• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
Ecuador
Cascabel (Alpala) Project

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
50 km NW from Ibarra, Ecuador

  Project Contacts:
Avenida Coruña E25-58 y San Ignacio, Edificio Altana Plaza, piso 4 oficina 406
Quito
Ecuador
Phone  ...  Subscription required
EmailEmail
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in Ecuador
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StagePreliminary Economic Assessment
Mine TypeUnderground
Commodities
  • Copper
  • Gold
  • Silver
Mining Method
  • Block caving
  • Sub-level Retreat
Processing
  • Flotation
Mine Life55 years (as of Jan 1, 2019)
Latest NewsCornerstone Capital Resources Inc.: Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Cascabel Property, Alpala Deposit, Northern Ecuador     January 29, 2021


Owners

Source: p. 31
CompanyInterestOwnership
SolGold Plc 85 % Indirect
The project is located in northern Ecuador with the registered holder of the mineral tenure being Exploraciones Novomining S.A. (ENSA) which was formerly called Santa Barbara Copper & Gold S.A. ENSA is currently jointly owned by SolGold (85%) and Cornerstone Capital Resources (Cornerstone) (15%).

Deposit Type

  • Porphyry
  • Vein / narrow vein


Summary:

The mineralisation observed at surface and in the drill core along the trend of the Alpala Deposit is considered as a classic porphyry copper-gold system and exploration has been designed with this in mind as a primary target. The site team is continuously engaged in advancing the understanding of the porphyry systems at Cascabel and exploration also keeps in mind the potential for surrounding economic porphyry deposits within a 1-2 km radius of the Alpala Deposit, as well as the potential for discovery of epithermal and skarn deposits peripheral to these porphyry systems throughout the Cascabel Project area.

Porphyry deposits are characterised by disseminated, veinlet- and fracture-controlled copper-iron sulphide minerals distributed throughout a large volume of rock in association with potassium silicate, sericitic, propylitic and, less commonly, advanced argillic alteration in porphyritic plutons and in the immediate wall rocks. In porphyry systems, there exists a close spatial and temporal link between volumetrically-small causative intrusions and broadly dispersed magmatic-hydrothermal alteration and mineralisation. Porphyry copper deposits are large (commonly hundreds to thousands of million tonnes) and low to medium in grade (0.3 to 1.5% copper). The majority of gold-rich porphyry deposits occur in the circum-Pacific and commonly contain 0.3 to 1.6 g/t gold.

Porphyry systems are causal to different deposits including:
-Porphyry deposits centred on the parent intrusion and its surrounding host rocks;
-Epithermal and skarn deposits peripheral to porphyry deposits;
-Carbonate replacement and sediment hosted deposits with increasing distance from the parent intrusion.

Mineralisation is seen across the six main intrusive bodies and the porphyry-related vein types to a varying degree. Early-formed hydrothermal magnetite occurs within early AB- and B1-type veins, and as monomineralic veinlets, disseminated grains and replacements of hornblende. Magnetite is variably converted to metallic haematite and pyrite in the upper part of the deposit where chlorite-epidote altered intrusions and volcaniclastic rocks are moderately to strongly affected by feldspar-destructive alteration.

The earliest formed sulphide mineral observed in drill-core consists of abundant chalcopyrite and rare bornite in B-type veins. Chalcopyrite most commonly forms after, and surrounds, cubic and massive pyrite in C- and D-type veins. It also occurs in anhydrite-rich veins and B-type veins that have been re-opened by later vein types. Late-stage bornite is in textural equilibrium with pyrite and chalcopyrite in C- and D-type veins, which suggests that these later-stage veins formed at a lower temperature and a higher sulfidation state than chalcopyrite in early-stage B-type veins (Einaudi et al., 2003).

The bulk of the copper mineralisation is hosted within the B-veins. Chalcopyrite-rich, C-type sulphide veins also contain significant amounts of metal and may be associated with elevated gold grades. Mineralising fluids are believed to have been introduced during the emplacement of the QD10 and to a less extent the QD15 intrusive. These defined two broad mineralising events at Alpala.

Quartz- and sulphide-vein abundances are recorded by SolGold during core logging and allow for the correlation with the final assay grades. This correlation illustrates a strong important to B-type veining to the mineralising system, particularly below 2% Cu. Therefore B-type vein abundance can be used as an analogy for the mineralisation boundaries during modelling.


Mining Methods

  • Block caving
  • Sub-level Retreat


Summary:

The mine plan uses the block caving method which is considered to be the appropriate method due to the size, grade, ground conditions and depth of the Alpala deposit. High level studies have highlighted some areas of the deposit that may be mined using other bulk underground methods, such as sublevel caving, but that these are small and not material to the plan at this early stage of study.

