• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
Canada
Mont Sorcier Project

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
18 km E from Chibougamau, Quebec, Canada

  Project Contacts:
125 Rue des Forces Armees
Chibougamau
Quebec, Canada
G8P 3A1
EmailEmail
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in Canada
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StagePreliminary Economic Assessment
Mine TypeOpen Pit
Commodities
  • Iron (magnetite)
  • V2O5
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Processing
  • Vacuum filtration
  • Dewatering
  • Magnetic separation
Mine Life37 years (as of Jan 1, 2020)
Latest NewsVanadium One Announces Closing of $1.54 Million Non-Brokered Private Placement Financing     August 24, 2020


Owners

Source: p. 41, 50
CompanyInterestOwnership
Vanadium One Iron Corp. 100 % Indirect
As of January 2019, Vanadium One Iron Corp. (VONE) earned a 100% interest in the Property through an option agreement with Mines Indépendantes Chibougamau Inc., who retains a 2% GMR on the Property, Globex Mining also retains a 1% GMR on the Property.

Deposit Type

  • Magmatic


Summary:

The Project area is located at the northeast end of the Archaean Abitibi Sub-Province, comprising east-west trending volcanic and sedimentary “greenstone belts”. The volcanic-sedimentary belts are folded and faulted and typically have a steep dip, younging away from major intervening domes of intrusive rocks. Major, crustal-scale, east-trending fault zones are prominent in the Abitibi greenstone belt. In the Chibougamau area, a large layered mafic complex (the Lac Dore Complex or LDC) has been emplaced into the volcaniclastic stratigraphy.

The LDC is a stratiform intrusive complex composed primarily of (meta-) anorthosite with lesser amounts of gabbro, anorthositic gabbro, pyroxenite, dunite and harzburgite. The anorthosite represents 70–90% by volume of the lithologies present within the LDC. A younger granite emplaced in the centre of the LDC obscures the mafic lithologies in this area. The LDC stratigraphy comprises four zones (Allard, 1976):
• The lowermost anorthositic zone composed of anorthosite and gabbro
• The layered zone composed of bands of ferro-pyroxenite, magnetite-bearing gabbro, magnetitite (rock consisting of at least 90% magnetite) (containing titanium and vanadium) and anorthosite
• The granophyre zone (at the top) composed of soda-rich leuco-tonalite
• The border zone in contact with the surrounding sedimentary and volcanic rocks.

The Project area itself straddles the contact between the mafic magmatic rocks of the LDC to the south and sediments and mafic volcanics of the Roy Group to the north, into which the LDC is emplaced. Within the property, the volcanic stratigraphy of the Roy Group comprises predominantly basaltic to andesitic rocks of the Obatogamau Formation and Basalt, andesitic basalt, mafic to felsic volcaniclastic rock, dacite, rhyolite, banded iron formation, chert, and argillite of the Waconichi Formation. Both the LDC and Roy Group are crosscut by mafic to ultramafic sills and younger plutonic intrusions ranging from tonalites to carbonatites.

The Project area is largely underlain by anorthosites of the LDC, which grade into the iron-rich ultramafic units through a crude stratigraphy comprising (from base to top): anorthosite, gabbro, magnetite-gabbro, magnetitepyroxenite, magnetite-peridotite, magnetite-dunite and centimetre- scale magnetitite layers. The presence of magnetite is strongly associated with ultramafic units – although magnetite is locally observed within anorthosites, it occurs only as minor disseminations or veinlets within the anorthosites. The banded iron formation (BIF) of the Waconichi Formation is also notable in the project area, the LDC can be seen in contact with these BIFs, and in places, possibly assimilating them. This may have implications for the formation of the low-Ti magnetitites within the Project.

The upright regional folding has also affected the layered mafic-ultramafic rocks of LDC in the Mont Sorcier area, and the Project area represents the northern limb of the large east-west trending anticlinal LDC. The North Zone and South Zone represent the same stratigraphic unit that has been folded into kilometre-scale parasitic folds, with the North Zone representing the north- dipping limb of a smaller-scale anticlinal fold structure, and the South Zone representing the hinge zone of a syncline.

Magnetite mineralization at the Mont Sorcier Project shows several similarities to other magmatic vanadiferous titanomagnetite (VTM) or ilmenite deposits associated with layered mafic intrusive complexes, where repeated crystallisation and settling of magnetite leads to the formation of magnetite layers. Vanadium is compatible in the magnetite crystal structure and fractionates into magnetite. However, VTM mineralization at Mont Sorcier is unusual in several respects:
• It is associated with olivine-bearing ultramafic units, with remarkably primitive compositions; and
• The VTM is anomalously low in titanium, with TiO2 grades generally below 2%.

Two significant mineralized zones are found on the Property – the North Zone and the South Zone.

The North Zone is identifiable in the field and through airborne magnetics over a strike length of approximately 4 km. It appears to be between 100 m and 300 m in thickness, forming a roughly tabular body that strikes eastwest, is subvertical and extends to depths of at least 500 m based on drilling. The North Zone has been drilled over approximately 2.5 km of its strike length. Possible extensions to the North Zone could be found to the east, as well as down-dip.

The South Zone is identifiable over approximately 3 km strikes east-northeast to west-southwest and has been mapped in detail as well as being drilled over its entire strike length. It is thought to form a tight synclinal structure, with a shallow plunge to the west-southwest. It is 100–200 m thick and extends to at least ~300 m in depth in the western part of the deposit, shallowing towards the east. Although the total depth of mineralization has not been fully tested, it is not expected to continue to depths significantly deeper than currently defined. The South Zone has been cut by several small northeast-trending faults, one larger northeast-trending fault with a ~150 m dextral displacement and is also cut by a north-northeast trending dyke that is ~150 m thick.

Both the North Zone and South Zone appear to have formed from the crystallization of VTM triggered by assimilation of a carbonate-facies iron formation (the Lac Sauvage iron formation) by mafic magmas of the LDC. In both the North Zone and South Zone, magnetite is disseminated within ultramafic rocks (dunite, peridotite pyroxenite), and the ultramafic VTM-bearing lithologies are surrounded by mafic units (gabbro and anorthosite).

Magnetite mineralization at the Mont Sorcier Project shows several similarities to other magmatic VTM or ilmenite deposits associated with layered mafic intrusive complexes such as the Bushveld Complex (South Africa) or the Skaergard Intrusion (Greenland). In these and other layered complexes, as well as on the south-eastern margin of the LDC (the Blackrock Minerals Armitage deposit and the Vanadium Corp. Lac Dore deposit), VTM and ilmenite deposits typically form in the upper portions of the layered complexes and have been subdivided into ilmenite-dominant deposits (generally in massif-type anorthosites host rocks) and magnetite-dominant deposits (generally in layered intrusions within gabbroic host rocks – Gross, 1996).

Crystallization of magnetite is initiated when the evolving magma becomes sufficiently iron- enriched to form oxide minerals, and thereafter settling of magnetite crystals results in localized lowering of the magma density from ~2.7 to ~2.5. This creates an inverted density stratification, resulting in overturn of the magma and resulting magma mixing, thereby precipitating additional magnetite. The repetition of this process leads to the formation of several stratified layers of magnetite, often with sharp bases and gradational upper contacts. Because vanadium is compatible in the magnetite crystal structure, it fractionates into magnetite, thereby depleting the remaining magma of vanadium. This results in the lowermost magnetite-bearing units in layered complexes typically having the highest V2O5 values, with the vanadium content of the magnetite gradually decreasing upwards through the stratigraphy – lower layers can have V2O5 contents of up to 3%, while this drops to below 0.3% in the upper layers. Conversely, titanium is incompatible, and becomes more concentrated in the residual magma – hence the lower VTM layers have lower titanium contents (typically 7–12% TiO2) than upper layers (up to 20% TiO2), where ilmenite and even rutile may be observed.


Mining Methods

  • Truck & Shovel / Loader


Summary:

Mont Sorcier is modelled to be mined using traditional truck and loader open pit mining methods, focusing on extraction of magnetite mineralized material and waste materials. During its life, two mining areas will be developed – a large open pit on the north side of the mine and a smaller pit to the south. The south mining area may operate up to four distinct open pits:
• South Main (the largest of the south area pits)
• South 1, 2 and 3 (relatively small pits to the east of the South Main pit).

The mine will need to support a processing plant with nominal output of 5 Mtpa of dry concentrate. The plant recovery will depend on quality of mineralized material and concentration of the primary mineral – magnetite. Based on an average magnetite concentration in the mineralized material, it is expected the pits will deliver up to 15 Mtpa of mineralized material on average. The waste mining will be on average at about 13 Mtpa, with the maximum currently predicted not to exceed 45 Mtpa. This combined with relatively low waste to mineralized material strip ratio, would allow for bulk mining of both waste and mineralized material.

The material is mostly fresh and therefore drilling and blasting will need to sufficiently fragment the rock to allow for efficient loading and hauling of rock from the pits. The near vertical dip of the mineralization is in favour of a simple bulk mining operation. It is expected that the dilution and mineralized material loss during blasting and loading will be minimal.

The scheduling has produced a 15-year schedule for the South Zone and 33-year LOM plan for the North Zone. The combined schedule ended up being a 37-year long plan.

While the mining from the individual zones conformed to the mining limits imposed, the combined schedule has a peak demand between and including periods 6 to 11, of above 35 Mtpa. This can be smoothed further by a more aggressive pre-stripping in the first five years of the plan, or by deferring some waste mining to years after the period 11 (where possible, but this may affect mineralized material delivery rates later in the mine life). Average annual total material mined (TMM) over the first 15 years is about 30 Mtpa.

After the South Zone is exhausted, the North Zone is already sufficiently stripped of waste that the TMM is manageable under the notional 35 Mtpa limit. The drop in concentrate production between years 28 and 33 suggest more stripping would be required to fill that gap. Alternatively, some build-up of ROM stockpile in the years 15 to 21 may help to cover for such a shortfall in later periods. A trade-off between stockpiling early or extra mining capacity later could be considered.


