Overview
Stage | Production |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
On-Site Camp |
3,000 beds Source:  |
Production Start | 2005 |
Mine Life | 2027 |
The Phase 6 leach pad expansion was successfully commissioned in the second quarter of 2021, in line with guidance. In November 2021, the Board of Minera Andina del Sol approved the Phase 7A leach pad construction project. Construction of Phase 7B will commence following the completion of Phase 7A. Construction on both phases will include sub-drainage and monitoring, leak collection and recirculation, impermeabilization, and pregnant leaching solution collection. As of March 31, 2022, construction of Phase 7A progressed to 48% by the end of the first quarter of 2022. The first two sectors (of four) will be ready for ore stacking during the middle of 2022. The remaining two sectors are not required for production until 2023. Subject to approval by the board of Minera Andina del Sol, construction of Phase 7B is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2022. |
Source:
p. 90
On June 30, 2017, Barrick completed the sale of a 50% interest in Veladero to Shandong Gold. Veladero is now a JV between Barrick and Shandong and has rebranded itself as Minera Andina del Sol.
Shandong Gold and Barrick now each have an indirect 50% ownership interest in Minera Andina del Sol SRL (“MAS”) (formerly, Minera Argentina Gold SRL), which owns and operates the Mine.
Source:
p.54-61
Summary:
The Veladero deposit is a high sulphidation epithermal gold-silver deposit hosted by volcaniclastic sediments, tuffs, and volcanic breccias related to a Miocene diatreme-dome complex. Hydrothermal alteration is typical of high sulphidation gold deposits, with a silicified core grading outward into advanced argillic alteration, then into peripheral argillic and propylitic alteration haloes. Gold occurs as fine native grains, and is dominantly associated with silicification and with iron oxide or iron sulfate fracture coatings. Silver mineralization is distinct from gold, and occurs as a broader, more diffuse envelope, probably representing a separate mineralizing event. Copper and other base metals are insignificant, and sulphide mineralization is negligible. Principal controls on gold mineralization are structures, brecciation, alteration, host rocks, and elevation (Barrick, 2005).
Precious metal mineralization at Veladero is controlled by stratigraphy, structural trends, and elevation. Disseminated gold mineralization forms a 400 m to 700 m wide by three kilometre long tabular blanket localized between the 3,950 m and 4,400 m elevations. Veladero has been separated into three main sectors, Amable in the south, Cuatro Esquinas in the centre and Filo Federico to the north. All sectors of the deposit are characterized by the same high sulphidation style of mineralization.
The mineralized envelope encompassing greater than 0.2 g/t Au is oriented along a 345°- trending regional structural corridor. The mineralization is dominantly hosted in the diatreme breccias along the fault-bounded northwest trend. Within this trend, higher grade mineralized shoots, averaging approximately 4 g/t Au but with one metre values up to 100 g/t, with lengths of 300 m to 500 m, form along northeast striking structural trends and are surrounded by a halo of lower grade mineralization ranging between 0.1 g/t Au and 1.0 g/t Au.
A mostly barren zone approximately 300 m long occurs between Amable and Cuatro Esquinas. From Cuatro Esquinas north through Filo Federico, the gold mineralization envelope is continuous. The Veladero ore envelope lacks recognized roots or high-grade feeder conduits at depth, and exhibits no evidence for significant supergene enrichment of metals (Barrick, 2005).
Gold mineralization can be hosted by any kind of rock at Veladero, including overburden and steam-heat altered lithologies. Principal host rocks are hydrothermal breccias and felsic tuffs at Filo Federico and Cuatro Esquinas, and pyroclastic breccias and felsic to intermediate tuffs at Amable. Main-stage introduction of gold clearly is younger than diatreme eruption, acid leaching, and major stages of silicification and fracturing. It accompanied or closely followed hypogene deposition of iron oxides and jarosite. Principal controls on localization of gold mineralization are structurally-induced open spaces (fracture zones, structural intersections), favourable host rocks, brecciation, alteration, and elevation.
Gold occurs at Veladero as minute native grains disseminated along fracture surfaces, and usually it is associated with silicification and hematite, goethite, or jarosite. Trace gold telluride minerals have been identified petrographically, but are not significant. Gold grains have been found encapsulated by quartz overgrowths, and also by jarosite. Megascopic gold grains up to one millimetre in size have been recovered from a number of drill holes, but most Veladero gold is less than 50 microns in size. Metallographic studies indicate that the gold contains some silver and that the overall gold purity or millesimal fineness is approximately 800 to 900.
