Overview
Stage | Production |
Mine Type | Underground |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
- Drift & Fill
- Cemented backfill
|
Processing |
|
Mine Life | 2024 |
Atico Mining Corporation announced in its press release dated July 22, 2021, that it is currently in the process of renewing the title on its claims hosting the El Roble property, which under the current agreement are set to expire in January 2022. This process is still ongoing. The Company is working diligently with the authorities and believes it has followed and fulfilled all of the renewal requirements. However, at this time, the title has not been renewed and there is no assurance that it will be renewed. If the new title is not granted on or before January 23, 2022, the Company will be forced to halt mining operations. That outcome would be materially adverse for the Company since it will have no cash flow from operations and will be required to change its priorities. The Company will continue to firmly pursue the renewal of the title and will advise the market of any developments as they occur. |
Latest News | Atico Reports Consolidated Financial Results for 2021 April 26, 2022 |
Source:
p. 3
Company | Interest | Ownership |
Atico Mining Corp.
|
90 %
|
Indirect
|
Minera El Roble S.A.
(operator)
|
100 %
|
Direct
|
On November 22, 2013, the Atico Mining Corp. completed the exercise of its mineral property purchase option, acquiring 90% of the shares of Minera El Roble S.A., the owner of the El Roble mineral property and took control of the producing El Roble mine and 6,355 hectares of surrounding claims.
Summary:
The El Roble massive sulfide mineralization is classified as the ‘mafic-type volcanogenic massive sulphide type’.
Atico geologists and other workers use four major rock classifications to described the geology of El Roble license areas. The lowest unit is a submarine mafic volcanic unit up to several kilometers thick. Whole rock (NaO, K2O, MgO, FeO) analyses reported by Ortiz et al. (1990) place the basalt flows in the tholeiitic field. The mafic volcanic unit is overlain by a “black chert unit” up to 30 m thick and turn these grades upwards into a pelagic sedimentary unit, locally termed the “grey chert” up to 120 m thick. The entire package is topped by a sandstone-mudstone, turbidite unit several kilometers thick. The massive sulfide deposits are hosted in the black chert and grey chert units always occurring within meters of the uppermost mafic volcanic contact. The succession of basalt flows, black to grey chert and overlying pelagic sedimentary rocks and sandstone-shale turbidites sequence has been intruded by andesite and latite dikes which post date and disrupt the massive sulfide mineralization.
Mineralization
The El Roble deposit consists a series of massive sulfide lenses, separated by faulting and are the dismembered fragments of once coherent, single, massive sulphide body. The mineral deposit that comprises the El Roble Project consists of mafic-type volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) mineralization for which there are numerous examples in the world. The host rocks for the VMS mineralization present on the MINER El Roble mineral concessions consist of basalt flows, black to grey chert and overlying deep-water sedimentary rocks, and sandstone. The deposition of the VMS mineralization is syngenetic with the black chert, which generally forms both the hanging wall and footwall “host” to the mineralization. The portion of the El Roble deposit currently being mined by MINER has been overturned by folding such that it now dips steeply to the east. Based on the drill hole data provided by MINER as of the effective date of this amended Technical Report, the dimensions of the deposit currently are 325 meters along strike by ±600 meters deep and up to 45 meters in thickness. Continuity of the mineralization is locally disrupted by Tertiary andesite and latite dikes up to 10 meters in width that intrude both the VMS mineralization and the host rocks. Strands of one of the major regional northwest-striking faults have resulted in conjugate N-S, E-W NW-SE faults offset the mineralization particularly below the 2100 level of the mine.
The massive sulphide mineralisation is fine-grained, with only locally evident internal structure or banding, consisting predominantly of fine-grained pyrite and chalcopyrite. Pyrite occurs as euhedral and subhedral grains that vary from 0.04 to 0.01 millimeters in diameter. Colloform pyrite textures and crushed pyrite grains are also common. Chalcopyrite typically fills spaces between pyrite grains, along with minor pyrrhotite and sphalerite; no other sulphide minerals have been identified. Gold occurs as electrum in 10- to 100-micron irregular grains in the spaces between pyrite grains. Minor silver is also present, presumably as a component of the electrum. Gangue minerals include quartz and chlorite along with lesser calcite, dolomite and minor hematite and magnetite.
Mining Methods
- Drift & Fill
- Cemented backfill
Summary:
The El Roble Mine consists of an underground mine with surface infrastructure. Access is by paved primary and secondary highways from Medellin, Antioquia. The mine produces ores that are processed at the local process plant, concentratres are shipped to Buenaventura, Colombia on the Pacific coast for storage and eventual shipping to overseas smelters.
The workings are all underground. The principal mine adit is located within a kilometer of the process plant at the nominal 1,850 Level (1,850-m MASL). The 1880 Level serves as a ventilation intake as well as access for all personnel and materials; additionally, it is the main haulage access to transport ore and waste to the surface. A secondary access is located at the 2000 Level (2,000-m MASL), this access is the primary ventilation exhaust for the mine.
Ore is hauled from underground in highway dump trucks and dumped to covered surface stockpiles, the stockpiles are sampled and the material blended to meet the plant feed grade needs.
Mining Method
Various stoping methods have been used at El Roble successfully. Early in the mine's life blasthole open stoping was done successfully. Large, stable voids were excavated in the massive sulfides with no backfill palced immediately after mining. This method was used from abpve the 2200 Level to the 2000 Level. As large voids were not filled, eventually massive wall failures resulted in collapsed stopes and accesses.
Atico elected to develop a new main access at the 1880 Level to address the newly discovered, deeper deposits. The adit was started in August 2013 and intersected the first deposit in January 2014. Since that time mining has been continuously performed from the 1880 Level, with a declining ramp and raises developed to address the deposit below the 1880 Level horizon.
The drift-and-fill mining method is used in the Zeus deposit. Exploitation of the Maximus and Goliat deposits has been estimated using the sublevel caving mining method. Positive results on up to two occasions have made it possible to consider estimating the mineral contribution of these two deposits in the life of mine – LOM plan.
The Zeus drift-and-fill mining is addressing a large, amorphous volume of massive sulphide material which contains payable metals (Cu and Au).
Mining in the Zeus Deposit
Zeus is the deepest deposit to be mined at El Roble, approximately 450 meters below the mountain surface topography. Zeus is accessed via a main ramp (nominal section 4.5 m x 4.5 m) departing from the 1880 Level at a decline of nominally 12 percent. All equipment access, haulage, fresh air intake and services are placed in the ramp. There are several Alimak raises that connect the ramp at various elevations to the upper workings on the 2000 Level; these raises serve as exhaust raises to remove spent air from the workings and deliver it to the surface through an adit and workings on the 2000 Level.
Zeus Stope Access
The Zeus deposit is accessed at vertical intervals ranging from 45 to 60 meters, using cross-cuts and sub-ramps from the main ramp. These cross-cuts and sub-ramps have a nominal section of 4m X 4m and wide radii of curvature to accommodate large equipment. The main ramp was situated approximately 40-60 meters from the Zeus deposit while the ramp was located in black chert. Basalt was found in the footwall of the deposit and the ramp transitioned to the basalt as it is much more stable than the black chert and requires much less ground support. The ramp in basalt remains a nominal 40 meters from the Zeus contact.
Cross-cuts and sub-ramps are driven with mechanized equipment following normal mechanized development cycles of drilling, blasting, scaling, mucking, mapping (geology and/or geotechnical), installation of ground support and then repeated. Ramps and cross-cuts have a nominal 4.5m x 4.5m cross-section with a graded road bed. Since there is little water present in the mine there is no significant ditch but this does not affect the quality of the road bed surface. Headings are ventilated with ventilation fans taking fresh air from the main ramp and forcing the air into the heading to be ventilated with standard plasticized canvas, flexible ventilation tubing. Vent tube diameter depends upon the active heading and associated equipment fleet; diameters range from 30 inches to 36 inches.
Cross-cuts and sub-ramps are driven from the main ramp to access the Zeus deposit as per the mine design. The deposit is amorphous; the accesses may be located at any reasonable access point depending upon the design needs. The sub-ramps and cross-cuts are designed to swing or pivot, providing one access point from the main ramp for each nest of sub-ramps or combination of cross-cut and sub-ramps. The sub-ramp or cross-cut intersects the deposit at the required elevation, stope development and stoping commence. When the lift is completed and the primary stopes have been backfilled the back of the access is brought down as required to provide access to the next lift upward. The broken rock from the back provides the fill for the roadway, extra swell is hauled to the surface as waste. Once the contact has been reached the normal stope development and mining plan resumes.
As the stope access nears the contact a cut-out is slashed and excavated. The cut-out becomes the access for an ore pass system on that level. The orepass system consists of vertical raises with nominal 3-m x 3-m dimensions, either driven conventionally or using longhole raising techniques. At the bottom of the ore pass system chutes have been installed for loading ore from the ore pas into haul trucks and delivered to the surface stockpiles.
Zeus Stoping
The Zeus deposit has been divided into various blocks, each block separated by a five-meter thick horizontal pillar that covers the entire deposit. The first access to a stope block is from the ramp and accesses the lowest stoping elevation within the stope block. Where deposit geometry and the ramp position permit, the access is driven down the approximate longitudinal axis of the deposit, running from contact to contact. If the ramp and deposit geometry do not permit the longitudinal access a cross-cut along a stope block centerline is developed from the sub-ramp or cross-cut access. This cross-cut is driven until it intersects the theoretical centerline of the longitudinal axis of the deposit. At this point a stope drift is turned perpendicular right and left of the cross-cut to develop the stope access drift along the longitudinal axis of the deposit.
Backfill
El Roble has a technical area responsible for executing the backfill process that guarantees the quality of the backfill in the mining workings. El Roble uses a detrital backfill cemented with tailings at forty per cent; all stope backfill at El Roble is cemented rock fill, with the exception of final fills in some lifts where the central stope access drift is filled with uncemented rock fill. Cemented rock fill is produced on surface and delivered underground in underground cement mixer trucks. The use of uncemented rock fill is limited to areas where no further work adjacent to, under or (in some cases) over the uncemented rock fill is planned. This percentage of the backfill is not large compared to the cemented rock fill.
Flow Sheet:
Crusher / Mill Type | Model | Size | Power | Quantity |
Jaw crusher
|
.......................
|
20" x 30"
|
60 HP
|
1
|
Cone crusher
|
|
4.25'
|
150 HP
|
1
|
Cone crusher
|
|
3'
|
100 HP
|
1
|
SAG mill
|
|
8' x 6'
|
|
1
|
Ball mill
|
.......................
|
2.1m x 2.1m
|
250 HP
|
1
|
Ball mill
|
.......................
|
2.7m x 2.7m
|
308 HP
|
1
|
Summary:
Crushing
Run-of-Mine (ROM) material is passed through a grizzly to a coarse ore bin, bar spacing on the grizzly is fixed to pass minus 10-inch material. The material in the coarse ore bin reports to an Otsuka 20-inch x 30-inch, 60-HP, single-toggle type jaw crusher via a 3-foot x 10-foot apron feeder. After jaw crushing the material reports to a conveyor system and then a two deck (3/4-inch and %-inch screen openings respectively), 5-foot by 12-foot vibrating screen.
The oversize from the vibrating screen reports to a 3-foot diameter, 100-HP cone crusher, this crushed material joins the middling product and reports to a single-deck vibrating screen (1/4-inch openings), the undersize reports to the fine ore bin and the oversize reports to a 4.25-foot diameter, 150-HP short head cone crusher. Crushed material from the secondary and tertiary crushers (cone crusher and short-head conce crusher respectively) reports back through the screen system for resizing and eventually reports to the fine ore bin.
Grinding
Material from the fine ore bin reports by apron feeder to a derrick screen where the material is wetted and screened using a 2.5-millimeter by 2.0-millimeter aperture high frequency vibrating screen. The undersize material reports to the ball mill discharge pulp, screen oversize reports to an Otsuka 2.1-meter by 2.1-meter, 250-HP ball mill. Ball mill discharge reports to the pulp slurry line without further classification. The pulp is then piped by gravity down a steep gradient with an approximate vertical drop of 150-meters to the main process plant.
The ground material reports to the 2.7-meter by 2.7-meter, 308-HP Otsuka ball mill discharge sump, from the sump the amterial is pumped to an SK-240-type flotation cell. The flotation overflow reports to the concentrate thickener, underflow reports to a cyclone nest where the material is classified, with the cyclone overflow reporting to flotation and the cyclone underflow reporting to the second ball mill for further size reduction. The ball mill discharge reports to the same ball mill sump where the pulp from the first stage of milling reports.
Minera El Roble S.A. is in the process of installing a SAG mill at the site to replace the present first stage ball mill. The existing circuit will be kept and maintained on a stand-by basis. No change in recovery or other process results is expected, the metallurgical results in the process plant expected to remain the same. No adjustments in the plant performance used to estimate the mineral reserve has been made to recognize the change in the first stage of milling.
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The processing methods consist of conventional crushing, grinding, and flotation to produce a copper-gold concentrate. Grinding is to 80 percent passing 200 mesh before reporting to flotation cells. Four banks of six flotation cells each generate concentrates which are subsequently thickened, filtered and stored on site for shipping via highway truck to the Pacific coast port of Buenaventura. Process tailings are deposited in an impoundment facility situated along the banks of the Rio Atrato located downstream of the processing plant. Process waste water is decanted in a tailings dam and then released (at a pH between 7.48 to 8.45) into the Rio Atrato.
Flotation
The flotation circuit begins with one OK-20-style flotation cell fed by the secondary ball mill cyclone overflow. The OK-30-style cell overflow reports to the concentrate thickener, the underflow reports to a bank of two, OK-8-style flotation cells. The flotation overflow from these cells reports to the concentr ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Copper
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 93.6 | 94.3 | 94.2 | 94 |
Copper
|
Head Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 3.71 | 3.87 | 3.71 | 3.26 |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 60.3 | 63.2 | 65.9 | 69.1 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 2.05 | 2.1 | 2.18 | 2.78 |
Copper
|
Concentrate Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 22.1 | 21.8 | 20.5 | 18.8 |
Gold
|
Concentrate Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 7.8 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 11.8 |
Silver
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 47.7 | 52.5 | 60.6 | 58.9 |
Silver
|
Head Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 9.7 | 9.42 | 8.02 | 10.9 |
Silver
|
Concentrate Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 29.5 | 29.3 | 28.7 | 38.5 |
Production:
Commodity | Product | Units | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Copper
|
Metal in concentrate
|
M lbs
| ...... ^ | ......  | ......  | 22 | 21 | 19 | 12 |
Copper
|
Concentrate
|
kt
| ...... ^ | ......  | ......  | 45 | 43 | 41 | 29 |
Gold
|
Metal in concentrate
|
oz
| ...... ^ | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  |
Copper
|
Payable metal
|
M lbs
| | ......  | ......  | 21 | 20 | 18 | 11 |
Silver
|
Metal in concentrate
|
oz
| | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  | ......  |
^ Guidance / Forecast.
- Subscription is required.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Ore tonnes mined
| ......  | 231,746 t | 278,504 t | 269,034 t | 244,717 t | 179,995 t |
Tonnes milled
| ......  | 236,354 t | 285,551 t | 256,078 t | 242,717 t | 178,095 t |
Daily milling rate
| ......  | 859 t | 827 t | 790 t | 788 t | 638 t |
Daily processing capacity
| ......  | 850 t | 850 t | 800 t | 800 t | 800 t |
- Subscription is required.
Reserves at September 30, 2020:
Mineral Reserves are reported using an NSR breakeven cut-off value of US$104.44/t (cost basis October 2019 to September 2020) for the Zeus body.
Mineral Resources are reported based on an NSR cut-off grade of US$54.39/t (cost basis October 2019 through September 2020).
Metal prices used were US$1,543.13/troy ounce Au and US$ 3.01/t Cu.
Reserves are based on break-even cut-off grade of 1.80 percent copper equivalent, which is based on actual El Roble operating costs from October 2019 – September 2020 along with other factors
Mineral Resources are reported to 0.89% CuEq cut-off.
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Recoverable Metal |
Proven & Probable
|
1,002 kt
|
Copper
|
3.02 %
|
66,678 k lbs
|
Proven & Probable
|
1,002 kt
|
Gold
|
1.76 g/t
|
57 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
1,002 kt
|
Copper Equivalent
|
3.81 %
|
|
Measured & Indicated
|
1,174 kt
|
Copper
|
3.26 %
|
84,343 k lbs
|
Measured & Indicated
|
1,174 kt
|
Gold
|
2.33 g/t
|
87.9 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
1,174 kt
|
Copper Equivalent
|
4.3 %
|
|
Inferred
|
17.1 kt
|
Copper
|
0.49 %
|
186.4 k lbs
|
Inferred
|
17.1 kt
|
Gold
|
3.41 g/t
|
1.9 koz
|
Inferred
|
17.1 kt
|
Copper Equivalent
|
2.03 %
|
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
News:
- Subscription is required.