The conceptual mine plan considered in PEA consists of two phases. In the first phase, the highest value material is targeted. Mining criteria are more conservative with column heights restricted to ~500 m and a relatively even draw across each footprint to ensure even cave propagation. In the second phase, lower value, but potentially economic material is mined, along with more aggressive mine planning assumptions, with taller columns and a greater variation of draw heights within a column.


Crushing and Grinding
Crusher / Mill TypeModelSizePowerQuantity
Cone crusher ....................... Subscription required 600 kW 2
Cone crusher 2200 kW 2
SAG mill 12.81m x 6.76m 25424 kW 2
Ball mill 9.15m x 11.08m 22014 kW 4
Vertical mill / Tower ....................... Subscription required 4500 kW 8

Summary:

Grinding Circuit
The grinding circuit is proposed as a conventional SAG mill / Ball Mill / Pebble Crusher (SABC) configuration for treatment of competent ores at elevated throughput. It should be noted that the pebble crusher may be required only in later years.

Primary Grinding
Crushed ore will be reclaimed from the coarse ore stockpile, via variable speed apron feeders, directly to the SAG mill feed conveyor which will transport the ore to the SAG mill feed chute. Process water will also be added to the SAG mill, via the SAG mill feed chute. The variable speed SAG mill will operate with a nominal ball charge of 10% v/v. The 125 mm steel balls will be loaded into the SAG mill ball storage hopper via a front-end-loader (FEL). Media will be added to the SAG mill feed conveyor via a dedicated media charger.

The SAG mill feed rate will be controlled to optimise throughput and flotation feed grind size by the plant’s expert control system. The SAG mill feed conveyors will be equipped with a weightometer for metallurgical accounting.

The SAG mill product with a top size of 85 mm will discharge from the mill to a screen. The oversize will be screened and washed over a double deck, vibrating screen. Oversize from the screen decks will discharge to the pebble recycle conveyor which feeds the pebble crusher. The pebble crusher will be operated to maximise power draw and to maintain a set chamber fill level, typically 60%. Self-cleaning electromagnets on the conveying system protect the cone crushers from tramp metal and crushed pebbles will be transferred to a surge bin before being fed proportionately to the SAG mill feed conveyors via belt feeders.

Pebble Crushing
Comminution lines for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 will feed pebbles back to a common pebble recycle conveyor. A self-cleaning metal tramp magnet would be located at the transfer point of the recycle conveyor. SAG mill pebbles will return to the SAG mill feed conveyor.

Secondary Grinding and Classification
Each secondary grinding circuit will consist of two ball mills operating in parallel and in closed circuit with cyclone clusters. The discharge from the SAG mill discharge pump box and ball mill trommel screen underflow will discharge into a cyclone feed hopper, one per ball mill line. Each cyclone cluster will be fed by a cyclone feed pump. During the initial Phase 1 ramp-up, only one ball mill-cyclone cluster may be required.

Each ball mill feed chute receives mill feed dilution water, grinding media and cyclone underflow. The ball mill discharge is screened via a trommel screen. Each ball mill trommel screen undersize will gravitate to the cyclone feed hoppers.

The slurry from the cyclone feed hopper is pumped to a dedicated cyclone cluster. The cyclone overflow will gravitate to a combined cyclone overflow stilling box. Cyclone underflow from each cluster will return to its respective ball mill for additional grinding. Trunnion magnets will remove ball chips from the ball mill discharge, preventing a build-up of chips.

Auxiliary equipment in the grinding section of the plant will include a common kibble crane to service each ball mill. There will be a single ball storage bunker for both Phase 1 and Phase 2. Each ball mill has a kibble loading facility and ball charging system. Two ball mill feed chute removal systems and two liner handler systems will be provided which will allow the servicing of two ball mills at the same time. Two liner bolt removal tools will also be provided.

Concentrate Regrind Circuit
The combined rougher and cleaner scavenger concentrate will be pre-classified, via concentrate regrind cyclone clusters. Cyclone underflow constitutes the feed to the concentrate regrind mill. The regrind section consists of series of stirred vertical regrind mills arranged in a conventional closed-circuit configuration with cyclones to produce the required feed size to optimise concentrate grade and recovery.


Processing

  • Flotation

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The concentrator is anticipated to utilise the following principal process areas for the recovery of copper and gold into copper concentrates:
-Crushed ore stockpile and reclaim;
-Secondary crushing (deferred);
-Open circuit SAG milling;
-Pebbles return to pebble crushers (deferred);
-Closed circuit ball milling and classification;
-Copper rougher flotation;
-Rougher concentrate regrind;
-Three stages of copper cleaners and cleaner scavenger flotation;
-Copper concentrate thickening and storage;
-Copper concentrate thickening, concentrate pipeline, filtration and storage;
-Tailings thickening, disposal and decant water return;
Process water storage and distribution;
-Raw water storage and distribution Reagent make-up and distribution;
-High and low pressure air distribution.

Underground ore will be transferred to the coarse stockpile conveyor which deposits the crushed material onto the coarse ore stockpil ........

Recoveries & Grades:

CommodityParameterAvg. LOM
Copper Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Copper Head Grade, % 0.38
Copper Concentrate Grade, %  ......  Subscription required
Gold Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Gold Head Grade, g/t 0.26
Gold Concentrate Grade, g/t  ......  Subscription required
Silver Head Grade, g/t 1.08
Silver Concentrate Grade, g/t  ......  Subscription required
Pyrite Concentrate Grade, %  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Projected Production:

CommodityProductUnitsDailyAvg. Annual
Copper Metal in pyrite concentrate t 150,000
Gold Metal in pyrite concentrate oz  ......  Subscription required
Silver Metal in pyrite concentrate oz  ......  Subscription required
Pyrite Concentrate t  ......  Subscription required *
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Tonnes processed, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Annual processing capacity  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2019 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Reserves at March 18, 2020:
The Mineral Resource is reported using a cut-off grade of 0.21% CuEq.

CategoryTonnage CommodityGradeContained Metal
Measured 1,192 Mt Copper 0.48 % 5.7 Mt
Measured 1,192 Mt Gold 0.39 g/t 15 M oz
Measured 1,192 Mt Silver 1.37 ppm 52.4 M oz
Measured 1,192 Mt Copper Equivalent 0.72 % 8.6 Mt
Indicated 1,470 Mt Copper 0.37 % 4.2 Mt
Indicated 1,470 Mt Gold 0.14 g/t 6.6 M oz
Indicated 1,470 Mt Silver 0.84 ppm 39.8 M oz
Indicated 1,470 Mt Copper Equivalent 0.37 % 5.5 Mt
Measured & Indicated 2,663 Mt Copper 0.37 % 9.9 Mt
Measured & Indicated 2,663 Mt Gold 0.25 g/t 21.7 M oz
Measured & Indicated 2,663 Mt Silver 1.08 ppm 92.2 M oz
Measured & Indicated 2,663 Mt Copper Equivalent 0.53 % 14 Mt
Inferred 544 Mt Copper 0.24 % 1.3 Mt
Inferred 544 Mt Gold 0.11 g/t 1.9 M oz
Inferred 544 Mt Silver 0.61 ppm 10.6 M oz
Inferred 544 Mt Copper Equivalent 0.31 % 1.7 Mt

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnitsAverage
Assumed price Copper USD  ......  Subscription required *
Assumed price Silver USD  ......  Subscription required *
Assumed price Gold USD  ......  Subscription required *
* According to 2019 study / presentation.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Operating Costs:

Units2019
UG mining costs ($/t milled) USD 4 *
Processing costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
Total operating costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2019 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2019 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Sustaining CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Closure costs $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Total CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
UG OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Processing OpEx $M USD 14,333
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Income Taxes $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Royalty payments $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Gross revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
EBITDA (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 8% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 7% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of March 25, 2019:
HME TypeSizeQuantity
Drill 14
....................... Subscription required 5
....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 30
....................... Subscription required 5
....................... Subscription required 10
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 3
....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required 3
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameEmailProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Mar 25, 2019
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Mar 25, 2019
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Mar 25, 2019
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Nov 15, 2020
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Staff:

Total WorkforceYear
Subscription required 2019

Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2019
Technical Report 2017
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

News:

NewsDate
Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc.: Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Cascabel Property, Alpala Deposit, Northern Ecuador January 29, 2021
Cornerstone Successful in Defence Against SolGold’s Hostile Bid October 15, 2020
SolGold Commences Offer to Acquire Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc. June 30, 2020
BHP-backed SolGold accepts $155m funding from Franco-Nevada May 14, 2020
Alpala Mineral Resource Estimate 3 delivers significant tonnage conversion to Measured Category April 7, 2020
Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc.: Cascabel (Alpala Deposit) Update March 11, 2020
SolGold PLC Announces BHP to Invest a Further US$22m in SolGold November 25, 2019
Cornerstone Files Amended Technical Report for Cascabel (Alpala Deposit) Preliminary Economic Assessment November 20, 2019
SolGold PLC Announces Full Year Results and MD&A August 16, 2019
Cornerstone Files Technical Report for Cascabel Preliminary Economic Assessment June 28, 2019
Cornerstone Announces Extremely Positive PEA Results for Cascabel Project May 20, 2019

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2020 MDO Data Online Inc.