Silver values are consistently anomalous at Veladero. The principal silver-bearing mineral is acanthite (silver sulphide). In addition, grains of native silver, silver chloride, and a silverbearing telluride have been identified in thin sections. Within the ore zone, silver and gold exhibit different distributions: some silver mineralization correlates with gold (Ag:Au ratios generally less 20:1); some silver has no associated gold; and some gold has little to no associated silver. These observations of silver and gold distributions suggest multiple events of precious metal mineralization (Barrick, 2005).
Silver is present as sub five micron size mineralization most typically as silver sulphide, silver chloride (cerargyrite), and native silver with all forms present with varying levels of silica encapsulation.
Source:
p.118-122,126
Summary:
The Veladero Mine is a traditional open pit truck and shovel operation that has been in continuous operation since 2005.
The Veladero area consists of two major pit areas, Amable and Filo Federico, while there is a single pit at Argenta. Current operations are exclusively from the Filo Federico pit of Veladero. Mineral Reserves at Amable were exhausted in 2013, with no future plans to recommence
mining operations in this pit (waste backfilling began in 2014).
Mine operations are exclusively by open pit method, with a fleet of primarily 218-tonne rigid frame haul trucks combined with a variety of diesel powered hydraulic shovels and front end loaders as the primary loading equipment. The haul trucks are also utilized to transport ore to the Valley
Leach Facility (VLF) for placement. Blasting is required other than for the occasional unconsolidated material at the surface when starting a new pushback. A fleet of large diesel-powered blast hole rigs are employed for the production drilling.
The following description of the mining methods refers to the Filo Federico pit and associated infrastructure.
Open pit mining operations are located on steep mountain side slopes in rugged terrain with the majority of planned mining occurring between elevations of 3,900 MASL and 4,600 MASL.
The Filo Federico final pit will measure approximately two kilometers along strike, typically one kilometre across, and have a maximum depth of approximately 750 m. For comparison, the exhausted Amable final pit footprint is circular and measures approximately one kilometre in diameter with a maximum depth of approximately 530 m. The Argenta final pit footprint is approximately one kilometre along strike, typically half a kilometre across, with a maximum depth of approximately 300 m.
The final arrangement of the Veladero Waste Rock Facilities (WRF) is for the continued development of surface dumps along contour to either side of the Filo Federico pit and backfilling of the exhausted Amable pit. Backfilling of the Amable pit began in October 2014.
MINE DESIGN PARAMETERS:
- Haul Road Width 32 m;
- Haul Road Gradient, Maximum 10%;
- Mining Bench Height 15 m;
- Safety Berm Width 7.1 to 19.6 m;
- Bench Face Angle 67 to 80 degrees;
- Inter-ramp Slope Angle 30 to 54 degrees.
The majority of remaining Mineral Reserves are scheduled for crushing prior to placement on the VLF as this typically offers a higher profit margin than ROM placement. ROM ore is hauled directly from the pit to the VLF and direct dumped. The crushing facilities are located approximately 1.5 km east of the final pit rim. After crushing, the ore is transported by mine truck direct to the VLF.
Source:

- subscription is required.
Processing
- Heap leach
- ROM/dump leach
- Merrill–Crowe
- Cyanide (reagent)
Flow Sheet:
p.147-148
Source:
Summary:
Gold is recovered from ore at Veladero using ROM and crushed ore cyanide heap leaching, and a Merrill-Crowe zinc cementation gold recovery plant. The lower gold grade ore, i.e., above the cut-off grades (COG) for ROM ore and below the COG for crushed ore, is mined and trucked to the Valley Leach Facility (VLF) and co-mingled with crushed ore (in the past, ROM ore was stacked in a separate area from crushed ore). Final delivery to the pad for ROM and crushed ore is by haul truck and spreading is by track-mounted dozer.
Ore that has a gold grade above the cut-off grade for crushed ore is trucked from the mine or stockpiles and crushed in one of two two-stage crushing circuits to a nominal size of 80% passing (P80) 40 mm.
The crushed ore is hauled by a fleet of 11 trucks from the crushing plant to the VLF, a distance of approximately 4.2 km.
The Valley Leach Facility (VLF)
A single VLF is located south of the Amable pit and South WRF. The final proposed VLF design is approximately five kilometres east to west by one kilometre north to south, with a footprint of approximately 270 ha. Elevations of the footprint range between 4,000 MASL and 4,300 MASL, with a maximum bench elevation of approximately 4,375 MASL. The maximum vertical height within the VLF is constrained to 150 m above the primary liner at nominal 13 m stack heights.
To date, the Phase 6 leach pad expansion was successfully commissioned in the second quarter of 2021, in line with guidance. The Phase 7 construction is under way.
At the VLF, ore is stacked as cells in 13 m lifts. Cells are typically 200 m to 250 m by 80 m to 100 m in size, or approximately 20,000 m2, and contain approximately 450,000 t to 500,000 t of ore. The maximum height of the leach pad is constrained to an overall stack height of 150 m above the primary liner, but is typically 100 m or less stack height.
Approximately 230,000 m2 to 260,000 m2 of surface area in the VLF is actively under leach at any given time with dilute cyanide leach solution applied using drip emitters. The drip emitters are buried approximately 60 cm to 65 cm to maximize distribution of solution and minimize freezing risk and evaporation. The nominal capacity of the Barren Solution pumping system is 2,900 m3/h. Pregnant solution is collected by the dam, at the toe of the leach pad, and pumped to the Merrill-Crowe recovery plant. An additional 0-2,700 m3/h is provided by a PLS Recycle system which provides an ability to control the Pregnant Solution Storage Area (PSSA) solution level and pursue solution enrichment with lower grade ore.
The pregnant solution is clarified in pressure leaf filters and stored in a clarified solution tank. From the tank, solution is pumped to a vacuum de-aeration tower which removes the dissolved oxygen from the precious metal bearing solution. Zinc dust is fed to the solution as it exits the de-aeration tower and the precious metals are removed from the solution as solid precipitate. Plate and frame filter presses are used to separate the precipitate from the solution. The barren solution is collected in a barren solution tank, cyanide and make-up water are added to the solution, and it is re-circulated to the VLF for reuse.
The zinc precipitate is collected from the filter presses and processed in retorts designed to recover mercury vapours from the precipitate as it is heated under vacuum. By-product mercury is collected and stored on site.
The dried precipitate is mixed with flux and smelted in electric induction furnaces. Gold doré that is produced by the refining process is shipped off site for further refining to produce fine gold and silver.
Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
Production:
Commodity | Units | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Gold
|
koz
| 440-480 ^ | 344 | 452 | 548 | 556 | 576 | 544 |
All production numbers are expressed as metal in doré.
^ Guidance / Forecast.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Total tonnes mined
| 75,574 kt | 58,216 kt | 73,516 kt | 71,292 kt | 64,501 kt | 62,227 kt |
Ore tonnes mined
| 21,258 kt | 27,356 kt | 32,096 kt | 31,436 kt | 28,774 kt | |
Waste
| 54,316 kt | 30,860 kt | 39,856 kt | 39,856 kt | 35,757 kt | |
Stripping / waste ratio
| 2.56 | 1.13 | 1.29 | 1.27 | 1.24 | |
Tonnes processed
| 22,228 kt | 24,034 kt | 27,174 kt | 27,094 kt | 28,253 kt | 28,028 kt |
Reserves at December 31, 2021:
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
20 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.41 g/t
|
0.26 M oz
|
Proven
|
20 Mt
|
Silver
|
12.41 g/t
|
7.8 M oz
|
Probable
|
160 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.82 g/t
|
4.2 M oz
|
Probable
|
160 Mt
|
Silver
|
14.78 g/t
|
76 M oz
|
Proven & Probable
|
180 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.77 g/t
|
4.4 M oz
|
Proven & Probable
|
180 Mt
|
Silver
|
14.52 g/t
|
84 M oz
|
Measured
|
22 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.39 g/t
|
0.28 M oz
|
Measured
|
22 Mt
|
Silver
|
11.35 g/t
|
8 M oz
|
Indicated
|
260 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.71 g/t
|
5.8 M oz
|
Indicated
|
260 Mt
|
Silver
|
14.19 g/t
|
116 M oz
|
Inferred
|
36 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.7 g/t
|
0.78 M oz
|
Inferred
|
36 Mt
|
Silver
|
13.8 g/t
|
16.2 M oz
|
Commodity Production Costs:
| Commodity | Units | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
Cash costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
654 / oz
|
636 / oz
|
Cash costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
629 / oz†
|
598 / oz†
|
Total cash costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
850 / oz
|
777 / oz
|
759 / oz
|
|
|
Total cash costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
770 / oz ^†
|
816 / oz†
|
748 / oz†
|
734 / oz†
|
|
|
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
1,527 / oz
|
1,337 / oz
|
1,130 / oz
|
1,179 / oz
|
1,025 / oz
|
All-in sustaining costs (AISC)
|
Gold
|
USD
|
1,310 / oz ^†
|
1,493 / oz†
|
1,308 / mtu†
|
1,105 / oz†
|
1,154 / oz†
|
987 / oz†
|
All-in costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
1,554 / oz
|
1,419 / oz
|
1,187 / oz
|
1,179 / oz
|
1,025 / oz
|
All-in costs
|
Gold
|
USD
|
|
1,520 / oz†
|
1,390 / oz†
|
1,162 / oz†
|
1,154 / oz†
|
987 / oz†
|
^ Guidance / Forecast.
† Net of By-Product.
Operating Costs:
| Units | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
OP mining costs ($/t mined)
|
USD
| 3.04 | 2.91 | 2.87 | 3.21 | 3.99 | 3.33 |
Processing costs ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 4.1 | 3.66 | 3.97 | 3.69 | 4.34 | 3.29 |
G&A ($/t milled)
|
USD
| 2.89 | 2.66 | 2.06 | | | |
Financials:
| Units | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2016 |
Sustaining costs
|
M USD
| 272 | 196 | 182 |
286
|
95
|
Capital expenditures
|
M USD
| 284 | 226 | 212 |
286
|
95
|
Revenue
|
M USD
| 764 | 666 | 772 |
732
|
685
|
Operating Income
|
M USD
| 236 | 228 | 114 |
106
|
|
EBITDA
|
M USD
| 406 | 366 | 344 |
348
|
338
|
HME Type | Model | Size | Quantity | Ref. Date |
Backhoe
|
Komatsu PC2000
|
|
1
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Backhoe
|
Caterpillar 345
|
|
1
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Backhoe
|
Caterpillar 385
|
|
1
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Dozer (crawler)
|
Caterpillar D10
|
|
6
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Drill
|
Sandvik Pantera 1500
|
|
1
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Drill
|
Atlas Copco FlexiROC D65
|
|
2
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Drill
|
DrillTech D90K
|
260 mm
|
5
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Drill
|
Ingersoll Rand DMM2
|
260 mm
|
2
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Drill
|
Epiroc PV271
|
260 mm
|
3
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Grader
|
Caterpillar 16H
|
|
5
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Loader
|
Komatsu WD854
|
|
3
|
Mar 1, 2020
|
Loader
|
Caterpillar 988
|
|
1
|
Mar 1, 2020
|
Loader (FEL)
|
Caterpillar 994
|
19 cu. m
|
4
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Shovel
|
Liebherr 996
|
36 cu. m
|
3
|
Mar 1, 2020
|
Shovel
|
Komatsu PC5500
|
29 cu. m
|
2
|
Mar 1, 2020
|
Truck (haul)
|
Caterpillar 793
|
|
52
|
Oct 15, 2022
|
Truck (haul)
|
Caterpillar 777
|
|
2
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Truck (water)
|
Caterpillar 777
|
|
4
|
Mar 23, 2018
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
Chief Operating Officer
|
Mark Hil
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Drilling & Blasting Manager
|
Brian Ivan Szlejcher
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
General Manager
|
Isaac Luciano
|
|
May 19, 2023
|
Health & Safety Superintendent
|
Fuad Omar Teme
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Manager Site General Services
|
Carlos Cabanillas
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Mine Operations Manager
|
Javier Eduardo Cristiani
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Mine Operations Superintendent
|
Octavio Bertero
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Operations Manager
|
Eduardo KU
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Operations Superintendent
|
Juan Emanuel Rodriguez
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Plant Maintenance Manager
|
Herman Bofinger
|
|
Aug 4, 2022
|
Staff:
Employees | Contractors | Total Workforce | Year |
|
|
4,192
|
2021
|
|
|
4,959
|
2019
|
|
|
3,476
|
2018
|
1,477
|
2,500
|
3,977
|
2017
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations: