• Data Access
  • Your Email  
  • Your Email  
Keep me signed in.
Forgot your password?
Close
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Enter the email you signed up with and we'll email it to you.
  • Your Email  
Close
Back
MDO
Mining Data Solutions
  • Home
  • Database
  • Subscribe
  • Sign In
  • Sign In
United States
Grassy Mountain Project

This page is not tailored to
devices with screen width under 750 px.
 Location:
92 km W from Boise, Oregon, United States

  Project Contacts:
665 Anderson Street
Winnemucca
Nevada, United States
89445
Phone  ...  Subscription required
EmailEmail
WebsiteWeb
Additional Resources for Suppliers & Investors
Drill results over 30 g/t Au
Stay on top of recent discoveries.
Search drill results by commodity and grade.
Largest mines in the Americas
Mining and mill throughput capaciites.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Deepest underground mines
Shaft depth and mill throughput data.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Heavy mobile equipment
HME type, model, size and quantity.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Permitting and construction projects
Projects at the permitting or construction stage. Full profiles of select projects.
Mines with remote camps
Camp size, mine location and contacts.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
Mines & projects in United States
A list of country's mines and projects.
Full profiles of select mines and projects.
  • Overview
  • Owners
  • Geology
  • Mining
  • Processing
  • Production
  • Reserves
  • Costs & Financials
  • Fleet
  • Personnel
  • Filings & News

Thank you for browsing through mine profiles compiled by the Mining Data Online team.

Would you like to subcribe or schedule a Demo?
  • Name:
     
  • Company:
     
  • Position:
     
  • Phone:
  • Email:
  • Message:

Overview

StagePermitting
Mine TypeUnderground
Commodities
  • Gold
  • Silver
Mining Method
  • Mechanized Cut & Fill
  • Cemented backfill
  • Backfill
Processing
  • Smelting
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Carbon in leach (CIL)
  • Elution
  • Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
  • Cyanide (reagent)
Mine Life7.8 years (as of Jan 1, 2020)
Latest NewsParamount Gold Nevada Corp.: 2021 Year in Review     January 14, 2022


Owners

Source: p. 29
CompanyInterestOwnership
Calico Resources USA Corp. 100 % Direct
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. 100 % Indirect
Calico, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Paramount, owns and controls 100% of the mineral tenure of the unpatented mining claims, patented mining claims, and mining leases that comprise the Grassy Mountain Project.

Deposit Type

  • Breccia pipe / Stockwork
  • Epithermal
  • Vein / narrow vein


Summary:

The geological setting, hydrothermal alteration, styles of gold-silver mineralization, and close spatial and timing association with silica sinter deposition, indicate that Grassy Mountain is an example of the hot-springs subtype of low-sulfidation, epithermal precious-metals deposits. The Grassy Mountain deposit is characterized by stacked sinter terraces that demonstrate hydrothermal fluids vented at the paleosurface concurrent with lacustrine and intermittent fluvial sedimentation.

The Grassy Mountain gold–silver deposit is located largely within the silicic and potassic alteration, zones, beginning approximately 200 ft below the surface. The deposit has extents of 1,900 ft along a N60°E to N70°E axis, as much as 2,700 ft in a northwest-southeast direction, and as much as 1,240 ft vertically. The surface expression of the mineralization is indicated by weak to moderately strong silicification and iron-staining, accompanied by scattered, 1/8- to 1.0-inch wide creamy to light-gray chalcedonic veins that filled joints.

The deposit consists of a central higher-grade core with gold grades of >~0.03 oz/ton Au that is surrounded by a broad envelope of lower-grade mineralization. The central higher-grade core is almost 1,000 ft long on the N60°E to N70°E axis, by 450 ft in width and 450 ft in vertical extent, all of which is above the Kern Basin Tuff and below a distinctive sinter unit.

Central Higher-Grade Core Zone
Three distinct and overlapping types of gold–silver mineralization are recognized within the central core of the deposit. These are gold-bearing chalcedonic quartz ± adularia veins, disseminated mineralization in silicified siltstone and arkose, and gold and silver in bodies of clay matrix breccia.

Zones of high-grade mineralization are defined by the presence of chalcedonic quartz ± adularia veins. Mineralized quartz ± adularia vein types include single, banded, colloform, brecciated and calcitepseudomorphed veins. Colloform veins tend to carry the highest grades (>0.5 oz/ton Au), with visible gold to as much as 0.02 inches associated with argentite. Veins with relict bladed calcite texture also contain higher gold grades than the banded and single vein types. Gold mostly occurs as electrum along the vein margins or within microscopic voids. Some veins carry very little grade or are barren. At least some of the higher-grade zones of veins are thought to strike approximately N70°E.

Vein widths range from 1/16 to ~2.0 inches. Individually, such narrow veins are unlikely to have lateral or vertical extents of significance, but vein frequency can average one vein per foot in places. Vein swarms have strike lengths of 400 to 700 ft and vertical extents of 100 to 250 ft at elevations of 3,150 to 3,400 ft. Individual veins are too narrow to trace or correlate from hole to hole.

A steep southerly dip (70–85°) of the veins is inferred from vein intersection angles with drill core axes and bedding. Veins are mostly perpendicular to bedding, which generally dips 10–25° NNE within the deposit. Vein intersection angles of 10–25° to the core axis were mostly recorded in core holes GMC001 to GMC-008 angled at -50° at S20°E, compared with 25° to 50° intersection angles in holes GMC009 to GMC-011 angled -50° at N20°W. The N70°E strike of the veins is supported by: 1) surface mapping, 2) vein orientation perpendicular to bedding, 3) grade-thickness contouring, and 4) the overall trend in mineralization with grades in excess of ~0.03 oz/ton Au.

The veins crosscut the silicified sediments and have extremely sharp grade boundaries with the sediments. Vein frequency diminishes abruptly below an elevation of ~3,000 ft at the west–southwest limit of the higher-grade core to ~3,100 ft at the east-northeastern limit, and very few high-grade veins were encountered above the higher-grade core of the deposit

Within the higher-grade core, high gold grades are also present in silicified siltstone and arkose with no visible veins. In these cases, gold and silver are inferred to be very finely disseminated in a stratiform manner in the silicified rock. Fine-grained pyrite is commonly disseminated in the silicified siltstone and sandstone where oxidation has not occurred. Contacts between siltstone and arkose beds seem to be more favorable and carry higher gold grades. In places, beds of tuff and tuffaceous siltstone appear to be particularly favorable host for higher-grade mineralization that lacks associated veins.

The third style of gold–silver mineralization was referred to by Newmont and later operators as “clay matrix breccia”, bodies of which may be more prevalent in the lower portion of the higher- grade core of the deposit. These bodies are interpreted to extend at near-vertical angles up and down into the surrounding, low-grade gold-silver envelope. Clay matrix breccias are mainly of clast-supported types and contain sub-rounded to sub-angular, sand- to boulder-sized clasts of silicified and/or veined arkose and siltstone with minor amounts of clay and iron-oxide minerals between the clasts. In drill core, clay matrix breccia intervals are intersected over lengths of as much as several tens of feet, but their true thickness and exact orientations are poorly understood, in part because their margins are commonly irregular-to-gradational and not planar, except where structural fabrics related to fault movement are evident. In some cases, it is difficult to discern where clay matrix breccias end and similar fault-related breccias begin; it is possible the two are in some cases genetically related.

Lower-Grade Envelope
Lower-grade mineralization envelopes the higher-grade core and, farther from the core, extends outwards as stratiform, mineralized lenses parallel to bedding. There are very few visible chalcedonic veins; the gold and silver are inferred to be disseminated within the silicified arkose and siltstone units. Contacts between arkose, siltstone, and sinter appear to have been preferentially mineralized, and beds of tuff and tuffaceous siltstone also were favorable sites for mineralization. Low-grade mineralization is also present in numerous intervals of silica sinter, but not all sinter intervals are mineralized. Sinter-hosted mineralization may be disseminated, or within fractures where the sinter has been structurally disrupted.


Mining Methods

  • Mechanized Cut & Fill
  • Cemented backfill
  • Backfill


Summary:

The Grassy Mountain mine will be an underground operation accessed via one decline and a system of internal ramps. One ventilation raise is included in the design to be used for ventilation and secondary egress. The mechanized cut-and-fill mining method was selected. The mining direction will be underhand. Cemented rock fill (CRF) will be used for backfill. The mechanized cut-and-fill method is highly flexible and can achieve high recovery rates in deposits with complex geometries, as is the case at the Grassy Mountain deposit. The estimated mine life is eight years.

The mining sequence contains a detailed level sequence and an underhand sequence. The level access is mined first. The mains are mined second. Typically, two mains are mined at the same time providing multiple mining locations on a level. After the mains are mined, then the production drifts can begin mining. The production drifts are sequenced with primaries and secondaries. The primaries are mined and backfilled first. This continues until the entire level is complete. After the entire level is complete the level access is backfilled. The underhand sequence is grouped into lifts. One level in each lift can be mining at any given time during the life of mine. The underhand sequence starts at the top and works down in elevation. Constraints will be applied to ensure that the bottom level of a lift does not influence the top level of the lift below.

The portal is designed to allow access to the underground mine facilities while providing adequate space for equipment and vehicles. It will be located uphill and approximately 750 ft south of the primary crusher, at an approximate elevation of 3,749 ft. Weak rock mass ground conditions at the portal require that a shallow box-cut excavation be established to form a suitable face where tunneling can occur.

The Grassy Mountain orebody will be accessed using a 15 x 15 ft main decline, developed from a portal on surface. The decline will provide the connection to all services. The design intent is to have the decline located as close as possible to the mineralization in order to reduce transportation costs, but sufficiently removed from mining activities to ensure that the decline is geotechnically stable for the planned life-of-mine (LOM).

The mine design was based on an average production rate of 1,200 tons per day using a four-day-on and three-day-off schedule, with two 12-hour shifts per day, to provide 24-hour coverage during the four operating days at full operation. This will provide sufficient material to feed 750 tons/d to the mill on a seven day per week basis.

The mining cycle involves drilling, blasting, and mucking for the development and production access. The final part of the mining cycle is to backfill the stopes.


Crushing and Grinding
Flow Sheet: Source
Crusher / Mill TypeModelSizePowerQuantity
Jaw crusher ....................... Subscription required 1
Cone crusher ....................... Subscription required 1
Ball mill 12' x 16' 1341 HP 1

Summary:

Crushing Circuit
The crushing facility will be a two-stage crushing circuit that will process the run-of-mine (ROM) ore at an average rate of 45 tons/hour. The major equipment and facilities at the ROM receiving and crushing areas will include:
-Ore stockpile;
-ROM hopper;
-Vibrating pan feeder;
-Primary jaw crusher;
-Coarse ore screen;
-Secondary crusher surge bin;
-Secondary crusher vibrating feeder;
-Secondary cone crusher;
-Fine ore bin;
=Feed and product conveyors.

Ore will be trucked from underground and dumped directly into the ROM hopper or onto the outdoor stockpile during crushing circuit downtime. A front-end loader will reclaim ore from the stockpile and move it to the ROM hopper as necessary.

The ROM hopper will continuously feed a vibrating pan feeder which will discharge into the primary jaw crusher. After primary crushing, the ore conveyor will bring the ore to a coarse ore screen. A belt magnet at the end of the ore conveyor will be present to prevent pieces of metal from continuing onto the coarse ore screen.

Oversize from this screen will be transferred by the secondary crusher feed conveyor to the secondary crusher surge bin. This conveyor will be fitted with a metal detector for the secondary crushing circuit to be temporarily shut down for tramp metal removal. Ore from the secondary crusher surge bin will pass over the second crusher vibrating feeder and into the secondary crusher. After secondary crushing, the ore will recirculate to the coarse ore screen in combination with ore from the primary jaw crusher via the ore conveyor.

Undersize from the coarse ore screen will be taken by the product conveyor to the fine ore bin. The product conveyor will have a weightometer to monitor the crushing circuit throughput.

The fine ore bin discharge feeder will feed ore from the fine ore bin onto the ball mill feed conveyor and over to the grinding circuit and will be fitted with a weightometer to provide data for feed-rate control to the grinding circuit.

Grinding Circuit
The grinding circuit will have an average feed rate of 34.2 tons/hour and will consist of a ball mill and a cyclone cluster in a closed circuit. The recirculating load will have a maximum of 350%. The grinding circuit will be designed for a product size P80 of 150 mesh. The major equipment in the primary grinding circuit will include:

-One 12-ft diameter (inside shell) by 16-ft effective grinding length (EGL) single-pinion ball mill driven by a single 1,341 hp fixed-speed drive motor;
-One cyclone cluster.

As required, steel balls will be added into the ball mill using a ball bucket and ball charging chute to maintain grinding efficiency.

Crushed ore will travel along the ball mill feed conveyor and discharge directly into the ball mill via the mill feed chute. Process water will be added to reach a pulp density of 72% solids (by weight) through the ball mill, which will then discharge to the cyclone feed pump box. Trash or broken mill balls will be discharged to a scats bunker and removed by a front-end loader. Additional process water will be added to the cyclone feed pump box to achieve a density of 63.5% solids, which will then be pumped to the cyclone cluster. The cyclone underflow will recirculate to the mill feed chute. The cyclone overflow will discharge at 45% solids and report to a trash screen. Trash screen oversize will be sent to a trash bin. The slurry will then flow by gravity to the pre-aeration tank.

Maintenance activities in the grinding and classification area will be serviced by a mill area crane, and a grinding area hoist, which will be used for ball-mill charging duties and minor lifts. Spillages in the grinding and classification area will be pumped by the grinding area sump pump into the cyclone-feed pump box.


Processing

  • Smelting
  • Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
  • Carbon in leach (CIL)
  • Elution
  • Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
  • Cyanide (reagent)

Flow Sheet: Subscription required

Summary:

The process plant is designed for treatment of 750 tons/d or 34 tons/hour based on an availability of 7,998 hours per annum or 91.3%. The crushing section design is set at 70% availability and the gold room availability is set at 52 weeks per year including two operating days and one smelting day per week. The plant is designed to operate with two shifts per day, 365 days per year, and will produce doré bars.

The process flowsheet was developed based on data developed in the 2018 PFS, together with updated information from metallurgical testwork as outlined in Section 13. The crushing and grinding circuit sizing were determined using in-house Bruno and Ausgrind simulations, respectively. During the 2020 FS, the flowsheet developed during the 2018 PFS was modified to a simpler, lower capital cost alternative comprising:
-Two-stage crushing circuit;
-Grinding circuit;
-Hybrid leach-CIL circuit with pre-aeration;
-Mercury removal circuit;
-Cyanide dest ........

Recoveries & Grades:

CommodityParameterAvg. LOM
Gold Recovery Rate, % 92.8
Gold Head Grade, oz/ton 0.19
Silver Recovery Rate, % 73.5
Silver Head Grade, oz/ton 0.28

Projected Production:

CommodityProductUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Gold Payable metal koz 361
Gold Metal in doré koz 47362
Silver Payable metal koz  ......  Subscription required
Silver Metal in doré koz  ......  Subscription required  ......  Subscription required
Gold Equivalent Payable metal koz  ......  Subscription required

Operational Metrics:

Metrics
Daily milling rate  ......  Subscription required
Daily ore mining rate  ......  Subscription required
Waste tonnes, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ......  Subscription required
Tonnes milled, LOM  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2020 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Reserves at March 31, 2020:

CategoryOreTypeTonnage CommodityGradeContained Metal
Proven Total 260 k tons Gold 0.18 oz/ton 47 koz
Proven Total 260 k tons Silver 0.26 oz/ton 68 koz
Probable Total 1,652 k tons Gold 0.2 oz/ton 333 koz
Probable Total 1,652 k tons Silver 0.29 oz/ton 486 koz
Proven & Probable Total 1,911 k tons Gold 0.2 oz/ton 380 koz
Proven & Probable Total 1,911 k tons Silver 0.29 oz/ton 554 koz
Measured In-Situ (OP) 18,158,000 tons Gold 0.02 oz/ton 366 koz
Measured In-Situ (UG) 32,000 tons Gold 0.09 oz/ton 3 koz
Measured Total 18,190,000 tons Gold 0.02 oz/ton 369 koz
Measured In-Situ (OP) 18,158,000 tons Silver 0.079 oz/ton 1,434 koz
Measured In-Situ (UG) 32,000 tons Silver 0.125 oz/ton 4 koz
Measured Total 18,190,000 tons Silver 0.079 oz/ton 1,438 koz
Indicated In-Situ (OP) 12,651,000 tons Gold 0.054 oz/ton 685 koz
Indicated In-Situ (UG) 61,000 tons Gold 0.095 oz/ton 6 koz
Indicated Total 12,712,000 tons Gold 0.054 oz/ton 691 koz
Indicated In-Situ (OP) 12,651,000 tons Silver 0.147 oz/ton 1,854 koz
Indicated In-Situ (UG) 61,000 tons Silver 0.121 oz/ton 7 koz
Indicated Total 12,712,000 tons Silver 0.146 oz/ton 1,861 koz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (OP) 30,809,000 tons Gold 0.034 oz/ton 1,051 koz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (UG) 93,000 tons Gold 0.093 oz/ton 9 koz
Measured & Indicated Total 30,902,000 tons Gold 0.034 oz/ton 1,060 koz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (OP) 30,809,000 tons Silver 0.107 oz/ton 3,288 koz
Measured & Indicated In-Situ (UG) 93,000 tons Silver 0.122 oz/ton 11 koz
Measured & Indicated Total 30,902,000 tons Silver 0.107 oz/ton 3,299 koz
Inferred In-Situ (OP) 981,000 tons Gold 0.04 oz/ton 40 koz
Inferred In-Situ (UG) 23,000 tons Gold 0.075 oz/ton 1.7 koz
Inferred Total 1,004,000 tons Gold 0.041 oz/ton 41 koz
Inferred In-Situ (OP) 981,000 tons Silver 0.12 oz/ton 118 koz
Inferred In-Situ (UG) 23,000 tons Silver 0.087 oz/ton 2 koz
Inferred Total 1,004,000 tons Silver 0.12 oz/ton 120 koz

Commodity Production Costs:

CommodityUnitsAverage
Cash costs Gold USD  ......  Subscription required *†
All-in sustaining costs (AISC) Gold USD  ......  Subscription required *†
Assumed price Silver USD  ......  Subscription required *
Assumed price Gold USD  ......  Subscription required *
* According to 2020 study / presentation.
† Net of By-Product.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Operating Costs:

Units2020
UG mining costs ($/ton milled) USD 58.2 *
Processing costs ($/ton milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
Total operating costs ($/ton milled) USD  ......  Subscription required
* According to 2020 study.
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

2020 Study Costs and Valuation Metrics :

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Initial CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Sustaining CapEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Closure costs $M USD  ......  Subscription required
UG OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Processing OpEx $M USD 57.5
G&A costs $M USD 29.9
Total OpEx $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Total Taxes $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Royalty payments $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Gross revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Net revenue (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
EBITDA (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M USD  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscription required
Pre-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
After-tax payback period, years  ......  Subscription required
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Proposed Heavy Mobile Equipment as of September 15, 2020:
HME TypeModelSizeQuantityLeased or
Contractor
Concrete sprayer ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Leased
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Mine Management:

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Oct 22, 2021
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Oct 22, 2021
Subscription required - Subscription is required.


Corporate Filings & Presentations:

DocumentYear
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2020
................................... Subscription required 2019
Press Release 2018
Year-end Mineral Reserves 2017
Preliminary Economic Assessment 2015
Subscription required - Subscription is required.

News:

NewsDate
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.: 2021 Year in Review January 14, 2022
Paramount Gold Submits State Permit Application for Its Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine December 22, 2021
Paramount Gold Submits Plan of Operation For Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine to Federal Bureau of Land Management December 16, 2021
Paramount Gold Granted Conditional Use Permit Extension From Malheur County to Start Construction at Its Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine July 20, 2021
Paramount Announces Positive Assay Results From Geotechnical Drill Holes With the Potential to Reclassify Waste Rock as Ore July 8, 2021
Paramount Gold Reports on Permitting Progress at Grassy Mountain With Oregon State Regulators March 22, 2021
Paramount Gold Files Technical Report on Feasibility Study for the Grassy Mountain Gold Project in Eastern Oregon October 30, 2020
Paramount Gold’s Feasibility Study Confirms Economic Viability of the Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine With an After-Tax NPV of $105 Million September 15, 2020
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.: Grassy Mountain Tailings Dam Design Receives Key Approval From Oregon Water Resource Department July 14, 2020
Paramount Gold Nevada Submits Mine Plan of Operation to Federal Bureau of Land Management and Provides Update on State Permitting Progress February 26, 2020
Paramount Gold Granted Water Permit to Operate Grassy Mountain Gold Mine in Eastern Oregon January 14, 2020
Paramount Gold Submits Permit Application to Oregon State Agencies for Its Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Project November 18, 2019
Paramount Gold Enters Into An Agreement With Ausenco To Complete A Bankable Feasibility Study On Its Grassy Mountain Project June 25, 2019
Paramount Gold Receives Permit From Malheur County for its Proposed Grassy Mountain Underground Mine in Eastern Oregon June 4, 2019
Paramount Gold Reports Continued Progress With Oregon State Regulators in the Permitting of Grassy Mountain May 6, 2019
Paramount Gold Reports Continued Permitting Progress for Its Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine January 23, 2019
Paramount Gold Files Application for Conditional Use Permit for Its Proposed Grassy Mountain Gold Mine in Eastern Oregon January 17, 2019
Grassy Mountain Permitting: Two Additional Baseline Reports Approved by Oregon State Regulators October 31, 2018
Paramount Gold Nevada Announces $3 Million Private Placement With Proceeds to Advance Permitting at Grassy Mountain June 26, 2018
Paramount Gold Nevada Announces Positive PFS for Its Proposed Underground Mine at Grassy Mountain May 24, 2018
Paramount Gold Nevada on Track to Complete Pre-Feasibility Study for Grassy Mountain Project in Early 2018 November 2, 2017

Aerial view:

Subscription required - Subscription is required.

Terms of Use Privacy Policy © 2017-2022 MDO Data Online Inc.