Source:
p. 8, 27
Somincor-Sociedade Mineira de Neves-Corvo, S.A., is a 100% owned subsidiary of Lundin Mining.
Deposit Type
- VMS
- Breccia pipe / Stockwork
- Vein / narrow vein
Summary:
The mineral deposits at Neves-Corvo are classified as volcano-sedimentary massive sulphide (VMS). They typically occur as lenses of polymetallic (Cu, Zn, Sn, Pb) massive sulphides that formed at or near the seafloor in submarine volcanic environments. They formed from accumulations of the focussed discharges of hot metal-enriched fluids associated with seafloor hydrothermal convection, typically in tectonic areas of active submarine volcanism, including rift spreading centres and island arc subduction zones. The massive sulphide lenses are commonly underlain by sulphide-silicate stockwork vein systems, although the stockwork systems may extend into the hanging-wall strata above the massive sulphide lenses. The immediate host rocks can be either volcanic or sedimentary. The deposits are overlain by a repetition of volcano-sedimentary and flysch units.
VMS deposits readily accommodate strain during regional deformation because of the ductile nature of massive sulphide bodies, and can therefore display much higher degrees of recrystallisation and remobilisation than the surrounding volcanic and sedimentary strata. The tectonic remobilisation may result in duplication of the stratigraphy further localising the sulphide mineralisation.
Six massive sulphide mineralised zones have been defined within the Neves-Corvo Mining Area and comprise Neves, Corvo, Graça, Zambujal, Lombador and Monte Branco. The Semblana massive sulphide zone is located within the Semblana Mining Area and is located 1.3km northeast of Zambujal.
The mineralised zones lie on both flanks of the Rosario-Neves-Corvo anticline. The mineralised zones of Neves, Corvo, Graça, Zambujal and Lombador are connected by thin massive sulphide “bridges” over the crest of the fold and are conformable with the stratigraphy. Within the area of these five main deposits this has resulted in an almost continuous complex volume of mineralised rock showing a large range in both style of mineralisation and geological structure. The mineralised zones are located at depths of 230m to 1,400m below surface.
The mineral deposits occur as concentrations of high-grade copper and/or zinc mineralisation within massive sulphide pyritic lenses, and copper mineralisation within stockwork zones that typically underlie the massive sulphide. Base metal grade distributions within the massive copper/zinc sulphide lenses typically show good internal continuity, but laterally can terminate abruptly in barren pyrite. The massive sulphide deposits are generally very large, regular, continuous and predictable. However the geometry of the high-grade zinc and copper zones within the deposits can be very complex. In many cases, boundaries between ore grade mineralisation and barren pyrite may be almost parallel to the stratigraphic contacts of the sulphide lens.
The base metal grades are segregated by a strong metal zoning into copper, tin and zinc zones, as well as barren massive pyrite. Three styles of mineralisation have been identified at Neves-Corvo:
- Rubané mineralisation - characterised by thin banded alternations of shales, breccias and massive sulphide or tin mineralisation (found mainly in Corvo but now predominantly mined out);
- Massive sulphide mineralisation; and
- Stockwork (fissural) sulphide mineralisation.
Mining Methods
- Bench & Fill
- Drift & Fill
- Paste backfill
Summary:
The ZEP (Zinc Expansion Project) assumes maintaining the mining methods unaltered in the existing areas. In the expansion area LP2 (Lombador Phase 2) the mining method used for mining zinc ores is optimised bench and fill (OBF) as per LP1.
The development of the Lombador decline ramp provided access for further geological drilling of deeper areas of the resource, which identified further extensions to the Lombador orebody. Subsequent analysis indicated that additional zinc Mineral Reserves would be required to justify further expanding the zinc processing plant. It was also recognised that to achieve effective and economic production from the new deeper area, it would require a new underground materials handling system to more efficiently transport ore from a depth of approximately 1,200m below surface, this system upgrade forms an integral part of what has been termed; Lombador Phase 2 (“LP2”).
Two mining methods make up the majority of production at Neves-Corvo, these being Drift and-Fill and Bench-and-Fill stoping. Both of these methods have been well adapted and tailored to the large but locally complex high grade ores present throughout the operations.
Drift-and-fill was the original mining method selected for Neves-Corvo. Although the method has relatively low productivity rates and high unit costs, it was chosen because it is highly flexible and can achieve high recovery rates in high grade orebodies with complex and flat dipping geometries. The initial copper reserves at Neves-Corvo, largely in the Graça and Upper Corvo orebodies, averaged in excess of 8.0%Cu and it was important to select a method that extracted all of this high grade mineralisation.
Drift-and-fill stopes at Neves-Corvo are normally accessed from a footwall ramp with footwall access drives driven along the orebody strike at 20m vertical intervals. Access crosscuts are driven down from the footwall access drives in to the orebody. A horizontal slice is subsequently mined using drifts developed either longitudinally or transversely in sequence. Standard drift dimensions are 5.0m x 5.0m, with the sidewalls often being slashed before backfilling. Following completion of a drift it is tightly backfilled with hydraulic sand fill or Paste fill before the drift alongside is mined. When a complete 5m high orebody slice is mined and filled, the back of the access drive is “slashed” down and mining recommences on the level above.
Drift-and-Fill is generally applied to areas of the mine with a mining thickness of less than 10m and has become the prevalent mining method at Neves-Corvo as the thicker parts of the orebodies that are more suitable for bench and fill mining have become depleted.
The bench-and-fill mining method has long been used at Neves-Corvo in areas where the mineralisation is of sufficient thickness and continuity. The method is more productive and has lower operating costs than drift and fill mining. The method is generally applied in areas of the orebodies greater than 20m in vertical thickness.
Bench-and-fill stopes are also accessed from a footwall ramp, with footwall drives driven along strike in waste at 20m vertical intervals. Upper and lower access crosscuts are driven across the orebody to the hangingwall contact.
The top access is normally opened up to the full 12m stope width and appropriate support installed, including cablebolts and shotcrete as required. A slot raise is opened at the hangingwall end of the stope and is then enlarged, providing free face for the whole width of the stope. Vertical rings of large diameter drill holes are then drilled and blasted on retreat to the footwall. Loading of the broken ore takes place from the lower access using remote-controlled load-haul-dump vehicles.
Primary BF stopes have been mined up to 120m long, but secondary stopes are more typically broken in to 30 to 40m across-dip lengths before being backfilled. The stopes are normally mined in an up-dip primary-secondary sequence. Primary stopes are normally filled with cemented paste fill and then tightly filled with hydraulic sand fill. Secondary stopes are filled with either waste rock or low cement paste fill and then also tight filled with hydraulic sand fill, with the exception being in the Lombador area, where hydraulic fill has not been used.
Following the satisfactory completion of the backfilling process for each BF stope, the back of the former drilling level is slashed out to establish a new mucking level for the next stope above.
Plans are in place to alter the BF mining method slightly in some areas by no longer slashing out the backs of former drilling levels when creating subsequent mucking levels. Instead, mucking levels would be created by mining through or on-top of the in-situ backfill in the drill drives and re establishing the existing excavation.
Mini bench-and-fill (MBF) is a hybrid method providing greater productivity than conventional driftand-fill where orebody thicknesses are between 10-15m. Accesses are again developed in the footwall via ramps and footwall drives. In mini bench-and-fill, drilling and mucking take place on different horizons but from opposing ends with crosscuts 5 to 10m apart vertically.
A sill pillar mining method was developed at Neves-Corvo to extract the ore remaining in sill pillars created between up-dip mining panels.
From the footwall access a central crosscut is developed through the orebody to the hangingwall and is heavily supported with cablebolts breaking in to the fill above, close pattern rockbolting and shotcrete. A hangingwall access is then driven along the strike of the orebody outside the overlying backfill and from this drive crosscutting drifts are developed to the footwall contact.
This final 8m thick slice beneath the overlying backfill is removed in two stages, one slice of 5m when the normal drift is developed in advance and then a final 3m slice, which is blasted down from the roof of this drift in retreat. This final slice is slashed off the back and rapidly backfilled using CRF applied with a slinger truck to fill achieve as tight a fill as possible from a safe, remote position. Successive crosscutting drifts are then mined back to the central access drive accordingly. Up to 95% ore recovery of some high-grade sill pillars has been achieved using this method.
Note that LP2 has a zinc orebody with a lower net smelter return in comparison to the previous and current Neves-Corvo copper orebodies. Therefore, this high cost extraction method is not envisaged for use in LP2.
Crusher / Mill Type | Model | Size | Power | Quantity |
Jaw crusher
|
|
750 x 500
|
|
1
|
Cone crusher
|
.......................
|
60"
|
|
3
|
Cone crusher
|
.......................
|
|
|
2
|
Ball mill
|
|
3m x 4.1m
|
600 kW
|
2
|
Ball mill
|
.......................
|
4.1m x 6.7m
|
1600 kW
|
2
|
Ball mill
|
.......................
|
4.1m x 5.5m
|
1200 kW
|
2
|
Rod mill
|
|
|
|
1
|
Rod mill
|
.......................
|
3.8m x 5.5m
|
1000 kW
|
1
|
Rod mill
|
|
3m x 5.6m
|
650 kW
|
1
|
Rod mill
|
|
3.81 x 4.87m
|
900 kW
|
1
|
Stirred mill
|
.......................
|
|
930 kW
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
The ZEP (Zinc Expansion Project) Feasibility Study has examined further expanding zinc plant throughput capacity to 2.5 mtpa coupled with the development of LP2. The forecast increase in zinc ore production will be sourced by maximizing production from the existing zinc mining areas and by mining from LP2.
The mine has been a significant producer of copper and zinc using conventional flowsheets consisting of crushing, grinding and flotation. There are two processing plants, namely the Copper Plant and the Zinc Plant.
The installed capacity of the Copper Plant is 2.5Mtpa. To achieve this throughput the plant is manned continuously using a five-shift rotating roster. The operation starts at the coarse ore stockpiles, through pre-screening, crushing, grinding, flotation, filtration to concentrate storage and despatch and includes utilities and tailings management.
The Pre–Screen, installed upstream of the crusher circuit, is designed to remove the fines fraction (<19mm) existing in the run-of-mine ore. This increases the efficiency of the crushing circuit, especially when the ore has a high moisture content. The circuit consists of a Metso TS502 double deck screen, with a nominal capacity of 800tph.
Screen oversize is reclaimed by the front end loader and fed into the crushing circuit either alone, or mixed with run of mine ore, this is then conveyed to a 60” ‘Superior’ primary crusher. All ore passes through the crusher to two 20’ x 8’ Allis Chalmers Screens.
Screen undersize at <19mm passes via a conveyor to the fine ore silo. Screen oversize passes to two 60” ‘hydrocone’ crushers and the crushed product conveyed again to the screens.
The primary grinding circuit (Line 1) consists of a rod mill (Allis 3.8 x 5.5m with 1000kW) in open circuit and a primary and secondary ball mill (Allis 4.1 x 6.7m rubber lined with 1600kW) in closed circuit with hydrocyclones, Sala 20” for the primary and Sala 10” for secondary. Secondary cyclone overflow, at 80% passing 40 µm passes to the flotation circuit.
The second grinding line (Line 2) is fed by front-end loader from the fine ore stockpile adjacent to the silo. The circuit consists of a Rod Mill (3.0m x 5.6m, with 650kW) in open circuit and a primary ball mill (Allis 4.1 x 5.5m rubber lined with 1200kw) in closed circuit with Sala 20” hydrocyclones. Cyclone overflow, at 80% passing 45µm passes to the Flotation circuit.
From the primary grinding circuit the slurry passes through two aerator conditioners (2 Dorr-Oliver 38m3 cells) to the flotation circuit, 62 cells of 17m3 and 12 of 38m3, all Dorr Oliver.
Concentrate from the first bank of rougher #1 (3 cells of 17m3) feeds the first cleaner, but can optionally go to the regrinding. The remaining three banks of roughers #1 and #2 (11 cells of 17m3) can either go to the regrind (normal) or to the first cleaner. Rougher tailings feed the coarse scavenger (6 cells of 38m3 ), which produce a concentrate that goes to the regrind; tailings from this section feeds the RC circuit.
Slurry from the second grinding line feeds a bank of 6 x 38m3 cells for roughing and 7 x 17m3 cells for cleaning. Cleaner concentrate then feeds the regrind circuit of the main cleaner circuit, while rougher tailings feed into the main line scavenger cells.
The Cleaners have 3 stages, with 17m3 cells, 9 on the First, 7 on the Second and 4 on the Third. The final 3rd Cleaner concentrate contains 23-24% Cu and goes to Filtration. The tailings of the 1st Cleaner then goes to the regrind circuit.
After regrinding the slurry feeds the Regrind Rougher. This has 7 cells of 17m3 that produce a concentrate feeding the 1st cleaner and a tail feeding the Fine Scavenger. This Fine Scavenger has 7 cells of 17m3; concentrate goes to the regrind and tailings feed to the RC circuit.
The circuit consists of a bulk rougher/cleaner stage of 10 + 3 17m3 flotation cells. Concentrate feeds an M3000 Isa Mill to regrind the concentrates to < 10µm. Reground product is then conditioned with MBS to depress zinc, and floated in 8m3 cells to produce a copper concentrate. This concentrate represents a further 3% in copper recovery. Copper sulphate is then added to activate the sphalerite, and a zinc concentrate is produced in a circuit with 2-stage cleaning.
Final copper concentrate is pumped to a 40m diameter thickener where it is thickened to 65-68% solids before passing to the Filter Plant Storage Tank. From the tank the slurry is pumped on demand to the five Sala VPA 1530-40 Pressure Filters with a capacity of 25dtph each. Normal operation uses four filters, with one on stand-by for maintenance.
The Zinc Plant has a zinc ore treatment design capacity of 1.0Mtpa. The ore is treated using a sequential copper, lead and zinc flowsheet. The copper concentrate may be filtered, if of satisfactory quality, or pumped to the copper ore treatment cleaner circuits.
Run-of-mine (ROM) ore is dumped from the mine stacker to the ore park. The ore is fed to a pre-screen for screening at 20mm. The oversize reports to the primary jaw crusher (750 x 500mm) while the undersize reports directly to one of the fine ore silos. The crushed coarse ore is conveyed to the secondary cone crusher (Standard H400 cone). The conveyor system has a rated capacity of 200tph. The secondary crusher product is conveyed to the tertiary crusher screen with the oversize (+20mm) reporting to the tertiary cone crusher (H400 Shorthead cone) and the undersize reporting to the fine ore bin.
The crushed ore is reclaimed from one of three 500t ore silos via three feeders and fed to the rod mill feed conveyor. The grinding circuit consists of a single line consisting of a 3.81m diameter by 4.87m long rod mill (900kW), and two 3.00m diameter by 4.10m long (600kW) primary ball mills and a single stirred mill (930kW). The rod mill product is pumped to the ball mill circuit via two feed distributors (one operating and one standby), fo distribution to two primary ball mill sumps. The rod mill discharge, together with the ball mill discharge, is pumped to cyclone clusters for classification. The cyclone clusters operate in closed circuit with the ball mills. The cyclone overflow, at a P80 product size of 200µm, is fed to the secondary grinding mill circuit. The cyclone underflow returns to the ball mills.
Copper flotation takes place in four 20m3 tank cells. The copper rougher concentrate is reground in a 2.4 x 3.0m ball mill and cleaned in a bank of copper “re-cleaner” flotation machines (7 x 8m3 cells). The copper re-cleaner concentrate is pumped to the copper first cleaner (5 x 8m3 cells). The copper first cleaner concentrate is pumped to the copper second cleaner (4 x 8m3 cells). The copper first cleaner tails are returned to the regrinding circuit. The copper second cleaner concentrate is the final copper concentrate and is pumped to the copper plant thickener feed tank. The copper second cleaner tail is returned to the copper first cleaner. The copper rougher tailings, together with the copper re-cleaner tailings, report to the lead circuit conditioner tank.
The lead rougher concentrate, combined with the lead cleaner tails is reground in a 3m diameter by 4.10m long (600kW) ball mill. The ground lead rougher and lead cleaner tails are pumped and cleaned in the lead re-cleaner flotation machines (13 x 8m3). The lead re-cleaner concentrate is pumped to the lead first cleaner cells (7 x 8m3cells).
The lead first cleaner concentrate is cleaned in the lead second cleaner cells (5 x 8m3). Thelead second cleaner concentrate passes to a third cleaning stage consisting of 7 x 3m3 cells.The third cleaner concentrate is pumped to an 18m3 column. The final lead column concentrate is currently pumped to final tailings.
Zinc roughing takes place in five 40m3 tank cells. The rougher concentrate is ground in a stirred mill and pumped to a bank of 6 x 40m3 zinc re-cleaner flotation machines.
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The ZEP (Zinc Expansion Project) Feasibility Study has examined further expanding zinc plant throughput capacity to 2.5 mtpa coupled with the development of LP2. The forecast increase in zinc ore production will be sourced by maximizing production from the existing zinc mining areas and by mining from LP2.
