Overview
Stage | Production |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
Production Start | 1996 |
Mine Life | 2036 |
The current life of mine for Carmen de Andacollo is expected to continue until 2036; however, additional permitting or amendments will be required to operate through to 2036. |
Latest News | Teck Announces 2022 Production and 2023 Guidance January 30, 2023 |
Source:
p. 33
Teck owns a 90% interest in the mine. The remaining 10% is owned by Empresa Nacional de Minería (ENAMI), a state-owned Chilean mining company.
Deposit Type
- Hybrid
- Stratabound
- Porphyry
- Vein / narrow vein
Source:
p.28-29
Summary:
The Carmen de Andacollo orebody is a porphyry copper deposit consisting of disseminated and fracture-controlled copper mineralization contained within a gently dipping sequence of andesitic to trachytic volcanic rocks and sub volcanic intrusions. The mineralization is spatially related to a feldspar porphyry intrusion and a series of deeply-rooted fault structures. A primary copper-gold sulphide deposit (the “hypogene deposit”) containing principally disseminated and quartz veinhosted chalcopyrite mineralization lies beneath the supergene deposit. The hypogene deposit was subjected to surface weathering processes resulting in the formation of a barren leached zone 10 to 60 metres thick.
The original copper sulphides leached from this zone were re-deposited below the barren leached zone as a copper-rich zone comprised of copper silicates (chrysocolla) and supergene copper sulphides (chalcocite with lesser covellite).
Carmen de Andacollo deposit has “hybrid” features with elements of Porphyry Copper and Stratabound deposits. The structural domain model consists of the following main faults, sorted by relative age from the oldest to the youngest: 1) Syn-Mineralization: Carmen Fault and Hermosa-Twila-Andacollo Set. 2) PostMineralization: NS and NE Faults. Six big configurable lithology groups were identified: Lower Volcanic Unit, Upper Volcanic Unit, Intrusive Rocks Unit, Breccia Unit, Undifferentiated Rocks, and gravels. Nine mineralization events associated with nine alterations events have been described. The mineralization/oxidation zones at Carmen de Andacollo are controlling influence on the Cu grades. From top to bottom in the profile the major mineralization zones are: Gravel, leached zone and oxide, strong and weak secondary enrichment and primary zone.
Nine mineralization events related to nine alterations events have been described, divided in 3 domains:
a) Primary Mineralization in Late magmatic Domain: chalcopyrite-bornite (traces), magnetite-chalcopyrite and chalcopyrite-molybdenite, related to Potassic Alteration with dominating Secondary Biotite; chalcopyrite-bornite related to Potassic Alteration with dominating Potassic Feldspar; chalcopyrite-magnetite-specularite-(bornite)-pyrite(?) associated with Albitic Alteration; pyrite, pyritechalcopyrite (traces), specularite-chalcopyrite (traces) and magnetite-chalcopyrite (traces) associated with Propylitic Alteration.
b) Primary Mineralization in Phyllic Domain: pyrite, pyrite-chalcopyrite asociations in Main Phyllic Alteration; pyrite (coarse), and pyrite-chalcopyrite-tennantite enargitetetrahedrite associated with Late Phyllic Alteration.
c) Primary and Secondary Mineralization in Argillic Domain: pyrite-cinnabar, pyrite-tennantite-enargite, cinnabar and pyrite-tennantite-chalcopyrite in Intermediate Argillic Alteration; chalcocite, chalcocite-(covellite) and supergene cinnabar (?) associated with Supergene Argillic Alteration.
The mineralization/oxidation zones at Carmen de Andacollo are a controlling influence on the Cu grades. From top to bottom in the profile the major mineralization zones are:
This is generally considered to be recent transported sediments. There are a few instances where this material is (was) old waste dumps from historic underground mines. Any material in this zone that contains Cu grades has already been mined.
The Leached Zone is defined by the presence of Fe-Oxides without Cu-oxides or any sulphides. The Oxide Zone is defined by the presence of Fe-Oxides and Cu-oxides without any sulphides. These two zones were combined for the estimation. The logged presence/absence of Copper oxides did not create a visible correlation to the Cu grades. There were significant grades within material logged as Leach (i.e. no visible Cu oxides) that would make the separation of these zones questionable.
Strong Secondary Enrichment (ESEC1). This zone is traditionally referred to as the Supergene Zone. It is defined by the presence of secondary Cusulphides, predominantly chalcocite, without the presence of chalcopyrite. While most drillholes showed this contact as a sharp contrast in CNCu there were some drillholes (~5%) that showed significant enrichment beyond this point. A second interpretation pass was needed displaying the CNCu value. If there was significant CNCu beyond the logged contact then the contact was moved to the point at which there was a sharp decline in CNCu grade.
Weak Secondary Enrichment (ESEC2). This zone is defined by the presence of Chalcocite and Chalcopyrite. The logging of small amounts of Chalcocite is inconsistent so this boundary contains significant amount of interpretation. It was considered that with the presence of Chalcopyrite, the dominant grade variability characteristics are the same as the Primary zone.This zone was used for defining Metallurgical characteristics.
Primary Zone. This zone is defined by the presence of primary minerals such as Chalcopyrite, Pyrite, Bornite, Tennantite, and no secondary Cu. PRIMC: Primary Zone featuring cavities. Rock fractures and cavities do not evidence or may be partially filled with gypsum. In the case of the latter, the roof of this area is called a “sulphate top” (TDSO4). PRIMS: Primary Zone with no cavities. Rock fractures and cavities are completely filled with gypsum (±anhydrite). The roof of this area is called a “dominant sulphate top” (TDSO4) and marks the end of supergene activity at the deposit. Top of carbonate – TCO3: Surface that marks the upper limit of the area featuring fractures and veinlets filled with calcite. Water is noticeably less acidic under this limit than the water above the limit.
Source:
Summary:
The Carmen de Andacollo mine is an open pit mine which produced copper concentrate from hypogene ore.
Traditional truck and shovel mining method with preliminary drilling and blasting operations is utilizing for extracting ore.
Source:
Processing
- Crush & Screen plant
- Flotation
- Heap leach
- Dewatering
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
Source:
Summary:
The Carmen de Andacollo operation includes a heap leach copper operation and a copper-gold hypogene concentrator.
Copper concentrate is produced by processing hypogene ore through semi-autogenous grinding and a flotation plant with the capacity to process up to 55,000 tonnes of ore per day depending on ore hardness. Some supergene ore is also mined, which is transported to heap leach pads. Copper-bearing solutions are processed in an SX-EW plant to produce grade A copper cathode.
Copper concentrates produced at Carmen de Andacollo are trucked to the port of Coquimbo, Chile and from there by ship to customers in Asia and Europe. Copper cathode from Carmen de Andacollo mine is trucked from the mine and sold primarily under annual contracts to customers in Asia, Europe and North America.
Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Copper
|
Recovery Rate, %
| 83.8 | 85.5 | 88.4 | 86.9 | 89 | 89 | 88.6 |
Copper
|
Head Grade, %
| 0.3 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.45 |
Production:
Commodity | Product | Units | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Copper
|
Metal in concentrate
|
kt
| 45-50 ^ | 44 | 55 | 52 | 64 | 72 | 70 |
Copper
|
Cathode
|
kt
| | 1.3 | 2 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Gold
|
Metal in concentrate
|
koz
| | 36 | 49 | 47 | 60 | 54 | 53 |
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Total tonnes mined
| 26,766 kt | 27,185 kt | 20,763 kt | 24,140 kt | 26,516 kt | 28,837 kt |
Tonnes milled
| 17,538 kt | 18,144 kt | 14,987 kt | 18,466 kt | 17,274 kt | 17,861 kt |
Reserves at December 31, 2021:
Category | OreType | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Recoverable Metal |
Proven
|
Sulphide
|
103,000 kt
|
Copper
|
0.33 %
|
|
Proven
|
Sulphide
|
103,000 kt
|
Gold
|
0.1 g/t
|
|
Probable
|
Sulphide
|
178,600 kt
|
Copper
|
0.31 %
|
|
Probable
|
Sulphide
|
178,600 kt
|
Gold
|
0.1 g/t
|
|
Proven & Probable
|
Sulphide
|
281,600 kt
|
Copper
|
0.31 %
|
690 kt
|
Proven & Probable
|
Sulphide
|
281,600 kt
|
Gold
|
0.1 g/t
|
550 koz
|
Measured
|
Sulphide
|
41,500 kt
|
Copper
|
0.28 %
|
|
Measured
|
Sulphide
|
41,500 kt
|
Gold
|
0.11 g/t
|
|
Indicated
|
Sulphide
|
353,900 kt
|
Copper
|
0.25 %
|
|
Indicated
|
Sulphide
|
353,900 kt
|
Gold
|
0.09 g/t
|
|
Inferred
|
Sulphide
|
72,600 kt
|
Copper
|
0.25 %
|
|
Inferred
|
Sulphide
|
72,600 kt
|
Gold
|
0.08 g/t
|
|
Financials:
| Units | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Revenue
|
M CAD
| 547.8 | 491.1 | 438 |
542
|
610
|
446
|
Gross profit
|
M CAD
| 170 | 105.6 | 26 |
134
|
157
|
10
|
Type | Material | Diameter | Length | Description |
HME Type | Model | Quantity | Ref. Date |
Drill
|
Epiroc DM45
|
2
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Drill
|
Atlas Copco ROC L8
|
1
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Loader
|
Caterpillar 994F
|
1
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Loader
|
Caterpillar 992G
|
1
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Shovel
|
O&K RH200
|
2
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Shovel
|
O&K RH40
|
1
|
Apr 1, 2012
|
Truck (haul)
|
Caterpillar 777D
|
4
|
Aug 1, 2016
|
Truck (haul)
|
Caterpillar 789C
|
7
|
Aug 1, 2016
|
Mine Management:
Job Title | Name | Profile | Ref. Date |
Chief Metallurgist
|
Christian Jara
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
Environmental Manager
|
Paulina Soledad Puentes Diaz
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
Environmental Superintendent
|
Ximena Retamal Carrillo
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
General Manager
|
Manuel Novoa
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
Health & Safety Superintendent
|
Carlos Olivares
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
Mobile Equipment Maintenance Superintendent
|
Erwin Honores
|
|
Apr 29, 2022
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
News: