Overview
Stage | Preliminary Economic Assessment |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
Processing |
- Heap leach
- Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
- Carbon in column (CIC)
- Carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery (ADR)
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
- Cyanide (reagent)
|
Mine Life | 12 years (as of Jan 1, 2014) |
The Santa Gertrudis property was the site of an historic heap leach operation that produced approximately 565,000 ounces of gold at a grade of 2.1 g/t gold from 1991 to 2000. Substantial surface infrastructure is already in place on the property including pre-stripped pits, haul roads, water sources and buildings. |
Source:
p. 17
On November 1, 2017, Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Animas Resources Ltd., a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of GoGold Resources Inc. by way of a subscription and share purchase agreement (the ‘‘Animas Agreement’’) dated September 5, 2017. On the closing of the transactions relating to the Animas Agreement, Animas owned a 100% interest in the Santa Gertrudis exploration project located in Sonora, Mexico, indirectly, through three wholly-owned Mexican subsidiaries Recursos Escondidos, S.A. de C.V., First Silver Reserve, S.A. de C.V. and Coanzamex Santa Gertrudis, S.A. de C.V.
Summary:
Historic production for the Santa Teresa mining district was principally from sedimentary-rockhosted gold deposits that have been characterized by some authorities as “Carlin-type” in character. As noted in Section 7.0, although there are several features similar to Carlin-type gold systems, there are also many differences.
Field mapping and rock-chip geochemical sampling by Animas personnel within the Santa Teresa mining district confirms the presence of gold mineralization along north east striking (~045°), steeply west-dipping, normal and oblique slip faults. Gold mineralization appears to occur primarily within the hanging wall portions of the fault zones and these faults are believed to be the primary “feeder” structures for the known gold mineralization. Where the northeast-trending faults intersect northwest-trending, reactivated, bedding parallel thrust faults (~345°) and deformation zones, gold mineralization tends to bleed out along these more permeable zones. Tensional, conjugate sets of north-south and east-west trending faults also control the localization of gold mineralization, but these zones generally are less well mineralized than the northeast- and northwest-trending set of faults.
Mineralization appears to occur preferentially in rocks that were both structurally prepared and had chemical properties that allowed for gold deposition. Calcareous siltstone and limestone in La Gloria, Greta, and Santiago show strong local dissolution and jasperoid replacement is present throughout the district on a small and large scale. This pattern of intersection of faults in preferred host rocks is repeated throughout the district and has been the model used to explore the district since the early Phelps Dodge days. Based on this apparent fact, any larger deposits to be found at depth or under alluvial cover probably will likewise be associated with favourable structural intersections and chemically reactive calcareous host rocks.
Gold mineralization within the Santa Teresa mining district is most common in areas of structural ground preparation and less so as replacement deposits in calcareous units. Favourable ground preparation produced by a combination of high-angle, bedding-plane, and near bedding-plane faults and fractures resulted in the formation of zones that can have considerable lateral and presumed down-dip extent. This type of mineralization is most characteristic at El Toro, El Corral, Mirador, Escondida, Becerros Norte, Manueles Sur, Maribel, and Camello. Mineralized zones are generally 10 to 30 metres thick, and locally extend outward to a limited extent as replacement of the calcareous units. The most favourable structural settings for gold mineralization clearly are where north-east and north-west-trending fault zones intersect.
Summary:
The Santa Gertrudis property contains numerous gold deposits, some of which were partially mined in the past. The deposits are near surface and lend themselves to conventional open pit mining methods. The entire project area is about 10 km long in both the north-south and east-west directions.
For the PEA production plan, 27 different open pits will be developed over the life of the project to support a heap leaching operation. Some heap leach feed material will also be mined from a historical heap leach pad that retains recoverable gold.
Based on preliminary pit optimizations, and the application of dilution and losses factors, potential mine production and heap leach feed tonnages were estimated for each deposit. The total quantity of material that would be sent to the leach pad is calculated to be 29.5 Mt containing 916 k oz of gold. The overall waste to potential heap leach feed ratio is 5.5:1.
Flow Sheet:
Processing
- Heap leach
- Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
- Carbon in column (CIC)
- Carbon adsorption-desorption-recovery (ADR)
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
- Cyanide (reagent)
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The process design is based on the use of conventional heap leach technology with a process rate of 2.7 million t/a or 7,500 t/d.
Potential heap leach feed will be crushed in two stages and conveyed by a series of conveyors and a radial stacker capable of accessing the entire pad area. This material will be stacked in 6 m or 8 m high lifts and irrigated with dilute cyanide solution.
Pregnant solution will discharge the heap under gravity via embedded drainage piping and the contained gold will be adsorbed onto activated carbon in a five stage carbon-in-column (CIC) circuit. Gold will be eluted from the carbon periodically in a conventional batch pressure elution process, then electrowon and smelted to produce doré on site. Pregnant and barren solution ponds will provide surge for the process solutions and an emergency pond capable of holding anticipated maximum storm event water plus drawdown from the heap in the unlikely event of a concurrent temporary loss of po ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | Avg. LOM |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| 73.2 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| 0.97 |
Projected Production:
Commodity | Units | Avg. Annual | LOM |
Gold
|
oz
| 56,000 | 671,300 |
All production numbers are expressed as metal in doré.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | |
Stripping / waste ratio
| 5.5 * |
Daily ore mining rate
| 7,500 t * |
Annual mining capacity
| 2,700 kt of ore * |
Waste tonnes, LOM
| 163,187 kt * |
Ore tonnes mined, LOM
| 29,511 kt * |
Total tonnes mined, LOM
| 192,698 kt * |
Daily processing rate
| 7,500 t * |
Annual processing rate
| 2,700 kt * |
* According to 2014 study.
Reserves at December 31, 2020:
Category | OreType | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Measured & Indicated
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
5,778 kt
|
Gold
|
0.6 g/t
|
111 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
Total
|
5,778 kt
|
Gold
|
0.6 g/t
|
111 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
5,778 kt
|
Silver
|
4.39 g/t
|
816 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
Total
|
5,778 kt
|
Silver
|
4.39 g/t
|
816 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
19,691 kt
|
Gold
|
1.18 g/t
|
746 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (UG)
|
7,980 kt
|
Gold
|
3.43 g/t
|
879 koz
|
Inferred
|
Total
|
27,671 kt
|
Gold
|
1.83 g/t
|
1,625 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
19,691 kt
|
Silver
|
1.9 g/t
|
1,200 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (UG)
|
7,980 kt
|
Silver
|
25.39 g/t
|
6,515 koz
|
Inferred
|
Total
|
27,671 kt
|
Silver
|
8.67 g/t
|
7,715 koz
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Ref. Date |
.......................
|
.......................
|
Feb 1, 2021
|
- Subscription is required.
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
- Subscription is required.