Mining Intelligence and Sales Leads
Tunisia

Gasaat (Chaketma) Project

Click for more information

Categories

Summary

Mine TypeOpen Pit
Study CompletedPreliminary Economic Assessment
Study in ProgressPreliminary Economic Assessment Update
Commodities
  • Phosphate
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Mine Life... Lock
SnapshotGasaat is rapidly emerging as a globally significant phosphate project.

In December 2022, the Gasaat Scoping Study confirmed a long-life, high-margin project. Conceptual development is envisaged in two stages:
Stage 1 Rock Phosphate Mine
• Multi-decade mine life;
• Open pit mine, low strip ratio, simple wash/screen or flotation, favourable metallurgy.
Stage 2 Integrated Fertiliser Project
• Commence BFS on value-add phosphoric acid plant;
• Road, rail, power, oil and gas pipelines and port capacity infrastructure available.

In 2024, PhosCo announced that an application had been lodged for a new Exploration Permit in Tunisia’s Kasserine Region. The new application “Gassaat” encapsulates the former Chaketma Phosphate Project, including interpreted extensions of the deposit.

As of December, 2025, PhosCo is focused on areas of upside identified in the 2022 scoping study and is testing additional prospects that were outside the previous tenement.

Owners

SourceSource
CompanyInterestOwnership
PhosCo Ltd. 100 % Indirect
PhosCo Ltd. fully owns the Gasaat Project (100% interest).

Contractors

Lock

- subscription is required.

Deposit type

  • Sedimentary

Summary:

The Chaketma project consists of sedimentary sequence of shallow marine shelf carbonates, sandstones and deeper marine clays and marls, dating Cretaceous to Miocene. The dominant stratigraphic sequence (from top to bottom) comprises a massive dolomitic limestone of Lutetian age, followed by the Ypresian phosphate suite and then a gradational transition to Paleocene marls on the footwall.

The top of the phosphate suite is a phosphatic dolomite/dolomitic phosphatic sandstone, grading sharply down to a high grade medium-grained phosphatic sandstone. This massive phosphatic unit occupies a substantial portion of the total mineralised sequence and is continuous over the entire deposit. Grain size decreases and marly intercalations gradually increase towards the bottom of the sequence, before passing into thicker marls below.

The phosphate unit in the Chaketma project is composed often of a single layer with a vertical variation of grain size of ore mineral and lateral variation of the thickness. The thickness of phosphate unit varies from 1m to 50m, with an average thickness of between 10m to 15m.

The sedimentary series surrounding and enveloping the phosphate mineralization is made up of, from the base to the surface, marls and marine clays from the Cretaceous to Paleocene, deposited in deeper environments, gradually passing to a suite of Ypresian phosphate, which is then covered by a massive bed of dolomitic limestone Lutetians to Nummulites that can be up to 150m in thickness.

Structure
The Chaketma project was deposited within an extensional 'pull-apart basin' which contains evidence of rotational-block and strike-slip faulting, slumping and warping. The northern end of the prospect has been subjected to dramatic EW-trending normal faulting with significant vertical displacement and associated drag folding.
A major NNW-SSE-trending bounding fault runs the entire length of the western side of the KEL, GK, and SAB deposits. The existence of this fault is confirmed stratigraphically with the juxtaposition of Eocene strata against older Cretaceous marls to the west, although the location has been inferred by changes in topographic profile.
A gentle synclinal fold occupies the central third of the GK deposit. The northern limb of the mineralized horizon dips approximately 15° SSW towards the fold axis, while the southern limb dips 12° NNW into the axis of an anticline located further south. Along both fold hinges evidence of faulting exists, although data is currently lacking to fully define relative movement.

The southern portion of GK is characterised by hummocky terrain which may be indicative of local block faulting, although the mineralised horizon remains consistent over the available points of observation.
The eastern side of the deposit is also fault-bounded along its entire length, although the boundary consists of NNW-SSE oriented listric faults with large-scale block slumping and rotation. These staggered blocks eventually merge with the DOH prospect to the east.

The Chaketma phosphate deposit is situated in the southeast part of North Tunisia Phosphate Basin. This deposit consists of mainly seven blocks separated and dislocated by regional faults, six of which are contained within the Chaketma permit.

These blocks or prospects are known as:
• Kef El Louz (KEL);
• Gassa El Kebira (GK);
• Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine (SAB);
• Douar Ouled Hamouda (DOH);
• Kef El Aguab (KEA) and;
• Gassat Ezarbat (GE).

Reserves

Lock

- subscription is required.

Mining Methods

Lock

- subscription is required.

Heavy Mobile Equipment

Fleet data has not been reported.

Comminution

Crushers and Mills

Lock

- subscription is required.

Processing

Lock

- subscription is required.

Water usage

Parameter2022
Total water 5,500 m3/day

Commodity Production

CommodityProductUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Phosphate Concentrate kt 1,500 *67,600 *
P2O5 Mt 0 *
* According to 2022 study.

Operational metrics

Metrics
Annual processing capacity  ....  Subscribe
Stripping ratio  ....  Subscribe
Waste tonnes, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Tonnes processed, LOM  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2022 study.

Production Costs

CommodityUnitsAverage
Total cash costs Phosphate USD  ....  Subscribe
Assumed price Phosphate USD  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2022 study / presentation.

Operating Costs

CurrencyAverage
OP mining costs ($/t mined) USD  ....  Subscribe
OP mining costs ($/t milled) USD  ....  Subscribe
Total operating costs ($/t milled) USD  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2022 study.

Project Costs

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
OP OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Income Taxes $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Royalty payments $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Gross revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
EBITDA (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
$M USD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe

Personnel

Mine Management

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Jan 31, 2026
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Jan 31, 2026

Workforce

Aerial view:

Lock

- subscription is required.