• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
United States
Graphite One Project

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
60km N from Nome, Alaska, United States

  Project Contacts:
510 L Street, Ste 500
Anchorage
Alaska, United States
99501
EmailEmail
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in United States
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StagePreliminary Economic Assessment
Mine TypeOpen Pit
Commodities
  • Graphite
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Processing
  • Column flotation
  • Dewatering
  • Flotation
Mine Life40 years (as of Jan 1, 2019)
Latest NewsGraphite One 2021 Year in Review Completed Financing Totaling $30 Million...     December 23, 2021


Owners

Source: p. 7
CompanyInterestOwnership
Graphite One Inc. 100 % Indirect
Graphite One (Alaska) Inc. (operator) 100 % Indirect
Through its 100% owned subsidiary, Graphite One (Alaska) Inc., Graphite One Inc. is focussed on the Graphite Creek property near Nome, Alaska.

Deposit Type

  • Metamorphic


Summary:

Since the Graphite One Project graphite deposit occurs in a quartz-granite-biotite-sillimanite schist, which is a high grade metamorphic rock, the Graphite Creek mineralization is considered to be of a Flake Graphite Type Mineralization.

The Kigluaik Group consists of amphibolite and granulite facies metamorphic rocks and is therefore divided into two sub-groups, an upper and lower assemblage. Amphibolite grade upper Kigluaik Group schist is exposed on the southern flanks of the Kigluaik mountain range. Pelitic gneiss samples from the upper section of the Kigluaik group have been dated using Rb/Sr to ~735 Ma (Bunker et al., 1979). The basal Kigluaik Group contains granulite grade schist and gneiss, and is exposed on north flank of the mountains. These rocks have no direct counterparts in the adjacent mountain ranges and are believed to represent the deepest crustal rocks exposed in northwestern Alaska (Miller, 1994). The lower Kigluaik Group comprises coarse marble, quartzo-feldspathic gneiss, schist and gneiss of mafic and ultramafic composition, graphite rich schist, and garnet lherzolite.

The Graphite Creek graphite deposit is located on the north side of the Kigluaik Mountains (at about 230 m elevation). More specifically, the graphitic schist occurs on the upslope and footwall surface trace of the reactivated Kigluaik normal fault. The Kigluaik Fault generally strikes at approximately azimuth 250º and dips 75º to the north over a distance of approximately 35 km. Contemporary movement on this fault has uplifted the rugged and youthful Kigluaik Mountains to the south and down thrown the lowlands of the Imuruk Basin to the north (Hudson and Plafker, 1978).

Graphite occurs as high-grade massive to semi-massive segregations and disseminations within amphibolite facies metasedimentary rocks, primarily biotite-quartz schist with zones of sillimanite-garnet-biotite- quartz schist. Based on their apparent association with the Kigluaik Fault, the graphite-bearing schist units strike subparallel to the mountain front and dip north between 40° and 75°.

There are two distinctive graphite-bearing schist intervals at Graphite Creek. The first is sillimanite-garnet-biotite-quartz schist that contains coarse, semi-massive and massive graphite segregations and disseminated graphite. The other interval unit is biotite-quartz schist that typi-quartz schist is the principal host to higher grade graphite and makes up two distinctive layers in the metasedimentary sequence along the north flank of the Kigluaik Mountains. A third potential horizon is defined by ‘pods’ of sillimanite-garnet- biotite-quartz schist. The position of these layers is most likely structurally controlled; that is a folded unit with the third pod-like layer forming in this style as uppermost erosional features (T.Hudson, personal communication, 2012). Hence, shallow-dipping erosional remnants of the southern-most third layer makes up a few discontinuous perched masses at higher elevations. The sillimanite-garnet-biotite-quartz schist layers strike obliquely to the mountain front and dip northwards at 40° to 80°.

The sillimanite-garnet-biotite-quartz schist typically is fine to coarse grained, weathers grey, has a wavy and crenulated schistosity, garnet porphyroblasts (up to 2 cm across), and augen-shaped quartz grains. Discontinuous segregations (lenses and streaks) of coarse high-grade graphite, from centimeters to a few meters thick, are common. These highgrade graphite lenses in the sillimanite-garnet-biotite- quartz-schist have up to 60% coarse, crystalline graphite and were no doubt the sources of hand sorted graphite produced in the early 1900’s. Disseminated flakes of graphite, up to 1 mm or more across, make up several percent of the rock.

The biotite-quartz schist is fine-grained, weathers a rusty ochre colour and has regular layering with individual layers commonly 3 to 10 cm thick. Graphite occurs as disseminated flakes up to about 1 mm across and can make up several percent of the rock. Higher grade graphite-rich layers, varying from 3 to 25 cm in width are present, but are not as common as in the sillimanite-garnet-biotite-quartz schist.


