Overview
Stage | Permitting |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
On-Site Camp |
300 people Source:  |
Mine Life | 15 years (as of Jan 1, 2020) |
While the plan to construct the project has been approved, several conditions were stated by Clausen. These included 80 per cent completion of advanced engineering plans; securing project financing; and the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions in Queensland. Upon satisfaction of these items, the company will be able to fix a construction start date. |
Source:
p. 1
On December 19, 2022, Copper Mountain Mining Corporation closed the previously announced sale of its wholly-owned Eva Copper Project and its 2,100km2 exploration land package in Queensland, Australia for total consideration of up to US$230 million (the "Transaction") to Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited.
Deposit Type
- IOCG
- Hydrothermal
- Vein / narrow vein
- Stratabound
Source:
p.26-28
Summary:
Copper deposits of the Eva Copper Project are of two types. The most significant are those of the IOCG type, which are hydrothermal copper-gold deposits associated with relatively high contents of iron oxide minerals (magnetite or hematite), a general lack of quartz, and extensive sodic alteration. The hydrothermal fluids are believed to be sourced from, and/or driven by, magmatic systems with possible addition of basin brines; however, mineralization is commonly distal (or spatially distinct) from the causative plutonic rocks. Mineralization can take many forms, but the dominant ones are vein networks, breccias, dissemination, and replacement. Both structure (fault or fracture systems) and lithology (chemistry and rheology) are key features in localization of mineralization. The second type of copper deposit is termed copper-only; these deposits do not contain significant gold, and are typically hosted within deformed and metamorphosed calcareous sedimentary rocks as stratabound mineralization. One deposit, Turkey Creek, is a stratabound copper-only deposit within volcanic rocks, and has processing characteristics similar to those for the copper-gold deposits.
There are twelve known mineral deposits in the Project area, of which seven have been included in the current mine plan. Mineral deposits are grouped into two types: copper-gold, and copper only. There are five of the copper-gold deposits, all of which are in the mine plan. These deposits are classified as iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) deposits, where mineralization is associated with regional-scale hematite and albite alteration (red-rock alteration), and localized magnetite alteration. Copper sulphide mineralization, primarily chalcopyrite with lesser bornite, occurs as veins, breccias, fracture fill, and disseminations in mafic to intermediate volcanic or intrusive rocks. Gold is generally correlated with copper, and is recovered in the copper concentrate. Mineralization appears to be localized and/or bounded by faults and other deformation-related structures.
The copper-only deposits hosted within calcareous metasedimentary rocks have additional zones of weathering and/or acid leaching, which has removed carbonate, reducing rock strength and density in addition to changing sulphide mineralogy. In the two such deposits, Blackard and Scanlan, a supergene zone termed native copper occurs below the oxide zone, and contains abundant native copper in addition to chalcocite, cuprite, and other low-sulphur copper species. Extensive metallurgical testing has been carried out on these deposits, with appropriate processing design and estimation of recoveries. Within these deposits a narrow transition zone occurs between the copper zone and underlying sulphide zone.
All of the deposits have a 10 m to 25 m thick overlying zone of oxidation, where the rock is extensively weathered, and copper sulphide minerals have been leached or converted to various oxide minerals that cannot be recovered by flotation. The oxide zones are treated as waste, but tonnages and copper grades have been estimated. With the exception of the Turkey Creek deposit, the copper-only deposits commonly have a significant thickness of supergene material, where carbonate has been leached from the rock, reducing hardness and density, and the copper occurs as native-copper, chalcocite, and other low-sulphur copper species. The carbonate-leached zone is separated from the underlying sulphide zone by a thin transition zone. Each of these mineralogical zones has been modelled so that resources can be estimated for each and the appropriate metallurgical recoveries can be applied for reserve estimation.
Source:
p.36, 37
Summary:
Conventional open pit mining methods, which include drilling, blasting, loading, and hauling, will be employed at the Eva Copper Project open pits. The Eva Copper Project is estimated to have a two- year construction period, one of which is pre-production mining. Mining activities are based on open pit mining of the Little Eva deposit at a rate of 31,200 t/d of ore. This primary pit at Little Eva will be supplemented by progressively mining six satellite pit areas at Blackard, Scanlan, Turkey Creek, Bedford North and South, Lady Clayre, and Ivy Ann, to achieve a minimum 11.4 Mt/a mill feed rate.
The mining method involves a 13.4 Mt pre-strip of a starter pit at Little Eva, which includes 1.2 Mt of ore. To sustain a 31,200 t/d production rate during the mine life, stripping will continue at slightly elevated rates for several months after production commences. There will be three pushback pits in Little Eva, three pushbacks at Blackard, and two pushback pits in Turkey Creek, while Bedford, Scanlan, Lady Clayre, and Ivy Ann will have one phase of mining.
Drilling will be carried out using conventional drill and blast (D&B) blasthole drills with diesel-powered front shovel excavation, and off-highway dump truck haulage. The initial main mining fleet consists of two front shovels with 22-m3 buckets and an operating weight of 400-tonnes each, matched to fourteen (Year -2 and Year -1) 141-tonne off-highway rear dump trucks. This fleet is supplemented by the standard support equipment composed of, but not limited to, track dozers, water trucks, graders, front-end loaders (FELs), light vehicles, and service equipment. Ore haulage from the Scanlan and Lady Clayre satellite pits will be accomplished with the same mining fleet as discussed above.
Approximately 381 Mt of mine waste will be transported to dumps adjacent to each of the pits, or to the TSF for construction. The TSF is expected to require approximately 65 Mt of mine waste. Waste will also be used to construct an engineered creek diversion channel and flood protection bund around the Little Eva pit, known as the Cabbage Tree Creek (CTC) Bund. The channel and bund will redirect wet season water flows in Cabbage Tree Creek away from the Little Eva pit. Diversion bunds and ditches will also be built around the other open pits, where needed.
The ROM ore will be delivered to the ROM pad, where there will be the capability to direct feed from mine trucks to a gyratory crusher with 600 kW of installed power capable of accepting 1-m diameter rock at a rate of 1,733 t/h (75% crusher availability).
The current mining schedule then prioritizes the mining of ore sequentially from Little Eva, Blackard, Scanlan, and Turkey Creek. The other satellite deposits (Lady Clayre, Bedford, and Ivy Ann), which only account for 5% of the Mineral Reserves, will commence mining towards the middle to end of the mine life. The proximity of Turkey Creek to the mill makes it preferable to mine it early in the mining schedule. Further investigation and rescheduling will be carried out prior to project commencement.
Mining of ore from the Bedford pits (North and South) is scheduled to commence in Year 4 and Year 5. Lady Clayre pits are scheduled to be mined in years six to eight, and Ivy Ann in Year 5 through Year 6. As noted previously, three of the satellite pits are quite small compared to the Little Eva and Blackard pits.
Dewatering of the open pits will be required. A plan of dewatering wells, horizontal drains, and sumps is envisioned. A detailed plan will be developed during the Project’s development period. It has been estimated that the Little Eva pit dewatering will discharge approximately 4,000 m3/d, and the Blackard pit dewatering approximately 2,000 m3/d. This water is slated to be used as make-up water in the processing plant.
Source:

- subscription is required.
Processing
- Jig plant
- Gravity separation
- Flotation
- Filter press
Flow Sheet:
Source:
Summary:
The Eva Copper Project, comprising Little Eva, Blackard, and other satellite deposits, has been developed based on the mine plan for a nominal combined mining rate of approximately 31,200 t/d copper ore, equivalent to 11.4 Mt/a, with direct feeding of the ore to the processing plant. The processing plant was designed to produce a marketable concentrate with a grade of 28% Cu (and 3 g/t Au when treating gold-bearing ores) using conventional recovery methods, including crushing, grinding, gravity concentration, flotation, and tailings disposal.
The throughput of 31,200 t/d of copper ore was developed for a feed blend consisting of 75% sulphide ores and 25% native copper ores.
The process description that follows is based on the nominal throughput of 31,200 t/d. The key
process units are the following:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary crushing.
- Ball milling in closed-circuit with cyclones, which includes a jigging circuit.
- Rougher flotation circuit.
- Rougher concentrate regrind mill in closed circuit with cyclones and a gravity circuit
- Cleaner, recleaner, and cleaner-scavenger DFR circuit.
- Gravity concentrate dewatering and sun-drying paddock.
- Flotation concentrate thickening, filtration, and storage.
- Gravity and flotation concentrate dispatch.
- Tailings thickening and disposal.
- Process and fresh water circuits.
Jigging
The two blanks are dedicated to feed the rougher jigs (1 blank per rougher jig). A portion of the cyclone cluster feed (typically 15%) gravitates to the rougher jigs, which consist of two IPJ3500 inline pressure jigs. The rougher jigs produce a concentrate that requires further upgrading, and reports to the cleaner jig. The cleaner jig is a single IPJ2400 inline pressure jig. The cleaner gravity concentrate gravitates to the recleaner jig. Both rougher and cleaner jig tailings gravitate to the cyclone feed pump box.
The recleaner jig consists of a single IPJ1000 inline pressure jig. Tailings from the recleaner jig report to the recleaner jig tailings tank, from where they are pumped and recirculated to the cleaner jig. Concentrate from the recleaner jig reports to the gravity concentrate dewatering cone.
Flotation and Flotation Concentrate Regrind Circuits
The flotation circuit consists of conventional rougher flotation followed by rougher concentrate regrind, and a cleaner, recleaner, and cleaner-scavenger DFR circuit to produce a final flotation concentrate. The flotation area of the plant will include the following:
- Conventional rougher flotation followed by rougher concentrate regrind, and a cleaner, recleaner, and cleaner-scavenger DFR circuit to produce a final flotation concentrate.
- Six conventional forced-air addition 300 m3 rougher flotation tank cells. The rougher concentrate flows by gravity to the regrind circuit, and the rougher tailings reports to the tailings thickener via a metallurgical sampler.
- Rougher concentrate is directed to a regrind tower mill operating with circulating load of 150% in closed circuit with a cyclone cluster.
- The regrind cyclone cluster has six ports, with four 400 mm diameter operating cyclones and two in standby. The cyclones operate at 80 kPa, producing a cyclone overflow particle size of P80 48 µm. The regrind cyclone overflow reports to the cleaner flotation head tank.
- A continuous gravity concentrator has been included in the rougher concentrate regrind circuit. The gravity concentrator, treating 25 t/h of solids, has been sized for this application, and processes approximately 16% of the regrind cyclone underflow stream. The resulting concentrate reports directly to the gravity concentrate dewatering cone.
- The cleaner circuit consists of two 18 m3 DFRs. The cleaner DFRs produce a high-grade concentrate that reports to the final flotation concentrate pump box, while the tailings flow to the cleaner-scavenger DFRs.
- The cleaner-scavenger circuit consists of six 18 m3 DFRs. Concentrate from the cleaner-scavenger DFRs is pumped to the recleaner DFRs, while the tailings are pumped to the tailings thickener via a metallurgical sampler.
- The recleaner circuit consists of three 6 m3 DFRs. The recleaner concentrate reports to the final flotation concentrate pump box, and tailings are pumped to the regrind cyclone feed pump box.
- An on-stream analyzer (OSA) and associated multiplexer is included for online process control and sampling.
- Flotation collector (PAX) is added to the ball mill and rougher and cleaner flotation. Frother (MIBC or Polyfroth H27) is added to the rougher, cleaner, and cleaner-scavenger flotation as required. Sulphidizer (NaHS) is added to the two last rougher flotation cells.
Gravity Concentrate Handling
The gravity concentrate handling area of the plant is summarized as follows:
- A 1.8 m diameter gravity concentrate dewatering cone receives the concentrate from the recleaner jig and Knelson concentrator. The dewatering cone overflow solution is recovered and sent to the flotation concentrate thickener. Gravity concentrate solids settle for collection at the underflow cone at a density of 70% solids.
- The dewatering cone underflow gravity flows to the gravity concentrate paddock, where the remaining moisture will evaporate.
Flotation Concentrate Handling
The flotation concentrate handling area of the plant is summarized as follows:
- A 16 m diameter high-rate concentrate thickener, including a Frothbuster system to minimize foam and concentrate loss, is included in the design. The concentrate thickener underflow density has been specified as 65% solids. Flocculant is added to facilitate settling and limit suspended solids in the supernatant solution. Overflow solution from the concentrate thickener is recycled as process water to the primary cyclone pump box to utilize the presence of residual flotation reagents.
- The design specification is for an automatic pressure filter (horizontal filter press) with a filtration area of 140 m2 (using sixty-two 1.5 x 1.5 m plates) and air drying, to achieve a concentrate filter cake with 9% moisture, operating at an availability of 65%, with a cycle time of 12.5 minutes.
Concentrate Storage and Load-Out
Gravity and flotation concentrates will be stored and transported separately:
- A covered building provides storage for up to 2,400 tonnes of flotation concentrate (equivalent to three to four days of production at design rates) and a FEL is used to optimize concentrate storage within the building. Flotation concentrate is loaded into trucks by FELs. Trucks are positioned on a scale prior to loading. The scale provides feedback to the FEL operators as the trucks are filled. When trucks are full, they drive through a wheel wash, and then the concentrate is transported to an off-site facility in half-height sealed containers.
- The gravity concentrate paddock provides storage of up to 200 tonnes of gravity concentrate. The gravity concentrate paddock has two compartments, each with capacity of 100 tonnes. While concentrate fills one compartment during a period of 11 days, the gravity concentrate in the other compartment dries out and is loaded into a truck by a FEL, similarly to the procedure described for the flotation concentrate. The proportion of copper production as gravity concentrate is anticipated to vary significantly over the life of mine; therefore, the residence time provided by the drying paddocks is estimated based on the nominal mill feed blend composition and corresponding testwork results.
Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | Avg. LOM |
Copper
|
Recovery Rate, %
| 87 |
Copper
|
Head Grade, %
| 0.46 |
Copper
|
Concentrate Grade, %
| 28 |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| 78 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| 0.05 |
Gold
|
Concentrate Grade, g/t
| 3 |
Projected Production:
Commodity | Product | Units | Avg. Annual | LOM |
Copper
|
Payable metal
|
M lbs
| | 1,437 |
Copper
|
Metal in concentrate
|
M lbs
| 99 | 1,497 |
Copper
|
Concentrate
|
kt
| 163 | 2,425 |
Gold
|
Payable metal
|
koz
| | 192 |
Gold
|
Metal in copper conc.
|
koz
| 14 | 203 |
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Stripping / waste ratio
| 2.2 * |
Daily mining rate
| 98,200 t * |
Daily ore mining rate
| 31,200 t * |
Waste tonnes, LOM
| 380,574 kt * |
Ore tonnes mined, LOM
| 170,386 kt * |
Total tonnes mined, LOM
| 550,959 kt * |
Annual production capacity
| 194 dmt of copper concentrate * |
Daily processing rate
| 31,200 t * |
Tonnes processed, LOM
| 170,386 kt * |
Annual processing rate
| 11.4 Mt * |
Annual ore mining rate
| 11.4 Mt * |
Mining scale, tpd
| 98,200 t |
Processing scale, tpd
| 31,200 t |
* According to 2020 study.
Reserves at January 31, 2020:
Mineral Resources are reported at 0.17% Cu Cut-off Grade.
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
92,623 kt
|
Copper
|
0.48 %
|
975 M lbs
|
Proven
|
92,623 kt
|
Gold
|
0.05 g/t
|
144 koz
|
Probable
|
78,425 kt
|
Copper
|
0.43 %
|
743 M lbs
|
Probable
|
78,425 kt
|
Gold
|
0.05 g/t
|
115 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
171,047 kt
|
Copper
|
0.46 %
|
1,718 M lbs
|
Proven & Probable
|
171,047 kt
|
Gold
|
0.05 g/t
|
260 koz
|
Measured
|
111,821 kt
|
Copper
|
0.45 %
|
1,110 M lbs
|
Measured
|
111,821 kt
|
Gold
|
0.05 g/t
|
160 koz
|
Indicated
|
148,818 kt
|
Copper
|
0.4 %
|
1,310 M lbs
|
Indicated
|
148,818 kt
|
Gold
|
0.04 g/t
|
172 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
260,659 kt
|
Copper
|
0.42 %
|
2,419 M lbs
|
Measured & Indicated
|
260,659 kt
|
Gold
|
0.04 g/t
|
330 koz
|
Inferred
|
46,267 kt
|
Copper
|
0.42 %
|
428 M lbs
|
Inferred
|
46,267 kt
|
Gold
|
0.04 g/t
|
51 koz
|
Commodity Production Costs:
| Commodity | Units | Average |
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Copper
|
USD
|
1.76 / lb *†
|
C1 cash costs
|
Copper
|
USD
|
1.44 / lb *†
|
Assumed price
|
Copper
|
USD
|
3.04 / lb *
|
Assumed price
|
Gold
|
USD
|
1,362 / oz *
|
* According to 2020 study / presentation.
† Net of By-Product.
Operating Costs:
| Units | 2020 |
OP mining costs ($/t mined)
|
USD
| 1.66 * |
OP mining costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 5.26 * |
Processing costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 5.14 * |
Total operating costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 11.4 * |
* According to 2020 study.
2020 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :
Metrics | Units | LOM Total |
Initial CapEx
|
$M USD
|
443.4
|
Sustaining CapEx
|
$M USD
|
34
|
Closure costs
|
$M USD
|
14.1
|
Total CapEx
|
$M USD
|
491.5
|
OP OpEx
|
$M USD
|
888.7
|
Processing OpEx
|
$M USD
|
868.3
|
G&A costs
|
$M USD
|
95
|
Total OpEx
|
$M USD
|
1,925
|
Total Taxes
|
$M USD
|
447
|
Royalty payments
|
$M USD
|
199.9
|
Net revenue (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
4,311
|
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM)
|
$M USD
|
1,091
|
Pre-tax NPV @ 8%
|
$M USD
|
648
|
After-tax NPV @ 8%
|
$M USD
|
437
|
Pre-tax IRR, %
|
|
37
|
After-tax IRR, %
|
|
29
|
After-tax payback period, years
|
|
2.5
|
Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of January 31, 2020:
Source:
p.371
HME Type | Model | Size | Quantity |
Compactor
|
Komatsu WF450-T
|
|
1
|
Crane
|
|
250 t
|
1
|
Crane
|
|
80 t
|
1
|
Dozer (crawler)
|
Komatsu D375A
|
|
4
|
Dozer (rubber tire)
|
Komatsu WA600-5
|
|
1
|
Drill
|
Epiroc PV271
|
|
2
|
Drill (blasthole)
|
Epiroc DM45
|
|
1
|
Excavator
|
Komatsu PC850-8
|
|
1
|
Grader
|
Komatsu 825A-2
|
|
2
|
Loader
|
Komatsu WA200PZ-6
|
|
1
|
Loader
|
Komatsu WA600-5
|
6.5 cu. m
|
2
|
Loader (FEL)
|
Caterpillar IT 28
|
|
1
|
Loader (FEL)
|
Caterpillar 930G
|
|
1
|
Loader (FEL)
|
Komatsu WA900
|
13 cu. m
|
2
|
Scraper
|
|
24 cu. yd
|
1
|
Shovel
|
Komatsu PC4000
|
22 cu. m
|
3
|
Tire manipulator
|
Komatsu WA600
|
|
1
|
Truck (dump)
|
Komatsu HD1500-7
|
144 t
|
22
|
Truck (dump)
|
Komatsu HM400-3MO
|
|
5
|
Truck (fuel / lube)
|
Komatsu HD605-7
|
|
1
|
Truck (fuel / lube)
|
Caterpillar 775B
|
|
1
|
Truck (water)
|
Komatsu HD605
|
63 t
|
2
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
Chief Operating Officer
|
Don Strickland
|
|
May 6, 2022
|
Consultant - Recovery Methods
|
Paul Staples
|
|
May 7, 2020
|
Mine General Manager
|
Scott Whitehead
|
|
Apr 4, 2022
|
Production Manager
|
Mike Westendorf
|
|
Apr 4, 2022
|
Sr. Vice-President, Project Development
|
Lance Newman
|
|
May 6, 2022
|
Staff:
Total Workforce | Year |
280
|
2020
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations: