ultimate pit. Phase 6 completes the Western extent of the ultimate pit.
Processing
- Gravity separation
- Flotation
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The Ajax process plant is designed to process 23,725,000 dry tonnes of a copper-gold ore annually, or 65,000 t/d, producing approximately 250,000 dry tonnes of concentrate per year. The process design allows to produce a combined copper-gold concentrate at 25% Cu and 16.4 g/t Au.
The processing plant will consist of stage-wise crushing and grinding, followed by flotation processes to recover and upgrade copper from the feed ores. A gravity circuit will be included within the flotation circuit to enhance overall gold recovery. The the flotation concentrate will be thickened, filtered, and sent to the concentrate stockpile for loadout and subsequent shipment to smelters.
The final flotation tailings will be thickened and pumped into a tailings storage facility (TSF). Main process water will be recovered from the tailings thickener overflow in conjunction with reclaimed water from the barge at the tailings pond in TSF to the plant. Fresh water will be used for pump ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | Avg. LOM |
Copper
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  |
Copper
|
Head Grade, %
| 0.29 |
Copper
|
Concentrate Grade, %
| ......  |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| 0.19 |
Gold
|
Concentrate Grade, g/t
| ......  |
- Subscription is required.
Projected Production:
Commodity | Product | Units | Avg. Annual | LOM |
Copper
|
Payable metal
|
M lbs
| 117 | 2,215 |
Gold
|
Payable metal
|
koz
| ......  | ......  |
Copper
|
Metal in concentrate
|
M lbs
| 127 | 2,313 |
Gold
|
Metal in concentrate
|
koz
| ......  | ......  |
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Stripping / waste ratio
| 2.65 * |
Daily milling capacity
| 65 kt * |
Waste tonnes, LOM
| 1,130,200 kt * |
Ore tonnes mined, LOM
| 426,300 kt * |
Annual milling capacity
| 23,725 kt * |
Annual production capacity
| 250 kt of copper concentrate * |
* According to 2016 study.
Reserves at February 19, 2016:
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
130 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
875 M lbs
|
Proven
|
130 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.19 g/t
|
791 koz
|
Proven
|
130 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.4 g/t
|
1,677 koz
|
Probable
|
296 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.28 %
|
1,818 M lbs
|
Probable
|
296 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.19 g/t
|
1,813 koz
|
Probable
|
296 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.38 g/t
|
3,615 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
426 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.29 %
|
2,693 M lbs
|
Proven & Probable
|
426 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.19 g/t
|
2,605 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
426 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.39 g/t
|
5,292 koz
|
Measured
|
148 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.28 %
|
|
Measured
|
148 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.18 g/t
|
|
Measured
|
148 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.37 g/t
|
|
Indicated
|
420 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.25 %
|
|
Indicated
|
420 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.18 g/t
|
|
Indicated
|
420 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.35 g/t
|
|
Measured & Indicated
|
568 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.26 %
|
|
Measured & Indicated
|
568 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.18 g/t
|
|
Measured & Indicated
|
568 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.35 g/t
|
|
Inferred
|
29 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.13 %
|
|
Inferred
|
29 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.09 g/t
|
|
Inferred
|
29 Mt
|
Silver
|
0.17 g/t
|
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
.......................
|
.......................
|
|
Aug 21, 2020
|
- Subscription is required.
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
News:
- Subscription is required.