In accordance with Finnish regulations, Boliden Kevitsa Mining Oy owns the land within the mining concession. The site operating entity is Boliden Kevitsa Mining Oy.
- subscription is required.
Summary:
Local
Kevitsa igneous complex layered ultramafic-mafic intrusive rocks dated at 2058 ± 4 Ma (Mutanen & Huhma, 2001). The body of the intrusion extents to 2 km. The Kevitsa intrusions ultramafic units are on lower parts of the intrusion, which is overlain by the gabbroic rocks that are located on the South-West side of the ultramafics. There is a dunite unit in the middle of the deposit, which is disconcordant to magmatic layering as well in the bottom of the intrusion. Xenoliths are common in the ultramafics and within the ore body. They are variable in sizes and by composition; they typically are sedimentary, mafic or ultramafic. There are also several mafic dykes, in the intrusion, ranging in different ages but they are not very voluminous.
The Kevitsa area has undergone several tectonic and metamorphic events which are evident in the intrusion and in the country rocks (Hölttä et al. 2007). The NNE-SSW trending Satovaara fault, and other structures which are associated with it, are a structurally significant feature of the area. The Satovaara fault has deformed the eastern margin of the Kevitsa intrusion and within the deposit, there are smaller scale structures in similar trend.
Property
The Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization is located in the centre of the intrusions ultramafic rocks, and it is hosted typically by olivine websterite and its variants. In the broad sense, they can be described as clinopyroxene-dominated rocks with 0-30 % orthopyroxene, 5-25 % olivine and 0-10 % plagioclase. These rocks have very subtle visual and geochemical differences. The distribution and form of observed mineralogical and geochemical patterns are interpreted to represent multiple magmatic phases. There are no internal contacts to these pulses, but in many instances the base of one pulse (olivine websterite) will grade relatively sharply into the upper part of another pulse (plagioclase bearing olivine websterite). These layers are irregular in shape. Geochemically, differentiation within these pulses is most clearly demonstrated by Al2O3. It is proposed by Luolavirta et al. (2017), that the Kevitsa magma chamber was initially filled by stable continuous flow (“single” input) of basaltic magma followed by differentiation in an at least nearly closed system. In the following stage, new magma pulses were repeatedly emplaced into the interior of the intrusion in a dynamic (open) system forming the sulfide ore bodies. This model would explain the contrasting intrusive stratigraphy in the different parts of the intrusion, which likely is reflecting different emplacement histories.
The most widespread alteration in Kevitsa resource area is amphibole alteration of ferromagnesian minerals. The alteration is typically pervasive in style and has generally ‘”sharp boundaries” i.e. it does not grade out. Pervasively amphibole altered rocks are often accompanied by carbonate alteration: there can be millimetre- to metre-scale carbonate or carbonate-quartz veining. The first alteration phenomenon in Kevitsa, being also common, is the serpentine alteration where the olivine is replaced by dark serpentine. Magnetite was initially primary mineral but it is also associated with other alteration styles as veins like serpentine and carbonate alteration. Epidote alteration is associated with the rodingite dykes. Actinolite-chlorite alteration seem to be associated with the structures. Narrow actinolitic selvedges are also common on carbonate ± quartz vein margins, but these wider, green actinolite features are a distinctive vein set. Talc-carbonate alteration is strongly associated with the shear zones, late fractures and veins representing CO2 bearing fluids. The style can range from selective replacement of ferromagnesian species to pervasive alteration of the rock.
Mineralization
The known economic Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization is disseminated in style. While having some minor semi massive sulphide veins. Overall mineralization volume is irregular in shape, and it is cut by several faults which locally are offsetting the mineralization. The predominant mineralization type is Ni-Cu, comprising 95 % of the deposit. Within it, are mineralization domains, which can be separated by the distribution of Cu and NiS grades, and as well with the amount of PGE’s. The so-called Ni-PGE mineralization is in relatively small in volume.
The main economical minerals are chalcopyrite and pentlandite, but mineralogically speaking pyrrhotite is the most common sulphide. Typically, the sulphide grain size varies from fine to medium, and the grain aggregates are in the interstitial spaces of the silicates. In unaltered rocks the sulphide silicate grains are smooth and plain but in amphibole altered rocks the boundaries are irregular and serrated. Chalcopyrite generally occur as large anhedral grains, sometimes with cubanite and talnakhite, and as fine intergrowths within the gangue silicates. Pentlandite can be coarse-grained sub-euhedral, smaller intergranular grain bands between silicates and pyrrhotite, and “exolution flame” inclusions within pyrrhotite or pyrite of very fine grain size. In addition to pentlandite the nickel occurs in crystal lattice of some silicate minerals such as olivine, clinopyroxene and tremolite. The nickel in silicates is not recoverable in metallurgical process and therefore sulphide nickel is analysed by selective leach method. Pd and Pt typically occur as sulfosalts, such as arsenides and tellurides. According to Kojonen et al. (2008), over half of the PGE carrying minerals are as inclusions in amphibole, serpentine and chlorite. PGE carrying minerals which are related to sulphides occur mostly on sulphide grain boundaries, inclusions in sulphides or in late fracture fillings in pentlandite.