• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
United States
Horseshoe Project (Haile Operation)

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
5,5 km NE from Kershaw, South Carolina, United States

  Project Contacts:
6911 Snowy Owl Road
P.O. Box 128
Kershaw
South Carolina, United States
29067
Phone  ...  Subscription required
EmailEmail
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in United States
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StagePermitting
Mine TypeUnderground
Commodities
  • Gold
Mining Method
  • Open stoping
  • Cemented backfill
Processing
  • Flotation
  • Concentrate leach
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Carbon in leach (CIL)
  • Elution
  • Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
  • Cyanide (reagent)
Mine Life5 years (as of Jan 1, 2017)
Latest NewsOceanaGold Reports High-grade Intercepts at Haile     September 12, 2019


Owners

Source: p. 18
CompanyInterestOwnership
OceanaGold Corp. 100 % Indirect
Haile Gold Mine Inc. 100 % Direct
OceanaGold Corp. indirectly owns 100% interest in the Haile UG project through it's wholly owned subsidiary Haile Gold Mine Inc.

Deposit Type

  • Sediment-hosted
  • Intrusion related


Summary:

Haile gold mineralization occurs as an en echelon 5 km long by 1.5 km wide cluster of moderately to steeply-dipping ore lenses within a ENE-trending anticlinorium. Eleven named gold deposits are recognized at Haile. From west to east these include Champion, 601, Small, Mill Zone, Haile, Ledbetter, Mustang, Red Hill, Palomino, Snake and Horseshoe. Ore body geometry, depth, size, grade, mineralogy and alteration are variable between deposits. Ore zone geometry is strongly controlled by post-mineral folding and position within the Haile anticlinorium. Some of the deposits coalesce, especially in the central part of the district around the large Ledbetter deposit. Ore lenses are typically 50 to 300 m long, 20 to 100 m wide, and 5 to 30 m thick.

Gold mineralization at Haile is mostly hosted by folded laminated siltstone and greywacke of the upper Persimmon Fork Formation and is capped by less permeable volcanic rocks. Mineralization is typically within 100 meters of the sediment-volcanic contact. Mineralized zones at Ledbetter, Red Hill and Snake are partly hosted in volcanic rocks.

Gold mineralization at Haile is disseminated and occurs in silicified and pyrite-rich metasediments with local K feldspar and molybdenite. Mineral zonation is a quartz-sericite-pyrite+-K feldspar+- gold (QSP), sericite +- pyrrhotite propylitic (chlorite-calcite-epidote) haloes. QSP mineralized zones are tens of meters wide. Sericite envelopes range in thickness from tens to hundreds of meters and are controlled by protolith, structural permeability and post-mineral folding. Within the mineralized zones, quartz is dominant (60% to 80%), pyrite is moderate (1% to10%), and sericite is variable at 5% to 20%. Two silicification events are observed in the mineralized zones. Early massive silicification is finely disseminated to diffuse. Later silicification is manifested as matrix fill in tectonic and hydrothermal breccias and as stock work veinlets. Sericite alteration is commonly expressed as sericite schists due to sericite replacement of micaceous layers in metasediments, imparting a tannish white color. Bleaching and/or argillisation is weakly developed within and adjacent to sericite zones. Propylitic alteration is characterized by increased chlorite (5% to 20%) and a mottled texture with blebs of 3 to 5 mm calcite aggregates. Late calcite +- quartz veining is focused along fault zones.

High-grade zones >3 g/t Au are characterized by intense silicification, anastomosing quartz veins, hydrothermal breccias and >1% fine-grained pyrite. Pyrite grain size is typically <20 microns and occurs as stringers, lenses and banded layers, including graded beds and reworked sulfide sediment. High grade zones are focused where ENE faults coincide with anticline axes in folded metasediments adjacent to the overlying metavolcanic rocks. The Horseshoe deposit averages over 4 g/t and occurs within a tight anticline dissected by ENE-trending, NW-dipping faults.

Oxidation at Haile extends to depths of 20 to 60 meters and is deepest along faults and in folded volcanic rocks. Hematite and goethite are strongest near surface, accompanied by saprolite, and decreased at depth to weak joint stains.

Gold spatially correlates with molybdenite, silver, arsenic, antimony, molybdenum, and tellurium at Haile (Mobley et al., 2014). Arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite are rarely associated with gold mineralization.


Mining Methods

  • Open stoping
  • Cemented backfill


Summary:

The Horseshoe underground mine production schedule is based on the productivity assumptions. The schedule was completed using iGantt scheduling software and is based on mining operations occurring 365 days/year, 7 days/week, with two 12-hr shifts each day. A production rate of 1,924 t/d was targeted with ramp-up to full production as quickly as possible.

Stopes will be mined using the sublevel open stoping method. Individual stope blocks are designed to be 15 m wide, up to 30m long, and will have a transverse orientation. Levels are spaced 25 m apart and each stope block will have a top and bottom access (5 m x 5 m flat back drifts).

Stopes will be drilled downward from the top access using 114 mm diameter holes (stope slots will be drilled with a DTH drill and stope production rings will be drilled with a tophammer drill). A bottom up, primary/secondary extraction sequence will be followed. Primary stopes will be backfilled with CRF(Cemented rock fill) and secondary stopes will be backfilled with RoM waste from the underground and open pit operations.

Stope extraction will occur in two steps. During the first step, a slot will be mined at the far end the stope using a drop raise and 28 fan-drilled slash holes. The slot is required to create sufficient void space for the remainder of the stope to be blasted. During the second step, production rings will be blasted three rows at a time (13 blast holes per ring) until the stope is completely extracted. The number of three-row blasts in a given stope will depend on the length of the stope. All blasting will be performed with bulk emulsion.

Ore will be remotely mucked from the bottom stope access using a 14-t LHD (6.2m3 ). Cable bolts will be installed at the stope brow to ensure stability. The LHD will transport the ore to a muck bay to maximize the efficiency of the stope mucking operations. A second 14-t LHD and a fleet of 40-t haul trucks will be used to transport ore from the muck bays to the surface. Multiple muck bays will be used on each level to avoid interference between the stope loader and the haul trucks. At the surface, the haul trucks will dump onto a RoM ore stockpile and will then travel to an adjacently located backfill plant to be loaded with CRF. After being loaded, the haul trucks will return to the underground mine and will dump the CRF into a muck bay near the top of an empty primary stope. After dumping the load of CRF at the muck bay, the haul truck will return to the producing level to once again be loaded with ore. A 7-t LHD will be used to transport the CRF from the muck bay to a dumping point at the top access of the empty stope.

A mine access and material handling tradeoff study was completed for the Horseshoe deposit. Options considered included shaft access with ore hoisting, decline access with conveyor haulage, and decline access with truck haulage. The tradeoff study demonstrated that, given the deposit depth, production rate, and anticipated mine life, the economically superior option is decline access with truck haulage.

The upper portion of the 5.0 m wide by 5.5 m high access decline is expected to be in weathered rock and therefore will require an increased level of ground support. After the decline has passed through the weathered rock, a less intensive level of ground support will be required. The decline is designed at a maximum gradient of 14%. A turning radius of 25 m was used, which is suitable for the underground haul trucks contemplated for the operation.

The portal for the access decline will be located on an open pit bench approximately 80 m below the natural surface, thereby eliminating the need to develop the access decline through saprolite. The portal construction will consist of scaling and bolting/screening and application of shotcrete as necessary to support and create a safe surface above the mine portal. A structurally sound corrugated pipe style liner with supports as necessary will be constructed for the first 200 feet of portal or as dictated by the rock conditions. Ventilation, power, water discharge, supply water, and communications will be installed at the portal and carried down the decline to support the development operation. An all weather gravel surface will be established at the portal and portal bench area and drainage will be maintained away from the portal entrance to minimize water entering the portal and decline from the bench area.

Secondary egress will be via 5.0 m diameter raisebored ventilation raises equipped with emergency hoisting.

The mine will utilize CRF in the primary stopes and either rock fill or low strength CRF in the secondary stopes. CRF will be generated in a surface plant located at the underground storage yard that includes a 160 t/hr portable crushing/screen plant that will create two specification grade aggregate piles and an oversize pile. The specification grade aggregate will be transported to the CRF plant by a front-end loader where it will be loaded into one of two hoppers, a large aggregate (4 inch to 3/16 inch) and fine aggregate (3/16 inch minus), that will in turn batch feed into a mixer that combines specified quantities of cement, water, and aggregate to create the required high strength CRF. A conveyor moves the CRF mixture to a bin that stores the CRF for loading of the underground trucks. The CRF plant has a capacity of 100 m3 /hr with a batch mixer, cement silo with screw conveyor and weigh hopper, water weigh hopper, and the aforementioned two loss-in-weight aggregate bins. The 40-t underground haul truck pulls under the bin after dumping its ore on the stockpile and loads the CRF. Once loaded, the truck hauls the CRF underground to an open stope where backfilling is taking place. The truck dumps the load either directly into the stope or in a staging area where an LHD hauls the CRF to the stope for placement.


Crushing and Grinding


Processing

  • Flotation
  • Concentrate leach
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Carbon in leach (CIL)
  • Elution
  • Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
  • Cyanide (reagent)

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The processing methods will remain the same as the currently operating plant for the proposed expansion. A conventional flotation and cyanide leaching flow sheet will continue to be used at Haile.

The existing Haile facilities have an ample site footprint to expand to a capacity of 4.0 Mtpa.

RoM ore will continue to be fed from the existing tip bin using the installed apron feeder and will pass over the existing vibrating grizzly where fines will be scalped out and oversize material will feed the existing primary (jaw) crusher operating in open circuit exactly as per the current arrangement.

The primary crushed ore stream will be able to diverted by a modified chute from the head of the first extant crusher area conveyor onto a new conveyor and delivered via a scalping screen into a secondary crusher operating in open circuit. Screen undersize and secondary crushed ore will be combined and conveyed back to the existing coarse ore bin and stockpile arran ........


Projected Production:

CommodityUnitsAvg. Annual
Gold oz 90,000

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Daily mining rate 1,924 t *
Waste tonnes, LOM 584,022 t *
Ore tonnes mined, LOM 3,116,039 t *
Total tonnes mined, LOM 3,700,061 t *
* According to 2017 study.

Reserves at December 31, 2018:

CategoryTonnage CommodityGradeContained Metal
Probable 3.1 Mt Gold 4.38 g/t 0.44 M oz
Indicated 2.7 Mt Gold 5.68 g/t 0.49 M oz
Inferred 1.2 Mt Gold 5 g/t 0.2 M oz

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnitsAverage
Assumed price Gold USD 1,300 / oz *
* According to 2017 study / presentation.

Operating Costs:

Units2017
UG mining costs ($/t mined) USD 39.1 *
Processing costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2017 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2017 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Total CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
UG OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of January 31, 2017:
HME TypeSizeQuantity
Cable bolter 120 kW 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 5
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Apr 15, 2020
Subscription required - Subscription is required.


Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2021
................................... Subscription required 2019
................................... Subscription required 2019
Annual Information Form 2018
Year-end Mineral Reserves 2018
Feasibility Study Report 2017
Press Release 2016
Feasibility Study Report 2015
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

News:

NewsDate
OceanaGold Reports High-grade Intercepts at Haile September 12, 2019

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2020 MDO Data Online Inc.