Overview
Stage | Permitting |
Mine Type | Open Pit & Underground |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
- Truck & Shovel / Loader
- Room-and-pillar
|
Mine Life | 14 years (as of Jan 1, 2017) |
The Citronen Zinc-Lead Project in northern- Greenland represents one of the world’s largest undeveloped zinc-lead resources with a resource in excess of 13 billion pounds of contained zinc and lead metal. |
Source:
p. 8, 40
On 15 August 2016 the Company incorporated a new Greenland subsidiary namely ‘Ironbark A/S’. The new subsidiary is 100% wholly owned by the Company’s subsidiary “Ironbark Aust Pty Ltd’. The Company has transferred its Citronen Project and associated exploitation licence to this entity.
Contractors
- Subscription is required.
Summary:
The Citronen Deposit is interpreted as belonging to the SEDEX deposit class, forming syn-depositionally with sedimentation.
SEDEX deposits are formed in submarine environments by the precipitation of sulphides from metal bearing fluids introduced onto the seafloor through underlying fractures which act as metal-bearing fluid conduits. Large amounts of sulphur are precipitated principally as pyrite and focused around vent areas or ‘mounds’ on the sea floor. Base metal (Zn + Pb) bearing sulphides at Citronen are predominantly located within laminate horizons surrounding these larger sulphide accumulations.
Mineralisation at the Citronen Fjord Zn-Pb Deposit comprises several distinct sulphide mounds containing massive and net-textured pyrite-rich mineralisation, interpreted to represent the focal point of fluid influx, flanked by pyritic laminated sulphides that are locally sphalerite and galena-rich. These laminated sulphides host the majority of economic grade mineralisation.
The deposit consists of multiple sulphide mounds forming in three lateral positions (“vents”), defined as the Discovery, Beach and Esrum ore bodies.
The mineralisation is hosted within two fine- grained sedimentary units, separated by a mass carbonate debris flow. The majority of mineralisation is stratiform, with semi-massive net-textured to massive sulphides accumulating in the core of the mound structure. Structurally controlled stock-work style minera ........

Mining Methods
- Truck & Shovel / Loader
- Room-and-pillar
Summary:
The ore body’s nature and orientation is well understood and the room and pillar mining method has been selected as the most appropriate for this style of deposit.
With the mining method being room and pillar, a recovery factor of 100% recovery was assumed as ore loss should be negligible provided that a tele-remote bogging system is used for the recovery of the ore drive strip material. The likelihood of ore loss would increase if a line of site remote bogging system was used.
All mining has been planned for conduction via development jumbo and, as such, minimal overbreak (i.e. unplanned dilution) outside of the planned dilution skin is expected. As a result, no tonnage factors were applied to this design.
Open pit mining operations have been scheduled to commence at the end of the life of the underground mine in Year 11 (3.3 Mtpa scenario).
The open pit mining rate to continue to maintain a total ore feed rate of 3.3 Mtpa to the process plant until the open pit is depleted. Mining will utilise 10 x 60t haul trucks and excavators until the point where the project is closed out, subject to the discovery of additional resources.
Source:

- subscription is required.
Flow Sheet:
Summary:

- subscription is required.
Projected Production:
Commodity | Units | Avg. Annual |
Zinc
|
t
| 200,000 |
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Annual mining capacity
| 3.3 Mt of ore * |
Ore tonnes mined, LOM
| 45 Mt * |
Plant annual capacity
| 3.3 Mt * |
Mining scale, tpd
| 9,000 t |
* According to 2017 study.
Reserves at September 14, 2020:
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
7.8 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.9 %
|
0.5 Mt
|
Proven
|
7.8 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.6 %
|
0.04 Mt
|
Proven
|
7.8 Mt
|
Zinc Equivalent
|
6.3 %
|
0.5 Mt
|
Probable
|
13.5 Mt
|
Zinc
|
6 %
|
0.8 Mt
|
Probable
|
13.5 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.4 %
|
0.06 Mt
|
Probable
|
13.5 Mt
|
Zinc Equivalent
|
6.3 %
|
0.8 Mt
|
Proven & Probable
|
21.3 Mt
|
Zinc
|
6 %
|
1.3 Mt
|
Proven & Probable
|
21.3 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.5 %
|
0.1 Mt
|
Proven & Probable
|
21.3 Mt
|
Zinc Equivalent
|
6.3 %
|
1.3 Mt
|
Measured
|
25 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5 %
|
|
Measured
|
25 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.5 %
|
|
Indicated
|
26.5 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.5 %
|
|
Indicated
|
26.5 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.5 %
|
|
Inferred
|
19.3 Mt
|
Zinc
|
4.9 %
|
|
Inferred
|
19.3 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.4 %
|
|
Total Resource
|
70.8 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.1 %
|
|
Total Resource
|
70.8 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.5 %
|
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
- Subscription is required.