Overview
Stage | Production |
Mine Type | Underground |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
- Bench stoping
- Transverse stoping
- Longitudinal retreat
- Cemented backfill
- Paste backfill
|
Production Start | 2022 |
Mine Life | 14 years (as of Jan 1, 2022) |
Aripuanã is one of the few new zinc mines recently constructed in the world. Ramp up activities started in mid-2022 and will continue in 2023. Nexa expects to reach full plant capacity in the second half of 2023. |
Source:
p. 30
Company | Interest | Ownership |
Nexa Resources S.A.
|
100 %
|
Indirect
|
Mineração Dardanelos Ltda.
(operator)
|
100 %
|
Direct
|
Nexa Recursos Minerais S.A., which is 100% owned by Nexa Resources S.A., holds directly and indirectly 100% of Mineração Dardanelos Ltda., which owns 100% of the Aripuanã project.
Contractors
Contractor | Contract | Description | Ref. Date | Expiry | Source |
SE Juina
|
Power supply
|
Electrical power will be provided by SE Juina (National Energy System) through private installations of UHE Dardanelos, where the connection to the Nexa bay will be at 230kV.
|
Feb 20, 2023
|
|
|
Source:
p.55-61
Summary:
The Aripuanã polymetallic deposits are typical volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits associated with felsic bimodal volcanism. Support for this model is based on the geometry of mineralization, host rocks, hydrothermal alteration, and sulphide paragenesis. The Aripuanã VMS deposits have been subsequently deformed and metamorphosed under greenschist facies conditions (Leyte, 2005 and Petrus, 2006, as cited in VMH, 2012c). Details observed at Aripuanã and consistent with VMS deposits are described below.
Host rocks: All mineralized bodies are located on the upper levels of a felsic volcanic unit, in association with finely laminated exhalites, at or close to the contact with an overlying sedimentary unit.
Mineralization zonality and predominant textures: Three types of mineralization are found at the Project, and are typical of VMS deposits elsewhere:
-Stringer facies: Cu-Au bearing stringers in the footwall of the stratabound mineralization, containing chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite, with stockwork and breccia textures corresponding to hydrothermal feeder zones.
-Proximal sulphide facies: mixed bodies of stratabound massive and disseminated Zn-Pb mineralization, overlying stringer mineralization.
-Geochemical zonality. The Cu/Cu+Zn ratio is higher in the proximity of the copper rich feeder zones and decreases upward from the footwall and towards the distal zinc rich stratabound mineralization.
Facies associated with the feeder zones are located in the middle of the volcanic unit and are characterized by pyrrhotite and/or chalcopyrite stockworks in a zone of intense chloritic hydrothermal alteration. The sulphide association represents a feeder zone at higher temperature.
Stratigraphy over the property consists of meta-sediments, meta-volcanic and metapyroclastic rocks, and hydrothermally altered rocks at the interface between the meta-sediments and meta-volcanics. The meta-sediments comprise meta-mudstones, metasiltstones, and carbonaceous meta-siltstone, while the meta-volcanics and meta-pyroclastics grade from rhyolite to dacite in composition. The hydrothermal zone occurs as stratabound when related to exhalative rocks or pipe like when related to the feeder zone. The stratabound portion of the hydrothermal zone has three main types of alteration, carbonate, tremolite, and sericitic. The feeder or stringer zone has three types of alteration, sericitic, phyllic (sericite + chlorite), and chloritic (+silicification). On surface, the hydrothermal alteration zone is strongly masked by tropical weathering, usually associated with gossans. Portions of the property have Phanerozoic alluvial cover.
Three main elongate mineralized zones, Arex, Link, Ambrex, and Babaçú, have been defined in the central portion of the Project. Limited exploration has identified additional, possible mineralized bodies including Massaranduba, Boroca, and Mocoto to the south and Arpa to the north.
Where outcropping, sulphide mineralization has been oxidized forming gossanous bodies which frequently mark the position of overthrust faults. These gossans are generally small and contain low levels of gold. They do not appear to be of economic interest at this time.
The individual mineralized bodies have complex shapes due to intense tectonic activity. Stratabound mineralized bodies tend to follow local folds, however, local-scale, tight isoclinal folds are frequently observed, usually with fold axes that are parallel to major reverse faults, causing rapid variations in dips. The Arex, Link, Ambrex, and Babaçú deposits are the best understood and are described below.
Hydrothermal alteration is commonly directly adjacent to the Arex, Link, Ambrex, and Babaçú deposits, and according to Leite et al. (2005, as cited in AMEC, 2007) presents a zonal and symmetrical standard:
-External zone: Sericite and muscovite in a fine-grained matrix with minor chlorite content. Where present, the low sulphide content is dominated by pyrrhotite.
-Intermediate zone: Transition of sericite to chlorite halo on stringer zones. Tremolite and chlorite alteration with minor carbonatization and silicification.
-Internal zone: Stringer zones are characterized by pervasive chlorite alteration accompanied by quartz veins. Sulphide content is dominated by chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite. Porphyroblastic magnetite and biotite locally substitutes within the sulphide matrix. The stratabound zones are dominated by tremolite, talc and carbonate alteration, accompanied by sphalerite, galena and pyrite, with minor magnetite and fluorite. The stratabound zone may be brecciated.
Mineralization at the Arex deposit strikes at approximately 110° azimuth, extending over a 1,400 m strike length. Upper portions of the deposit tend to be near-vertical, while lower portions dip at 60° to the northeast. The Arex deposit is characterized by well-defined stringer and stratabound zones. Discrete lenses of stratabound and stringer mineralization, ranging from less than one metre to 15 m thick, interplay within a 100 m to 150 m wide zone, separated by barren, hydrothermally altered rocks. Mineralization comes close to outcropping at surface and extends to almost 500 m below surface. Discrete lenses may be continuous for up to 300 m down dip. The Arex deformation pattern is made of tight, foliation-parallel folds, and reverse faults which overthrust in the same direction. The Arex deposit presents strong dip variations that are often parallel to foliation and faults. In some areas, this may cause the stratabound and stringer mineralization to be parallel, despite its original perpendicular position.
The Link deposit, first discovered in 2014, is interpreted to be the westward extension of the Ambrex deposit towards the Arex deposit. It is located approximately 300 m southeast of the Arex deposit and exhibits shape, mineralization, and alteration features similar to Ambrex, the largest deposit. Link mineralization strikes at approximately azimuth 125° and has a strike extent of approximately 450 m, based on current drilling. Mineralization thicknesses typically range between 10 m and 50 m, with a maximum of 150 m. Mineralization comes close to outcropping at surface and extends to almost 700 m below surface. The degree of folding at Link is gentler than at Arex and hosts well marked overthrust faults, which are parallel to metamorphic foliation. The orientation of the stratabound mineralization is generally parallel to the original bedding, while the stringer zone is often approximately perpendicular to the stratabound zone.
The Ambrex deposit represents the largest of the known mineralized zones on the Project. The Ambrex deposit is located approximately 1,300 m southeast of the Arex deposit. Ambrex mineralization strikes at approximately azimuth 125° and has a strike extent of approximately 1,050 m, based on current drilling. The dip varies from near vertical to 70° to the northeast. Mineralization thicknesses typically ranges between 10 m and 50 m, with a maximum of 150 m. The Ambrex deposit has an upper depth of 60 m below surface, with a lower depth of approximately 700 m. The degree of folding at Ambrex is gentler than at Arex and hosts well marked overthrust faults, which are parallel to metamorphic foliation. The orientation of the stratabound mineralization is generally parallel to the original bedding, while the stringer zone is often approximately perpendicular to the stratabound zone.
Mining Methods
- Bench stoping
- Transverse stoping
- Longitudinal retreat
- Cemented backfill
- Paste backfill
Source:
p.195-201
Summary:
The mine design has been based on using modern mobile trackless equipment with independent decline accesses into the Arex, Link, and Ambrex deposits.
The three deposits will be accessed from three independent surface cut and cover portals and ramps designed at a gradient of 14% to be driven with an arched profile and cross-sectional area (CSA) of 27 m2 to accommodate the selected major equipment. The main loading and hauling equipment will be 12.5 t class load haul dump units (LHD) combined with 35.5 t class haul trucks.
Main mining sublevels will be spaced 75 m apart, with stope sublevels placed at 25 m spacing. The upper sublevel in each level will contain a five metre sill pillar. The two mining methods will be longitudinal retreat longhole mining, and vertical retreat mining (VRM) with primary and secondary sequencing. Backfilling of stopes will be completed using pastefill, cemented rockfill, and rockfill.
Material movement at Aripuanã will be completed via ramps using haulage trucks. Primary development consists of ramps and raises. Secondary development consists of cross cuts, level access, footwall drives, ore drives, and all infrastructure development (sumps, remucks, etc.).
A nominal production target of 6,065 tpd (2.2 Mtpa) has been used as the basis for the Aripuanã production schedule.
Nexa has undertaken a number of mining method option studies, which have selected a combination of longitudinal longhole retreat stoping (bench stoping) for narrow zones and VRM for thicker zones of the deposits. To increase the extraction ratio, a primary and secondary stoping sequence will be used in the VRM areas with cemented pastefill used to backfill stopes. Finished longhole retreat stopes will be backfilled with rockfill.
The primary mining method selected for the Arex deposit is longitudinal retreat mining. The majority of the Link and Ambrex deposits will be mined using VRM, with longitudinal longhole retreat mining utilized in minor areas. The tonnage split between VRM and bench stoping is approximately 60:40.
An estimate of the potentially mineable tonnage has been generated based upon the estimated Mineral Resources. The estimate includes both Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. DSO was used to generate stope shapes to a minimum dip of 50°. A Minimum Mining Width (MMW) of four metres has been applied. No hanging wall or footwall dilution was added in the DSO analysis, however, it was accounted for in the mine scheduling.
Source:

- subscription is required.
Processing
- Flotation
- Dewatering
- Filter press
Flow Sheet:
Source:
Summary:
The Aripuanã process flowsheet has been developed through metallurgical test work and the use of conventional technologies for the treatment and recovery of copper, lead, and zinc as separate concentrates. Plant throughput is planned to be 2.214 Mtpa of run of mine (ROM) ore from the Arex, Link, and Ambrex underground mines. Two main ore types are present at Aripuanã, stratabound and stringer, that have different hardnesses and therefore different throughput rates. Stratabound material, however, will make up the majority of the ore to be processed (approximately 89%) and the feed blend to the plant is expected to peak at 21% stringer material during Year 5. Estimated processing rates for the two ore types individually based on hardness are approximately 5,000 tpd (dry basis) for stringer material and 6,300 tpd (dry basis) for stratabound material. Throughput for the blended ore is estimated as a weighted average of the throughputs of the two ore types. Key elements of the process flowsheet include primary crushing, a SAG mill followed by a ball milling and pebble crushing (SABC) circuit, talc pre-flotation, and sequential flotation of copper, lead, and zinc for stratabound mineralization, and copper flotation for stringer mineralization.
Flotation will be conducted sequentially, i.e., the production from the comminution circuit will pass through four independent circuits in sequence. The first flotation circuit is for talc and light mineral flotation (mainly minerals containing magnesium) to remove naturally hydrophobic minerals and prevent them from contaminating the sulphide concentrates or interfering with sulphide flotation. Due to the high content of light minerals in stratabound mineralization, these minerals must be removed prior to sulphide flotation, however, since stringer mineralization contains only minor amounts of these minerals, processing of stringer ore only would generally by-pass the talc flotation step as the minor talc content can be depressed with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The flotation circuits for the recovery of copper, lead, and zinc follow talc flotation.
Hydrocyclone overflow slurry will be conditioned prior to being fed to the talc flotation circuit, which consists of three column flotation stages: rougher, cleaner, and reverse copper flotation. Reagents added to the conditioning tank for talc flotation include MIBC as a frother and SMBS as a depressant of iron sulphides (pyrite and pyrrhotite). The talc rougher concentrate will be cleaned in the second column, with the cleaned concentrate reporting to the reverse copper flotation column where talc will be depressed with CMC while copper in the talc concentrate is recovered and reports to downstream sulphide flotation. The final talc concentrate will be combined with the sulphide flotation tailings for disposal. The talc flotation tailings containing copper, lead, and zinc minerals (including copper recovered from the talc concentrate during reverse copper flotation), will proceed to the copper flotation circuit.
Prior to conditioning and cleaner flotation, copper rougher flotation concentrate will be reground in a vertical stirred mill to P80 45 µm to increase sulphide liberation and promote cleaner stage recovery. Two stages of cleaning in column cells will produce the final copper concentrate. Copper rougher-scavenger concentrate will be recycled to the rougher flotation feed, while copper rougher-scavenger flotation tailings will feed the lead flotation circuit (stratabound or blended ore). If processing stringer ore, however, the rougher-scavenger flotation tailings can be pumped directly to tailings dewatering . Cleaner circuit tailings are recycled to the copper rougher feed.
Prior to lead rougher flotation, the feed slurry will be conditioned with the aforementioned reagents in two tanks in series. The lead circuit consists of rougher flotation, rougher concentrate regrinding to P80 75 µm, rougher-scavenger flotation, and two-stage cleaner flotation. The product from the lead cleaner flotation circuit will be the final lead concentrate. The lead rougher-scavenger flotation tailings will be pumped to feed the zinc flotation circuit.
The zinc flotation circuit is similar to the copper and lead flotation circuits, however, the quantity of flotation cells and some of the reagents used are different. Lead rougher-scavenger flotation tailings will be thickened prior to being pumped to the zinc flotation circuit. The reagents used for zinc flotation include:
-AERO 208 or A208 (dialkyl dithiophosphate collector for zinc)
-Copper sulphate (sphalerite activator)
-Lime (pH regulator)
-MIBC (frother)
Prior to zinc rougher flotation, the feed slurry will be conditioned with the aforementioned reagents in two tanks in series. The zinc circuit consists of rougher flotation, rougher concentrate regrinding to P80 75 µm, rougher-scavenger flotation, and two-stage cleaner flotation. The product from the zinc cleaner flotation circuit will be the final zinc concentrate. Zinc rougher-scavenger flotation tailings will be pumped to tailings dewatering for disposal.
THICKENING AND FILTRATION
Thickening and filtration will be performed on flotation concentrates and tailings. Three concentrates (copper, lead, and zinc) will be produced, with each thickened and filtered separately. Tailings generated from flotation will consist of talc concentrate and sulphide flotation tailings, which are also thickened separately, then combined and filtered.
The copper, lead, and zinc concentrate slurries will be pumped to storage tanks feeding pressure filters dedicated to each concentrate, which will reduce the moisture to approximately 10%. The filtered copper and zinc concentrates will fall by gravity onto belt conveyors that will deliver the material to segregated covered storage areas. These concentrates will be reclaimed by front end loader and loaded into trucks for shipping. Lead concentrate will be bagged in lined supersacs and loaded into containers for shipping. All filtrates will be recovered for re-use in their respective flotation circuits. Excess filtrate and concentrate thickener overflow will be discharged to an engineered wetland treatment system and can then be recycled to the processing plant as make-up water as required or discharged.
Sulphide flotation tailings will be thickened and filtered in three pressure filters and combined with filtered talc concentrate prior to disposal. The sulphide flotation tailings thickener underflow will be filtered to produce a filter cake with approximately 10% moisture that is suitable for dry stacking in two stockpiles (capacity of approximately 5,200 t each). This stockpiled material will be recovered by front end loader and loaded into trucks for transport to the dry stack tailings dump or the paste backfill plant. Filtrates from the pressure filters will be pumped to a recovered water pond and reclaimed for return to the process.
Production:
As of July 2022, started ramp-up activities at the Aripuanã mine.
Commodity | Product | Units | 2023 | 2022 | Avg. Annual (Projected) | LOM (Projected) |
Zinc
|
Metal in concentrate
|
kt
| 28-40 ^ | 1 | 73 | 766 |
Copper
|
Metal in concentrate
|
kt
| 6.3-7.8 ^ | 0.2 | 3.6 | 42 |
Silver
|
Metal in concentrate
|
koz
| 800-1,200 ^ | | 1,850 | 19,477 |
Lead
|
Metal in concentrate
|
kt
| 8.9-13 ^ | | 25 | 265 |
Zinc Equivalent
|
Metal in concentrate
|
M lbs
| | 3.2 | 269 | |
Zinc
|
Payable metal
|
kt
| | | | 713 |
Zinc
|
Concentrate
|
kt
| | | | 1,380 |
Copper
|
Payable metal
|
kt
| | | | 41 |
Copper
|
Concentrate
|
kt
| | | | 142 |
Silver
|
Payable metal
|
koz
| | | | 16,654 |
Lead
|
Payable metal
|
kt
| | | | 251 |
Lead
|
Concentrate
|
kt
| | | | 461 |
Gold
|
Payable metal
|
koz
| | | | 131 |
Gold
|
Metal in concentrate
|
koz
| | | 14 | 159 |
Reserves at December 31, 2022:
Mineral Reserves are estimated at a NSR break-even cut-off value of US$48.11/t processed. Some incremental material with values between US$38.05/t and US$48.11/t was included. Mineral Reserves are estimated using average long-term metal prices of Zn: US$2,826.35/t (US$1.28/lb), Pb: US$2,043.95/t (US$0.90/lb); Cu: US$7,398.47/t (US$3.36/lb); Au: US$1,474.88/oz; and Ag: US$19.93/oz.
The Mineral Resources estimate is reported on a 100% ownership basis. Mineral Resources are reported using a cut-of value of US$48.11/t. Forecast long term metal prices used for the NSR calculation are: Zn: US$3,250.31/t (US$1.47/lb), Pb: US$2,350.54/t (US$1.07/lb); Cu: US$8,508.24/t (US$3.86/lb); Au: US$1,696.11/oz; and Ag: US$22.92/oz.
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven & Probable
|
30.12 Mt
|
Zinc
|
3.42 %
|
1,029 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
30.12 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.17 %
|
50.4 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
30.12 Mt
|
Silver
|
32.1 g/t
|
31,026 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
30.12 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.25 %
|
377.7 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
30.12 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.23 g/t
|
220 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
2.95 Mt
|
Zinc
|
2.21 %
|
65.1 kt
|
Measured & Indicated
|
2.95 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.22 %
|
6.4 kt
|
Measured & Indicated
|
2.95 Mt
|
Silver
|
21.5 g/t
|
2,039 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
2.95 Mt
|
Lead
|
0.8 %
|
23.7 kt
|
Measured & Indicated
|
2.95 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.32 g/t
|
30.5 koz
|
Inferred
|
38.55 Mt
|
Zinc
|
2.41 %
|
929.1 kt
|
Inferred
|
38.55 Mt
|
Copper
|
0.3 %
|
115.7 kt
|
Inferred
|
38.55 Mt
|
Silver
|
29.5 g/t
|
36,563 koz
|
Inferred
|
38.55 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.02 %
|
393.2 kt
|
Inferred
|
38.55 Mt
|
Gold
|
0.46 g/t
|
570.1 koz
|
Financials:
| Units | 2023 |
Capital expenditures (planned)
|
M USD
| 53.5 |
Source:

- subscription is required.
Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of November 17, 2020:
Source:
p.202
HME Type | Model | Size | Quantity |
Cable bolter
|
|
|
1
|
Drill (long hole)
|
|
|
5
|
Jumbo
|
|
|
5
|
Load-Haul-Dump (LHD)
|
Caterpillar R1700
|
|
3
|
Load-Haul-Dump (LHD)
|
Caterpillar R2900
|
|
3
|
Rock bolter
|
|
|
4
|
Scaler
|
|
|
4
|
Truck (underground)
|
|
30 t
|
7
|
Truck (underground)
|
|
45 t
|
10
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
Consultant - Mining & Costs
|
Jason Cox
|
|
Nov 17, 2020
|
Consultant - Recovery Methods
|
Brenna J.Y. Scholey
|
|
Nov 17, 2020
|
General Manager
|
Rodrigo Fonseca
|
|
May 25, 2023
|
Processing Manager
|
Juliana Siqueira
|
|
May 25, 2023
|
Technical Services Manager
|
Vitor Ferraz Viana
|
|
May 29, 2023
|
Staff:
Corporate Filings & Presentations: