.
Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
Location: 76 km SE from Kenora, Ontario, Canada
595 Burrard StVancouverBritish Columbia, CanadaV6C 0E4
Stay on top of the latest gold discoveries. Examine the latest updates on drilling outcomes spanning various commodities.
Mining scale, mining and mill throughput capaciites.Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Shaft depth, mining scale, backfill type and mill throughput data.Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Equipment type, model, size and quantity.Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Camp size, mine location and contacts.Full profiles of select mines and projects.
The Transaction was completed by way of a three-cornered amalgamation under the statutory provisions of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). The Company incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary, 1001416725 Ontario Ltd. ("FinCo"), which amalgamated with SubCo, to form 1001529863 Ontario Ltd. ("Amalco"). SubCo was the owner of the Cameron Project and a wholly owned subsidiary of First Mining Gold Corp. ("FMGC"). Amalco is now the entity that owns the Cameron Project and is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
- subscription is required.
Deposit typesThe following summary of deposit types is based on the work of Ball (2014). The QP has reviewed the geological data, including drill core observations from the 2025 site visit, and concurs with this deposit model classification. The identification of the Cameron deposit as an orogenic lode gold system with atypical characteristics (such as stockwork-disseminated sulphide zones) forms the basis of the current Mineral Resource estimation domains and provides a robust framework for the exploration strategies.The Cameron deposit is part of a group of orogenic gold mineral systems that occur within Archean greenstones. These have traditionally been classified as orogenic related hydrothermal processes (Robert et al., 2007). There are 19 identified deposits greenstone-hosted gold deposits with more than 10 Moz of contained gold and approximately 400 Moz of total worldwide endowment.Mineralization modellingChalice provided interpretations of the mineralization domains based on the updated assays from the resampling program of 2015. A nominal 0.4–0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade was used to digitize two-dimensional (2D) sectional outlines that were then wireframed into 3D solid objects.Snowden Optiro reviewed the interpretations against the geological models and information such as underground mapping and reports on mineralization controls. The comparison showed that the global approach to the interpretations was valid and the Main mineralization domains are reasonably consistent in terms of interval selection, thickness and volume control and assignment of continuity. Differences were noted in the hangingwall domains, extents of projection and some areas were found to have had the mineralized domains projected through unmineralized drillhole intersections.The final mineralization domains were interpreted by manually selecting spatially consistent 3D domains and using the codings to construct vein models in Leapfrog. These could be dynamically updated during the validation phase to include or exclude intersections based on their relationship to other domains, local geometry, support from adjacent intersections and continuity of structures. This process is time consuming but was considered necessary to constrain the samples within geologically consistent domains rather than running simplistic interpolant grade shells.• Main Zone: The most consistent and thickest of the mineralized domains. The Main Zone is split by the PQF dykes, into two estimation domains (south and north). The hangingwall PQF dyke moves in and out of the Main Zone but in general is located on the eastern (hangingwall) side. • Hangingwall Zone: A parallel zone to the Main Zone of narrow shear hosted mineralization averaging ~1–3 m thick approximately 10 m above the Main Zone. • Mid Zone: A distinct zone of lower-grade mineralization located between the Main and footwall zones and only found in the southern half of the deposit. This zone is subparallel to the Main and footwall zones. The Mid Zone ranges from 1 m to 20 m thick and averages 3–4 m. • Footwall Zone: The Footwall Zone is also continuous for the length of the deposit, and like the Main Zone is split at around 50475 mN by the northwest-southeast trending PQF dykes. • Footwall 2 Zone: A second footwall zone developed below the 525 mRL level in the southern end of the deposit. There are a number of thicker intersections in the deepest drillholes. To maintain consistency in thickness of the interpretations, this mineralization was interpreted as a separate zone. There is a clear separation between Footwall 2 Zone and Footwall Zone.
Success!