• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
Mexico
Pitarrilla Project

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
157 km N from Durango, Durango, Mexico

  Project Contacts:
Paseo del Mil Diez #202 Fracc. Lomas del Sahuatoba
Durango
Durango, Mexico
CP 34108
Phone  ...  Subscription required
Fax52-618-130-2989
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in Mexico
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StageFeasibility
Mine TypeOpen Pit
Commodities
  • Silver
  • Zinc
  • Lead
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Processing
  • Flotation
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Counter current decantation (CCD)
  • Merrill–Crowe
  • Cyanide (reagent)
Mine Life32 years (as of Jan 1, 2012)


Owners

Source: p. 50
CompanyInterestOwnership
SSR Mining Inc. 100 % Indirect
SSR Durango, S.A. de C.V. 100 % Direct
The Pitarrilla project is held by SSR Durango, S.A. de C.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary of SSR Mining Inc.

Deposit Type

  • Epithermal


Summary:

The Property is centrally located within the Central Mexican Silver Belt, which is defined by numerous Ag-Pb-Zn (±Au-±Cu) deposits that are classified as intermediate sulphidation epithermal deposits (Hedenquist et al., 2000). This includes the world class silver ore systems at Fresnillo, Zacatecas, and Guanajuato. These Mexican polymetallic silver deposits consist mainly of vein systems that occupy faults and major fractures affecting Mesozoic sedimentary and marine volcanic rocks and to a lesser degree unconformably overlying Tertiary volcaniclastics and pyroclastics.

Superficially, the Pitarrilla Ag-Pb-Zn mineralisation does not display features generally considered to be characteristic of intermediate sulphidation epithermal deposits, especially considering the occurrences of near surface oxide silver mineralisation. However, when the different forms of sulphide mineralisation found in the Lower Andesite Sill, Basal Conglomerate, and Basement Zones of the Pitarrilla deposit are examined, it is evident that these bodies of sulphide silver mineralisation, do in fact, share mineralogical features with the major polymetallic vein deposits in Mexico and elsewhere in the world. Specifically, the sulphide mineral suite of pyrite/marcasite-sphalerite-galena chalcopyrite-pyrrhotitearsenopyrite tetrahedrite (-freiburgite), that is found in all of the hypogene mineral zones at Pitarrilla, is fairly diagnostic of the intermediate sulphidation subclass of epithermal deposits (Hedenquist et al., 2000). The fact that the mineral resources and reserves at Pitarrilla are not defined on major veins, except perhaps for the C Zone within the Lower Andesite Sill, does not necessarily preclude the Pitarrilla deposit from being classified as an intermediate sulphidation type of epithermal deposit, since there are analogies of the Pitarrilla mineralised zones in a number of deposits within the Central Mexican Silver Belt. For example, the AgPb-Zn ore that was mined at the Real de Angeles open pit mine in Zacatecas State (Pearson et al., 1988) is quite similar, in terms of host rock and styles of mineralisation, to the mineralisation forming the resource domains (subzones) defined in the Basement Zone at Pitarrilla. As well, the replacement style sulphide mineralisation of the Basal Conglomerate (D) Zone is presumed to be comparable to the manto mineralisation that was historically mined at Fresnillo (Ruvalcaba-Ruiz and Thompson, 1988). Furthermore, while recognizing that hydrothermal phases such as quartz, calcite, barite, and fluorite, which form gangue minerals in most Mexican epithermal veins, are only minor to accessory components in the sulphide ores at Pitarrilla, it should be noted that unmineralised calcite, barite, and fluorite veins do exist on the Property, even proximal to zones of silver mineralisation. Thus, while not representing a “classic” example of an intermediate sulphidation epithermal mineral system, the zones of sulphide mineralisation at Pitarrilla do have a mineralogical signature that is consistent with these zones belonging to this subclass of epithermal deposit. Moreover, the overall geological setting at Pitarrilla and the perceived genetic association of the Ag-Pb Zn mineralisation with middle Tertiary felsic magmatism are again consistent with the deposit being classified as an intermediate sulphidation epithermal deposit.

Ag-Zn-Pb mineralisation at Pitarrilla occurs as a vertically stacked mineralised system centered on rhyolitic dykes and sills that constitute the feeder system for an early Oligocene volcanic centre manifest by a rhyolitic dome. Mineralisation is interpreted to have occurred during or shortly after emplacement of this dome. Ag-Zn-Pb mineralisation is rooted in the basement Cretaceous sediments where it is represented by an aerially restricted but vertically extensive zone of disseminated and veinlet Ag-Zn-Pb (-Cu As-Sb) sulphide-associated mineralisation. Overlying the Cretaceous basement, strata-bound massive replacement mineralisation occurs within a polymictic conglomerate at the Cretaceous-Eocene unconformity. The hypogene (fresh) or sulphide-associated mineralisation extends into the overlying Eocene to Oligocene, volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks as well as felsic and intermediate sills, where it grades into partly weathered, or transitional mineralisation, and a more laterally extensive zone of disseminated highly weathered, or oxide-associated, mineralisation.

Sulphide-associated mineralisation at Pitarilla was weathered under near surface oxidising conditions, resulting in the destruction of primary sulphide and sulphosalt minerals and liberation of ions into the weathering environment where they re-precipitated as secondary mineral phases. The destruction of pyrite resulted in the release of iron and sulphuric acid. The released iron was re precipitated as iron oxide species including limonite and goethite. Argentiferous galena was broken down as a result of weathering and silver was liberated to re-form in minerals such as acanthite and silver halides (chlorargyrite, iodargyrite, bromargyrite; LeCouteur, 2006) which deposited along with the iron (and manganese) oxides thus producing oxide-associated mineralisation.

Typically, the oxide-associated mineralisation is accompanied by pervasive argillization of the originally feldspathic intrusive and volcanic host rocks. The felsic intrusive rocks and near surface dacitic volcaniclastics that make up the bulk of the mineralised rocks in the zones of oxide-associated silver mineralisation show evidence of moderate to strong acid-leaching and consequent mass reduction. Acid-leaching is inferred to have affected these rocks on the basis of their highly depleted levels of calcium, sodium, and magnesium as well as their highly porous and commonly ‘vuggy’ textures. The leaching is believed to have resulted from the acidification of weakly acidic oxidised meteoric waters as the weathering of pyrite resulted in the production of sulphuric acid.

Weathering of the host rocks and mineralisation was gradational, in places remnant sulphide species remained surrounded by minerals precipitated as a result of the oxidation process. Mixed oxide and sulphide mineral species form a material type that is called transitional mineralisation.

In summary, for metallurgical treatment purposes three main silver bearing material types are recognised at the Pitarrilla Ag-Pb-Zn deposit, these are called Oxide, Transitional, and Sulphide mineralisation.

The total extent of the oxide-associated mineralisation is considerable, about 1.9 km in the NNW-SSE direction and 2.9 km in the NE-SW direction. The six zones of oxide-associated mineralisation are, in chronological order of discovery, Cordon Colorado, Peña Dyke, Javelina Creek, Breccia Ridge, South Ridge and South Ridge East.


Mining Methods

  • Truck & Shovel / Loader


Summary:

The Pitarrilla Project will use standard truck and shovel open-pit mining methods. The expected mining life is 20 years, including three pre-production years. The pit will be mined in five phases, starting with Breccia Ridge and Cordon Colorado. Over the life of the Pitarrilla Project, a fleet of trucks is expected to haul approximately 1.1 billion tonnes of material and 157 million tonnes of ore, at a strip ratio of 5.96:1. After mining is completed, the plant will continue to mill ore from stockpiles for an additional 12 years.

The potential to mine Mineral Resources located below the open pit was not evaluated in the Pitarrilla Feasibility Study (M3, 2012), but may be evaluated later in the Pitarrilla Project’s life.

The Pitarrilla Feasibility Study (M3, 2012) calls for the mining of 157 Mt of silver ore and 933 Mt of waste via open cut mining methods from a single, large, semi-conical pit. The total waste tonnes include additional waste for potentially acid generating (“PAG”) neutralizing material to be sourced outside the main pit. The ore and some of the waste is planned to be mined on 7.5m high benches and where there are suitable areas without ore, these are planned to be mined on 15m high benches (47% of tonnage).

The mine excavation is planned to be completed in 20 years (including three pre-production years), leaving 12 years of processing the low grade stockpiles. A total of approximately 60 Mt of low grade ore is planned to be stockpiled and processed after pit mining ceases.

The waste dumps are planned to surround the pit and completed in a formation that are amenable to rehabilitation to 3H:1V (horizontal: vertical) slopes. Some control of PAG rock may be required through the mining of carbonate rich rocks from the Manto Rico formation and mixing this within the waste, as it is produced.


Crushing and Grinding


Processing

  • Flotation
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Counter current decantation (CCD)
  • Merrill–Crowe
  • Cyanide (reagent)

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The Pitarrilla Project will consist of an open pit mine, ore processing facility, and miscellaneous infrastructure and support facilities.

After crushing and milling, one of two processing types will be applied to the ore:
• Highly-oxidised ore will be direct leached and then silver will be extracted via the Merrill-Crowe process to produce doré. For the purposes of this report, this ore will be referred to as either “oxide” ore or “direct leach” ore.
• Less-oxidised ore (transitional) through to un-weathered sulphide ore will be processed by sequential flotation to extract lead and zinc minerals into separate lead and zinc mineral concentrates. The tailings from these flotation processes will then proceed to the cyanide leach circuit to produce doré. For the purposes of this report, this ore will be referred to as either “sulphide” ore or “flotation/leach” ore.

The design basis for the ore processing facility is 16,000 tpd of sulphide ore (equivalent to ........

Recoveries & Grades:

CommodityParameterAvg. LOM
Silver Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Silver Head Grade, g/t 95.1
Zinc Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Zinc Head Grade, % 0.79
Zinc Concentrate Grade, %  ......  Subscription required
Lead Recovery Rate, %  ......  Subscription required
Lead Head Grade, % 0.29
Lead Concentrate Grade, %  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Projected Production:

CommodityProductUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Silver Payable metal koz 10,102312,150
Zinc Payable metal M lbs  ......  Subscription required  ......  Subscription required
Zinc Concentrate kt  ......  Subscription required  ......  Subscription required
Lead Payable metal M lbs  ......  Subscription required  ......  Subscription required
Lead Concentrate kt  ......  Subscription required  ......  Subscription required

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Stripping / waste ratio 5.96 *
Daily mining rate 200 kt *
Waste tonnes, LOM 933,685 kt *
Ore tonnes mined, LOM 156,590 kt *
Total tonnes mined, LOM 1,090,275 kt *
Plant annual capacity 5,840 kt *
Daily processing capacity 16,000 t *
Tonnes processed, LOM 156,590 kt *
* According to 2012 study.

Reserves at December 31, 2018:

CategoryOreTypeTonnage CommodityGradeContained Metal
Measured In-Situ (OP) 12.35 Mt Silver 90 g/t 35.7 M oz
Measured In-Situ (OP) 12.35 Mt Zinc 1.22 %
Measured In-Situ (OP) 12.35 Mt Lead 0.7 %
Indicated In-Situ (OP) 147.02 Mt Silver 97 g/t 460.7 M oz
Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Silver 165 g/t 28.8 M oz
Indicated In-Situ (OP) 147.02 Mt Zinc 0.87 %
Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Zinc 1.34 %
Indicated In-Situ (OP) 147.02 Mt Lead 0.32 %
Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Lead 0.68 %
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (OP) 159.36 Mt Silver 97 g/t 496.5 M oz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Silver 165 g/t 28.8 M oz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (OP) 159.36 Mt Zinc 0.89 %
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Zinc 1.34 %
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (OP) 159.36 Mt Lead 0.35 %
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (UG) 5.43 Mt Lead 0.68 %
Inferred In-Situ (OP) 8.52 Mt Silver 77 g/t 21.2 M oz
Inferred In-Situ (UG) 1.23 Mt Silver 138 g/t 5.5 M oz
Inferred In-Situ (OP) 8.52 Mt Zinc 0.58 %
Inferred In-Situ (UG) 1.23 Mt Zinc 1.25 %
Inferred In-Situ (OP) 8.52 Mt Lead 0.18 %
Inferred In-Situ (UG) 1.23 Mt Lead 0.89 %

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnits2020
Credits (by-product) Silver USD -5.46 / oz *
Cash costs Silver USD 11.6 / oz *
Total cash costs Silver USD 10 / oz *†
Assumed price Lead USD 0.9 / lb *
Assumed price Zinc USD 0.95 / lb *
Assumed price Silver USD 25 / oz *
* According to 2012 study / presentation.
† Net of By-Product.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Operating Costs:

Units2020
OP mining costs ($/t mined) USD 1.44 *
OP mining costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
Processing costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
Total operating costs ($/t milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2012 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2012 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Sustaining CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Closure costs $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Total CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
OP OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Processing OpEx $M USD 2,420
G&A costs $M USD 282.1
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Income Taxes $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Net revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Net Income (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of December 14, 2012:
HME TypeModelSizeQuantity
ANFO Loader 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 9
....................... Subscription required 13
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 3
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 4
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 1
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 27
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 5
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required 2
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Feb 1, 2021
Subscription required - Subscription is required.


Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2019
................................... Subscription required 2018
Annual Information Form 2017
Corporate Presentation 2017
Corporate Presentation 2017
Annual Information Form 2016
Corporate Presentation 2016
Feasibility Study Report 2012
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2020 MDO Data Online Inc.