Source:
p. 5
Company | Interest | Ownership |
Tristar Gold Inc.
|
100 %
|
Indirect
|
Mineração Castelo Dos Sonhos Ltda.
|
100 %
|
Direct
|
TriStar is engaged in the exploration and development of precious metals deposits. Its principal exploration property is the Castelo de Sonhos (“CDS”) property located in Pará State in northern Brazil. CDS is 100% owned by an indirect Brazilian subsidiary Mineração Castelo Dos Sonhos Ltda.
Deposit Type
- Paleoplacer
- Conglomerate hosted
Source:
p.18-19, 52-54
Summary:
The gold deposits on the Castelo dos Sonhos plateau are classified as modified paleo-placers (Frimmel, 2005), mineral deposits in which free gold grains accumulated in ancient gravels that were subsequently slightly modified by low-grade metamorphism.
Most of the gold mineralization in the Castelo dos Sonhos Formation lies in a central band where the various conglomerate lithologies dominate. At the base and top of this band, the conglomerates are interlayered with arenites, which become more frequent as one moves away from the conglomeratic band, either downward into the older rocks (the lower arenite) or upward into the younger rocks (the upper arenite).
The mineralization was also modified by shearing and open folding and hydrothermal fluids associated with subjacent granitic intrusion which affect much of the mineralized conglomerate band. The most widespread of these are silicic and hematitic alteration, both of which can, in places, be intense. Other alteration minerals that are less widespread and generally less intense include sericite, muscovite, fuchsite and epidote.
Gold occurs as free grains and flakes of various sizes, from sub-visible (less than 100 microns) to highly visible, supergene enrichment creates nuggets that can reach a few centimetres in size.
The two predominant styles of mineralization are:
1. Paleo-placer: Free grains of gold that were likely deposited along with the sediments. In corethese can be seen in the matrix of the conglomerate, sometimes in heavy mineral bands;
2. Remobilized: Gold associated with alteration, usually hematitic alteration. Free grains of gold have been observed in hematite-filled fractures, and as thin films plated onto fracture surfaces.
Gold mineralization occurs throughout the conglomeratic band. Although there are many barren samples within the conglomerate, there are gold grades above 0.5g/t in almost every drill hole that penetrates more than half of the stratigraphic thickness of the central conglomeratic band. Gold grades tend to be higher in the central cobble unit, often reaching several grams per tonne. The lowest grade encountered in drilling to date is below detection limit; the highest grade encountered in drilling to date is a 38g/t assay over a 2m interval. The existence of gold in heavy mineral bands, and its tendency to be more frequent in the proximal rocks are consistent with the view that most of the gold in the conglomerate band was deposited along with the sediments.
Where gold mineralization extends into the upper and lower arenites, such as the interval of 5–10g/t mineralization seen at the base of the upper arenite in several Esperança South drillholes, this is understood to be the result of remobilization caused by hydrothermal fluids. This remobilized gold in the arenites, along with direct observations of gold in direct association with hematite-filled fractures in the conglomerates, confirms that some of the gold within the conglomerate band must also be remobilized. The low temperatures of dike emplacement, the low grade of metamorphism, the difficulty of keeping gold in solution, and the proximity of the remobilized gold in the arenites to the conglomerate band all support the view that remobilized gold did not travel far from where it was originally deposited as paleo-placer gold. There is currently no evidence that any of the remobilized gold has migrated more than a few tens of metres.
The strike length of the mineralized conglomerate is approximately 16km; samples from outcrops and workings along the entire length of this band return both barren samples and well mineralized samples. The true width of the central conglomerate band is 250-300m at surface, the apparent width is close to true width in Esperança West, where the dip is vertical, and is approximately three times the true width in Esperança Center, where the dip can be as low as 20°.
The true depth of mineralization is unknown since the deepest parts of the conglomerate have never been encountered in drilling, but are known to be at least 500m from surface in the center of the plateau. In drill holes, well mineralized samples (above 4g/t) have been encountered at depths of 300m. The current mineral resource estimate spans the entire width of the conglomerate band (250-300m true width), but is restricted in its strike length by the availability of drilling and by the decision to report resources to a depth of only 150m. Some of the blocks on the edge of the current resource model are well mineralized, leaving the model open in the strike direction and down dip.
Esperança South
The mineralization in Esperança South is hosted in a series of stacked metaconglomerate beds striking north-south or northeast-southwest and dipping west, or northwest, at 30° to 35°, with thicknesses of individual mineralized reefs ranging from 2m to 20m. The mineralized reefs in Esperança South are thinner and higher grade than Esperança Center.
Esperança Center
The mineralization is hosted in a series of beds, striking north-south and dipping 20° to 30° west. Thicknesses of individual mineralized reefs range from 1m to 20m. Although the highest grades in Esperança South are higher than in Esperança Center, it is Esperança Center that has the higher average grade because it has far fewer very low-grade intervals. With more of the grade distribution lying close to an average of 0.2g/t, the thickness of mineralized horizons in Esperança Center increases as the cut-off used to define a significant interval is lowered. At cut-offs near 0.2g/t, there are many thick intervals, some exceeding 50m, in Esperança Center.
Source:
p.105, 108, 117
Summary:
The Castelo de Sonhos Project will be an open pit operation utilizing a contract mining fleet of hydraulic excavators, front-end loaders and 36 tonne haul trucks, associated with correspondent ancillary equipment. The mine planning model adopted is a “diluted” model, adding approximately 0 % dilution and 95% of recovery to the source model.
The disposal of waste rock will be executed on an area close to the pit. The site shall be adequately prepared to include drainage at its base and channels to direct the flow of water with the aim of aiding geotechnical stability and mitigating the erosion of the stockpiled material.
The operation of this phase, in accordance with the ascending method, shall begin during the construction of the heap at the base of this area. Waste rock will be disposed by truck, which will then be uniformly distributed and leveled by an operator using a tractor. The procedure is then repeated, stacking another bank above the original one, while maintaining a ramp for the trucks to be able to access the area.
Pit design parameters:
- Overall Slope Angle - 55°
- Face Angle - 79°
- Bench Height ROM - 8
- Bench Height Waste - 4
- Berm width - 4
- Berm width - 30m
- Road Ramp width - 12m.
The mining services will be outsourced and are based on a small-scale equipment projection to meet the selectivity requirements of the proposed mining. A CAT 345 hydraulic excavator equipped with a bucket with a volume of 3.1m3 was selected, as well as Scania G440 40-ton trucks, equipped with a hard rock type bucket. DX800 rotary type drills, with a 4” diameter drill bit, were selected for the perforation of the rock.
Source:
p.119
Crusher / Mill Type | Model | Size | Power | Quantity |
Jaw crusher
|
|
|
|
1
|
SAG mill
|
|
8.5m x 3.6m
|
|
1
|
Ball mill
|
|
5.5m x 7.5m
|
|
1
|
Summary:
The ROM is dumped in a hopper with capacity for 150 t, equipped with a stationary grizzly with a square opening of 400 mm. The coarse material, retained in this grizzly, is broken using a hydraulic hammer. The material passing through the grizzly is reclaimed by a 1.6m x 3.7 m vibrating feeder, equipped with bars spaced at 150 mm. The oversize feeds a primary jaw crusher,a 1005 t/h capacity C-130, with opening at closed size of 150 mm. The product of the primary crushing is joined to the material passing through the feeder and is conveyed to the coarse stockpile. The conveyor is equipped with auxiliary equipment, as belt scale, cross belt magnet and metal detector.
Two 1.6 x 3.7 m vibrating extractors installed under the 40,000 t capacity stockpile, reclaim the coarse ROM and feed a SAG mill through a 75 m long, 914 mm wide conveyor, at a production rate of 380 tph.
The material extracted from the stockpile feeds a 8.5m x 3.6 m (28 ft x 12 ft) EGL Semi Autogenous Mill (SAG) equipped with trommel, with opening of 1.5 inches. The oversize of the trommel feeds a cone crusher (pebbles) and the product is sent back to the SAG mill (circulating load).
The material passing on the trommel’s sieve is discharged to a box and pumped to a cluster of cyclones. The underflow of cycloning feeds a 5.5m x 7.5m (18’ x 25’) ball mill.
The overflow of cycloning, with P80 finer than <75µm, is piped to the pre-lime tank. The 50% solids pulp is mixed with lime for 6 hours to reach a pH between 10.5 and 11.
Processing
- Smelting
- Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
- Carbon in pulp (CIP)
- Carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery (ADR)
- Elution
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
- Cyanide (reagent)
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The Castelo de Sonhos project beneficiation plant was developed considering a processing rate of 3 Mt/y, which, for a regime of 7,500 effective hours per year of operation, implies a nominal hourly rate of 400 t. The average ROM grade is 1.50 g/t, which involves an average gold production of 150,000 oz/year. The process tests, provide for a minimum recovery of 95% of the current gold.
The overflow of cycloning, with P80 finer than <75µm, is piped to the pre-lime tank. The 50% solids pulp is mixed with lime for 6 hours to reach a pH between 10.5 and 11.
The slurry from pre-lime is conducted by gravity to 5 (five) agitated leach tanks in cascade, each one with capacity for 3,334 m3 of 50% in solids slurry. The leaching time in this phase is around 36 h. Cyanide is added in the first tank and where required to maintain the NaCN concentration. Slurry is transferred from one tank to the next by gravity. The mechanical arrangement allows bypassing among the tanks for maintenance or process requirements.
From the last 5th tank, the slurry is diluted for 45% solids and feeds 5 (five) CIP tanks, each one with capacity of 1,200 m3, in cascade. Each tank is equipped with a recessed impeller vertical pump and a hoister for screen handling for maintenance. The slurry residence time during adsorption is around 12 h, totaling 48 h of leaching and adsorption. Activated carbon, size ranging in between 8x16 mesh (2.36 - 1.18 mm), is added to the tanks at a rate of ranging from 18 to 20 gcarbon/lslurry. These tanks are equipped with 0.8 mm opening Kemix MPS1200 interstage screens. The slurry flows through the screen to the following tank and the carbon remains in the tank, retained by the screen.
The tailings from the 6th CIP tank are discharged in a safety high-frequency Derrick screen to prevent the loss of loaded carbon, and the passing feeds a 25 m thickener. The thickened solid is pumped to detoxification. The thickener overflow is pumped to a storage tank and distributed to the consumption points in leaching/CIP circuit. The underflow is pumped to two 785 m3 capacity cyanide destruction agitated tanks, assuring a residence time of around 3h. SMBS (sodium metabisulfide) and CuSO4 (copper sulfate) are added to these tanks to oxidize cyanide under intensive aeration, to assure complete oxidation of cyanide.
The loaded carbon stored in a bin is pumped to the acid washing facility.
The washed carbon is then transferred by recessed impeller pumps to the elution columns. For this study, the Zadra process is being considered because of its easier operation compared to the AARL method. A 1.5m diameter and 9m height strip column is filled with 4t of loaded carbon. The gold in solution is reduced electrochemically and plated in the cathodes.
After the elution cycle, or when required by process, the cathodes loaded in metallic gold are discharged twice a week or when required by the process. The cell is emptied and the cathode removed to a tank where it is washed under high-pressure water. The gold is displaced from the stainless steel wool and settles to the bottom. This sludge is pumped to a press filter, dried and smelted in a gas-fired furnace. The gold is stored in the vault and the slag stored in drums for further treatment.
Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | Avg. LOM |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| 95 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| 1.44 |
Projected Production:
Commodity | Units | Avg. Annual | LOM |
Gold
|
koz
| 120 | 1,100 |
All production numbers are expressed as metal in doré.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Stripping / waste ratio
| 8 * |
Annual mining capacity
| 3 Mt of ore * |
Waste tonnes, LOM
| 197,430 kt * |
Ore tonnes mined, LOM
| 24,715 kt * |
Total tonnes mined, LOM
| 222,144 kt * |
Plant annual capacity
| 3 Mt * |
Daily processing rate
| 8,250 t * |
* According to 2018 study.
Reserves at November 16, 2018:
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Indicated
|
17.7 Mt
|
Gold
|
1.2 g/t
|
0.7 M oz
|
Inferred
|
39.8 Mt
|
Gold
|
1 g/t
|
1.3 M oz
|
Commodity Production Costs:
| Commodity | Units | Average |
Cash costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
660 / oz *
|
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Gold
|
USD
|
687 / oz *
|
Assumed price
|
Gold
|
USD
|
1,250 / oz *
|
* According to 2018 study / presentation.
Operating Costs:
| Units | 2018 |
OP mining costs ($/t mined)
|
USD
| 2.17 * |
OP mining costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 19.5 * |
Processing costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 9.99 * |
Total operating costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 30.2 * |
* According to 2018 study.
2018 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :
Metrics | Units | LOM Total |
Initial CapEx
|
$M USD
|
184
|
Sustaining CapEx
|
$M USD
|
16
|
OP OpEx
|
$M USD
|
466.2
|
Processing OpEx
|
$M USD
|
232.8
|
G&A costs
|
$M USD
|
16.9
|
Total OpEx
|
$M USD
|
731.5
|
Royalty payments
|
$M USD
|
13.4
|
Gross revenue (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
1,356
|
EBITDA (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
589
|
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
441
|
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
372.2
|
Pre-tax NPV @ 5%
|
$M USD
|
319
|
Pre-tax NPV @ 10%
|
$M USD
|
233
|
After-tax NPV @ 5%
|
$M USD
|
264
|
After-tax NPV @ 10%
|
$M USD
|
188
|
Pre-tax IRR, %
|
|
51
|
After-tax IRR, %
|
|
43
|
Pre-tax payback period, years
|
|
1.9
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
Consultant - Mining
|
Porfirio Cabaleiro Rodriguez
|
|
Dec 26, 2018
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
News:
News | Date |
Tristar Gold Receives C$914,614 from Warrant Exercise, Fully Funded for an Aggressive Exploration Program and PFS Study
|
July 28, 2020
|
TriStar Closes $9.2 Million Bought Deal Financing
|
July 14, 2020
|
TriStar Announces $8.0 Million Bought Deal Financing
|
June 22, 2020
|
TriStar Gold Drill Results and Exploration Update
|
June 4, 2020
|
TriStar Gold: More Positive Drill Results from TriStar Castelo De Sonhos Project
|
February 27, 2020
|
TriStar Drilling Update, Goldspot Work and Directors Exercise Options
|
February 6, 2020
|
TriStar Gold Closes Oversubscribed Brokered Private Placement
|
December 12, 2019
|
TriStar Gold Working with GoldSpot Discoveries at CDS and Announces Brokered Private Placement
|
November 25, 2019
|
Tristar Announces Positive Drill Results From Castelo de Sonhos
|
November 21, 2019
|
TriStar Completes US$8 million Agreement with Royal Gold
|
August 6, 2019
|
TriStar Gold: Royal Gold becomes stakeholder in TriStar’s Castelo de Sonhos Gold Project
|
May 28, 2019
|
TriStar Gold Files Technical Report in Support of Preliminary Economic Assessment
|
December 28, 2018
|