Mining Intelligence and News
Canada

Fire Lake North Project

Click for more information

Categories

Overview

Mine TypeOpen Pit
StagePre-Feasibility
Commodities
  • Iron Ore
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Mine Life... Lock
SnapshotThe consolidated Fire Lake North project (CFLN) includes three deposits, the Fire Lake North, Bellechasse and Oil Can deposits.

With the completion of the Pre-Feasibility Study and the exploration phase of CFLN in 2013, the Champion significantly curtailed exploration and development expenditures at CFLN.

The negotiation of any impact and benefits agreements (IBA) may significantly delay the development of the properties. There are no assurances that the Champion Iron will be successful in reaching an IBA or other agreement with First Nation groups asserting Aboriginal rights or Aboriginal title or who may have a claim in connection with the Consolidated Fire Lake North project.

Owners

SourceSource
CompanyInterestOwnership
Champion Iron Ltd. 100 % Indirect
Champion Iron Ltd. fully owns the Fire Lake North project through Champion Iron Mines Limited (CIML), which holds 100% of the shares.

Contractors

Lock

- subscription is required.

Deposit type

  • Iron formation hosted

Summary:

The Properties’ deposits are classified as Lake Superior-type. Such iron formations are the principal sources of iron throughout the world. Iron formation deposits in the FIOD include ArcelorMittal’s Mont-Wright and Fire Lake Mines, Mont Reed iron deposits and Cliffs Natural Resources Bloom Lake Mine, (formerly owned by Consolidated Thompson Iron Mines Ltd.) and the Lamêlée Lake and Peppler Lake iron deposits.

Iron formations are classified as chemical sedimentary rock containing greater than 15% iron consisting of iron-rich beds, usually interlayered on a centimetre scale with chert, quartz, or carbonate. Ore is mainly composed of magnetite and hematite, and commonly associated with mature sedimentary rocks.

Stratiform iron formations are distributed throughout the world in the major tectonic belts of the Precambrian shields, and in many Paleozoic and Mesozoic fold belts, as well as parts of the present day ocean floor. Gross (2009) noted that the enormous size of some of the Archean and Paleoproterozoic iron formations reflected the unique global tectonic features and depositional environments for iron formation that were distinctive of the time.

Although various models have been used to explain the deposition of iron formations in the past, current thinking (summarized in Cannon, 1992, Gross, 1996, Gross, 2009) supports the idea of iron formation deposition, resulting from the syngenetic precipitation of iron-rich minerals in a marine setting due to hydrothermal exhalative activity on the ocean floor. The iron is thought to have formed in stable tectonic-sedimentary environments where silica, iron, ferrous and non ferrous metals were available in abundance, mainly from hydrothermal sources, and where conditions were favourable for their rapid deposition with minimal clastic sediment input.

Hydrothermal processes related to volcanism and major tectonic features are thought to be the principal source of iron and other metals. Deep fractures and crustal dislocations over hot spots and high thermal gradients penetrating the upper mantle enabled convective circulation, alteration and leaching of metals from the upper crust, including possible contributions by magmatic fluids. Iron formations are important hosts of enriched iron and manganese ore, gold deposits, and are also marker horizons for massive-sulphide deposits. Deposition of the iron was influenced by the pH and Eh of the ambient water, and biogenic anaerobic processes may have also played a role (Gross, 1996, Gross, 2009).

Post depositional events such as weathering, groundwater circulation and hydrothermal circulation can modify the deposits, and the mineralogy is usually recrystallized and coarsened by medium- to high-grade regional metamorphism. Protracted supergene alteration can be an important economic fact in upgrading the primary iron formation (Gross, 1996).

Iron formations can be subdivided into two (2) types, related to two (2) major types of tectonic environments: the Lake Superior-type on the continental shelf and marginal basins adjacent to deep-seated fault and fracture systems and subduction zones along craton borders; and the Algoma-type along volcanic arcs and rift systems and other major disruptions of the earth’s crust. Development of Lake Superior-types was related to global tectonic systems that caused the breakup of cratons, shields or plates in the Paleoproterozoic. Rapitan-type have distinctive lithological features being associated with diamictite, and were deposited in grabens and fault scarp basins along rifted margins of continents or ancient cratons in sequences of Late Proterozoic and Early Paleozoic rocks.

Reserves

Lock

- subscription is required.

Mining Methods

Lock

- subscription is required.

Comminution

Crushers and Mills

Lock

- subscription is required.

Processing

Lock

- subscription is required.

Production

CommodityUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Iron Ore kt 8,700182,400
All production numbers are expressed as concentrate.

Production Costs

CommodityUnitsAverage
Cash costs Iron Ore CAD 34.6 / t *  CAD
Assumed price Iron Ore CAD 111.34 / t *  CAD
* According to 2013 study / presentation.

Operating Costs

Currency2024
OP mining costs ($/t mined) CAD  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2013 study.

Project Costs

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Pre-Production capital costs $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Closure costs $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Total CapEx $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
OP OpEx $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Processing OpEx $M CAD 798.3
G&A costs $M CAD 738.1
Total OpEx $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Gross revenue (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 0% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 5% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 10% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax NPV @ 8% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 0% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 10% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 8% $M CAD  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
Pre-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscribe

Required Heavy Mobile Equipment

Lock

- subscription is required.

Personnel

Mine Management

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2024
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Dec 5, 2024

Total WorkforceYear
...... Subscription required 2013

Aerial view:

Lock

- subscription is required.