Crushing and Grinding
Crusher / Mill TypeModelSizePowerQuantity
Jaw crusher 1
Cone crusher 1
High Pressure Grinding Roll crusher 1
Ball mill 2

Summary:

The ROM mineralized material is hauled to the primary crushing area, where the trucks discharge directly (or from a crushing area feed stockpile by the means of front-end loader) into a hopper. The hopper discharges to the primary jaw crusher via a vibrating feeder. The crushed product is transported by conveyor to the secondary crushing area and into a cone crusher, which operates in a closed loop with a dry vibrating screening system. The screen oversize reports back to the cone crusher, while the screen undersize is conveyed to a crushed feed stockpile.

Auxiliary equipment like dust collectors, pneumatic rock breakers, overhead cranes and monorails will support the operation and maintenance of the primary and secondary crushers and related equipment.

The crushed mineralized material is transferred from the crushed stockpile by apron feeders onto the crushed stockpile conveyor. The latter reports to the feed bin of the primary grinding unit comprising high pressure grinding rolls (HPGR). The discharge from each HPGR feeds a wet vibrating screening system working in a closed loop with the HPGR. The screens oversize reports back to the HPGR, while the screens undersize reports to the first stage of magnetic separation – the cobber LIMS units. The cobber non-magnetic product reports to the tailings thickener via tailings cyclones, while the cobber magnetic product reports to the classification cyclones.

The classification cyclones’ undersize reports to a secondary grinding process comprising two ball mills units operating in parallel, and the ball mills’ product reports to the rougher LIMS area.


Processing

  • Vacuum filtration
  • Dewatering
  • Magnetic separation

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The process plant is designed to produce 5.0 Mtpa of magnetite concentrate over a 37-year mine life. The ROM is calculated based on a magnetite plant weight recovery of 45%.

The concentrator operates on a 365 days per year, 24 hours per day schedule with 80% crusher plant equipment utilization and 90% main concentrator area equipment utilization. Concentrator feed is assumed to be 97% solid, including 3% of moisture content.

The rougher LIMS magnetic product reports back to the classification cyclones and the rougher LIMS non-magnetic product reports to the tailings thickener.

The classification cyclones’ oversize reports to a desliming thickener and the thickener overflow reports to tailings, while the desliming thickener undersize is fed to a finisher LIMS area.

The finisher LIMS non-magnetic product is pumped to the tailings thickener and the finisher LIMS magnetic product reports to the concentrate dewatering area.

The final ........

Recoveries & Grades:

CommodityParameterAvg. LOM
Iron (magnetite) Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Iron (magnetite) Head Grade, % 23
Iron (magnetite) Concentrate Grade, %  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Projected Production:

CommodityUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Iron (magnetite) Mt 5177
All production numbers are expressed as concentrate.

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Stripping / waste ratio  ......  Subscription required
Waste tonnes, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Total tonnes mined, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Annual production capacity  ......  Subscription required
Daily processing rate  ......  Subscription required
Tonnes processed, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Annual mining rate  ......  Subscription required
Annual ore mining rate  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2020 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Reserves at April 23, 2019:
Cut-off grade is 20% Fe2O3 (14% Fe).

CategoryTonnage CommodityGrade
Indicated 113.5 Mt Iron 22.7 %
Inferred 520.6 Mt Iron 25.4 %

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnitsAverage
Cash costs Iron (magnetite) CAD  ......  Subscription required *
Total cash costs Iron (magnetite) CAD  ......  Subscription required *
All-in sustaining costs (AISC) Iron (magnetite) CAD  ......  Subscription required *
Assumed price Iron (magnetite) USD  ......  Subscription required *
* According to 2020 study / presentation.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2020 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Pre-Production capital costs $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Sustaining CapEx $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Closure costs $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Total CapEx $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
OP OpEx $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Processing OpEx $M CAD 2,010
Transportation (haulage) costs $M CAD 9,368
G&A costs $M CAD 418
Total OpEx $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Mining Taxes $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Income Taxes $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Total Taxes $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Royalty payments $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Gross revenue (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Operating margin (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
EBITDA (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax NPV @ 5% $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M CAD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of February 27, 2020:
HME TypeModelSizeQuantity
Dozer ....................... Subscription required 3
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 6
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 14
....................... Subscription required 3
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Jan 12, 2021
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Jan 12, 2021
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Feb 27, 2020
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Feb 27, 2020
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Staff:

Total WorkforceYear
Subscription required 2020

Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2020
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

News:

NewsDate
Vanadium One Announces Closing of $1.54 Million Non-Brokered Private Placement Financing August 24, 2020
Vanadium One Closes First Tranche of Non-Brokered Private Placement of Common Share Units and Flow Through Share Units August 17, 2020
Vanadium One Announces Upsize of Non-Brokered Private Placement August 11, 2020
Vanadium One Iron Announces Private Placement July 21, 2020
Vanadium One Iron Files Technical Report for the Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Mont Sorcier Iron and Vanadium Project Thursday, April 9, 2020 2:22 PM April 9, 2020
Vanadium One Iron Reports an After Tax NPV of C$1.7 Billion and IRR of 33.8% in Its Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Mont Sorcier Iron and Vanadium Project February 27, 2020

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2020 MDO Data Online Inc.