Mining Methods

  • Truck & Shovel / Loader


Summary:

The mining methodology is planned as a truck and shovel operation mining along several contiguous, en-echelon, pits starting at the outcrop and progressing in the down dip direction. This method of mining allows the maximum flexibility as the equipment is highly mobile and can be moved between the active mining pits to offer the most economic extraction of the material and allow the mining engineers a high degree of flexibility in mining the resource-bearing material in a manner which allows the delivery of a consistent grade to the processing plant.

The mining operation would be conducted along 4 active benches: Bench 1 – Overburden extraction, Bench 2 – Mining of Lode 1, Bench 3 – Extraction of Inter-burden, and Bench 4 – Mining of Lode 2/3. As mining progresses with time, the benches will proceed along the outcrop surface and will also continue to mine to depth in the down dip direction.

Bench 1: This initial bench will remove the non-graphite bearing material from the surface down to the top of the graphite-bearing Lode 1. The mining involved with this bench will remove the non-graphite bearing material situated from the topographic surface down to the top of the graphite-bearing Lode 1. As this bench will initiate at the outcrop, the initial bench will be thin, but will increase in volume as the land surface rises and the natural dip of the graphite mineralization progresses to greater depths. It is noted that the topsoil extracted from this zone will be saved for later cover of the reclaimed mine area. Initially the material extracted from Bench 1 will be stockpiled near or adjacent to Bench 1 at a site defined as suitable by geotechnical testing. Generally, this stockpile is located as close to the initial cut as possible to minimize trucking costs. It is noted that as the initial phases of Bench 1 are in an area with a relatively thin layer of overburden, this stockpile will be of minimal size. As mining progresses, the material extracted below the topsoil and above Lode 1 will be trucked to the previously mined area below Bench 4 and the material dumped back into the existing open cut.

Bench 2: This bench entails the mining of the graphite material identified within Lode 1. Over the course of mining the thickness of the bench will vary within the vertical dimensions of the graphite mineralization body, but will not increase or decrease in any progressive pattern. As such, the truck and shovel methodology proposed offers the optimal mining process to effectively extract the material without including significant dilution from the non-graphite bearing overburden or interburden. The material extracted from Bench 2 will be trucked to the mineral processing area for further treatment.

Bench 3: This bench will entail the extraction of the non-graphite bearing interburden between the bottom of Lode 1 and the top of Lode 2. The thickness of this interburden zone is variable. As a result, the boundary between the bottom of Lode 1 and the top of Lode 2 will need to be carefully defined by the mine staff and care must be taken to assure that the extraction of the barren interburden material does not include significant extraction of the graphite bearing material from the top of Lode 2. Material from this bench will be trucked to a previously mined area below Bench 4 and the material dumped back into the existing open cut.

Bench 4: This bench entails the mining of Lodes 2 and 3 as a single unit. As noted before, the non-graphite bearing inter-burden between these two lodes is quite small and variable and, as such, does not lend itself to a dedicated mining horizon. During the mining of Bench 4 it is expected that the mine staff will identify larger zones of non-graphite bearing rock within the bench cut and extract this material for disposal rather than including it in the mill feed extracted from the bench. The non-graphite bearing material will be trucked to a previously mined area below Bench 4 and the material dumped back into the existing open cut. The graphite-bearing material extracted from Bench 4 will be trucked to the mineral processing area for further treatment.

To effectively follow the mine plan outlined above, the optimal method of surface mining will be to conduct what is termed a “truck and shovel” type operation. This method of mining is characterized by its flexibility in mining mineralized bodies of variable thickness and its ability to operate in a multi-pit situation. The material to be moved (whether mill feed material or waste rock) is first blasted to loosen and break up the material. The loosened material is then scooped up by large volume shovels and deposited in large trucks, which transport the material to the mill feed treatment area or to the waste rock dump area.

Grades of graphite mineralization would be closely monitored during production drilling, and production rates in the individual benches would be adjusted to meet operational and millfeed requirements. The basic mine concept presumes that each of the four benches outlined above will have a large shovel and at least two trucks available for material haulage.

Pit optimizations do not include individual benches or ramp design. For the pit size, production requirements, and recommended equipment fleet, TRU considers mining of 10 to 12 m benches in two cuts and development of an 18 m wide ramp, including ditches and safety berm, to be appropriate for the open pit operations. The ramp should be designed with a maximum 10% gradient with the exit appropriately located to minimize transport distances to the mill and the waste rock dumps. Industry average pit slope angles are assumed at this stage of planning.

An estimate of the overburden ratio was generated by analyzing the cross sections generated during the modelling process, and estimating the final pit slope angle. Based upon these assessments it is estimated that the overburden ratio for this project ranges between 2:1 and 4:1. For all subsequent discussion, a value for the overburden ratio was selected to be a conservative 3:1.