In October 2015, SOMINCOR, in conjunction with AMEC, completed the ZEP FS aimed at increasing zinc ore production from the current 1.1Mtpa to 2.5Mtpa. The processing component of the study included an assessment of:
- New surface zinc ore stockpiles (principal stockpile covered) and a materials handling system feeding the mill;
- An expanded zinc processing plant, including a new building for grinding (new SAG Mill and VertiMill) and flotation; upgrades to flotation in the existing plant; expanded zinc and lead thickeners and filters; new blowers; expanded compressed air systems; new tailings cyclones and pumping; upgraded and expanded process control systems; an ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | Avg. LOM |
Zinc
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  |
Zinc
|
Head Grade, %
| 7.5 |
Copper
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  |
Copper
|
Head Grade, %
| 2.4 |
Lead
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  |
Lead
|
Head Grade, %
| 1.9 |
- Subscription is required.
Projected Production:
Commodity | Units | Avg. Annual | LOM |
Zinc
|
kt
| 150 | 1,571 |
Copper
|
kt
| ......  | ......  |
Lead
|
kt
| ......  | ......  |
All production numbers are expressed as metal in concentrate.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Plant annual capacity
| ......  |
Tonnes processed, LOM
| ......  |
Tonnes processed, LOM
| ......  |
Tonnes processed, LOM
| ......  |
* According to 2017 study.
Reserves at June 30, 2019:
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
4,172 kt
|
Zinc
|
8.7 %
|
361 kt
|
Proven
|
4,172 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
12 kt
|
Proven
|
4,172 kt
|
Lead
|
2.3 %
|
94 kt
|
Proven
|
4,172 kt
|
Silver
|
75 g/t
|
10 M oz
|
Probable
|
25,497 kt
|
Zinc
|
7.3 %
|
1,853 kt
|
Probable
|
25,497 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
86 kt
|
Probable
|
25,497 kt
|
Lead
|
1.7 %
|
445 kt
|
Probable
|
25,497 kt
|
Silver
|
62 g/t
|
51 M oz
|
Proven & Probable
|
29,669 kt
|
Zinc
|
7.5 %
|
2,214 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
29,669 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
98 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
29,669 kt
|
Lead
|
1.8 %
|
540 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
29,669 kt
|
Silver
|
64 g/t
|
61 M oz
|
Measured
|
10,937 kt
|
Zinc
|
8 %
|
879 kt
|
Measured
|
10,937 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
34 kt
|
Measured
|
10,937 kt
|
Lead
|
1.8 %
|
195 kt
|
Measured
|
10,937 kt
|
Silver
|
69 g/t
|
24 M oz
|
Indicated
|
60,507 kt
|
Zinc
|
6.7 %
|
4,079 kt
|
Indicated
|
60,507 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
208 kt
|
Indicated
|
60,507 kt
|
Lead
|
1.4 %
|
838 kt
|
Indicated
|
60,507 kt
|
Silver
|
60 g/t
|
117 M oz
|
Inferred
|
3,828 kt
|
Zinc
|
5.8 %
|
223 kt
|
Inferred
|
3,828 kt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
13 kt
|
Inferred
|
3,828 kt
|
Lead
|
1.5 %
|
56 kt
|
Inferred
|
3,828 kt
|
Silver
|
62 g/t
|
8 M oz
|
Commodity Production Costs:
| Commodity | Units | Average |
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Zinc
|
USD
|
0.42 / lb *†
|
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Copper
|
USD
|
0.8 / lb *†
|
C1 cash costs
|
Zinc
|
USD
|
0.29 / lb *†
|
C1 cash costs
|
Copper
|
USD
|
0.28 / lb *†
|
Assumed price
|
Lead
|
USD
|
0.9 / lb *
|
Assumed price
|
Zinc
|
USD
|
1.03 / lb *
|
Assumed price
|
Copper
|
USD
|
2.91 / lb *
|
* According to 2017 study / presentation.
† Net of By-Product.
Operating Costs:
| Units | 2017 |
UG mining costs ($/t mined)
|
EUR
| 24.1 * |
Processing costs ($/t milled)
|
EUR
| ......  |
Total operating costs ($/t milled)
|
EUR
| ......  |
* According to 2017 study.
- Subscription is required.
2017 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :
Metrics | Units | LOM Total |
Pre-Production capital costs
|
$M EUR
|
......
|
Sustaining CapEx
|
$M EUR
|
......
|
Total OpEx
|
$M USD
|
......
|
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM)
|
$M EUR
|
......
|
After-tax NPV @ 0%
|
$M EUR
|
......
|
After-tax NPV @ 8%
|
$M EUR
|
......
|
After-tax IRR, %
|
|
......
|
After-tax payback period, years
|
|
......
|
- Subscription is required.
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
.......................
|
.......................
|
|
Mar 2, 2021
|
- Subscription is required.
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
News:
Aerial view:
- Subscription is required.