Crushing and Grinding
Flow Sheet: Source
Crusher / Mill TypeModelSizePowerQuantity
Jaw crusher 3
Ball mill 6
Hammer mill 3
Regrind 4
Rod mill 5

Summary:

Run of Mine (ROM) mineralized rock grading 7% Cg is delivered by truck to the mill where the load is deposited into dump hoppers positioned above grizzly feeders for removal of plus 500 mm material. The undersize falls through the grizzly and is fed to the primary jaw crusher to reduce the particle size from 400 mm to less than 100 mm (4 inch). Vibrating screening of the jaw crusher discharge ensures that oversize is recirculated to the jaw crusher while the undersize fraction proceeds to secondary crushing where hammer mill crushers comminute the material to 20 mm (¾ inch). Screening of hammer crusher discharges ensures that oversize is recycled while the undersize proceeds to storage bins as feed inventory to primary grinding. There will be three crushing circuits operating in parallel when the Alaska Mineral Processing Plant is at full capacity.

Crushed material from the storage bins is conveyed to the primary grinding circuit which at full capacity will consist of five rod mills operating in parallel. The rod mill is in closed circuit with cyclones where the oversize, the cyclone underflow is returned to the mill. The cyclone overflow at a particle size P80 of 150 mesh (100 microns) flows by gravity to the rougher flotation feed conditioning tank where flotation reagents are added to the pulp in preparation for flotation. Each grinding circuit will be coupled to a flotation circuit; at full plant capacity there will also be five flotation circuits in parallel.


Processing

  • Column flotation
  • Dewatering
  • Flotation

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The Mineral Processing Plant has been designed on the basis of producing 60,000 tpy graphite concentrate grading 95% Cg (graphite content). The annual feed rate of run-of-mine material grading 7% Cg to the Plant is 1,018,000 tpy. Recovery of graphite during mineral processing is assumed under optimized conditions to reach 80%.

Once received at the Mineral Processing Plant, the graphite mineralization is processed through the following unit operations:

- Two stages of crushing
- Initial grinding followed by conventional cell rougher flotation and cleaner flotation
- Multiple sequences of grinding/polishing with column flotation to progressively upgrade the concentrate to 95% Cg that is pressure filtered and pneumatically dried.

Crushed material from the storage bins is conveyed to the primary grinding circuit which at full capacity will consist of five rod mills operating in parallel. The rod mill is in closed circuit with cyclones where the ov ........

Recoveries & Grades:

CommodityParameterAvg. LOM
Graphite Recovery Rate, % 80
Graphite Head Grade, % 7
Graphite Concentrate Grade, % 95

Projected Production:

CommodityUnitsAvg. Annual
Graphite t 55,350
All production numbers are expressed as refined graphite.

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Stripping / waste ratio 3 *
Daily ore mining rate 3,090 t *
Annual production capacity 60,000 t of graphite concentrate *
Daily processing capacity 3,090 t *
Annual processing capacity 1,018,000 t *
Annual ore mining rate 1,018,000 t *
* According to 2019 study.

Reserves at March 26, 2019:
The 2019 resource update has calculated the following resources with a 5% cut-off grade.

CategoryTonnage CommodityGradeContained Graphite
Measured 1.69 Mt Graphite 8 % 135.171 kt
Indicated 9.26 Mt Graphite 7.7 % 715.363 kt
Measured & Indicated 10.95 Mt Graphite 7.8 % 850.534 kt
Inferred 91.89 Mt Graphite 8 % 7,343 kt

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnitsAverage
Cash costs Graphite USD  ......  Subscription required *
Assumed price Graphite USD  ......  Subscription required *
* According to 2019 study / presentation.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Operating Costs:

Units2019
OP mining costs ($/t milled) USD 27 *
Processing costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2019 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2019 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Total CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
OP OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Processing OpEx $M USD 70.4
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of March 26, 2019:
HME TypeModelSizeQuantity
Bulldozer ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameEmailProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Feb 22, 2021
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Feb 22, 2021
Subscription required - Subscription is required.


Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2019
Preliminary Economic Assessment 2017
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

News:

NewsDate
Graphite One 2021 Year in Review Completed Financing Totaling $30 Million... December 23, 2021
Graphite One Announces Closing of Second Tranche of $998,000 in Private Placement Offering September 24, 2021
Graphite One Announces Update on Timing of Closing Second Tranche of $12 Million Brokered Private Placement August 30, 2021
Graphite One Inc.: U.S. Government Designates Graphite One Project as High-Priority Infrastructure Project January 19, 2021
Graphite One Increases Tonnage, Grade and Contained Graphite of Measured and Indicated, and Inferred Resources in Updated Mineral Resource Estimate March 26, 2019
Graphite One Drills 16.3 Metres of 11.93% Graphite, at Graphite Creek Project, Alaska March 18, 2019

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2017-2022 MDO Data Online Inc.