Mining Intelligence and News
United Kingdom

Hemerdon (Drakelands) Mine

Click for more information

Categories

Summary

Mine TypeOpen Pit
Study CompletedFeasibility
StageRestarting
Commodities
  • Tungsten
  • Tin
Mining Method
  • Truck & Shovel / Loader
Project Timeline... Lock
Mine Life... Lock
SnapshotThe Hemerdon Deposit represents a ‘granite related, sheeted vein’ mineralised system which has been mined using conventional open-pit mining techniques.

The Project has experienced periods of production in 1915-1919, 1930s-1944, and more recently by Wolf Minerals Limited who operated the mine with production taking place between 2015 and 2018.

The acquisition of Hemerdon Tungsten Project included land, mineral rights, and existing planning permissions, enabling TW to resume operations. Mining at Hemerdon will be undertaken by conventional open pit drill-blast-load-haul mining operations. Historic mining on site means that the open pit is ready for commencement of mining without the need for any significant access or pre-stripping works.

The project consists of an open pit mine, MPF, and MWF.
Latest NewsTungsten West: Completion of Updated Feasibility Study     August 5, 2025

Owners

SourceSource
CompanyInterestOwnership
Tungsten West plc 100 % Indirect
Drakelands Restoration Ltd. (operator) 100 % Direct
Tungsten West Plc holds a combination of 36 freehold and 45 leasehold land titles, along with a mineral lease registered under title DN643856. The mineral rights are historically complex, often separated from surface land ownership.

The site was previously developed and operated by Wolf Minerals before entering receivership in 2018. Following this, Hargreaves (UK) Services Ltd (HUKS) acquired the asset and set up a special purchase vehicle Drakelands Restoration Ltd. (DRL).

HUKS subsequently sold the Project to TW, which now has 100% ownership of Drakelands Restoration Ltd. The acquisition included land, mineral rights, and existing planning permissions, enabling Tungsten West to resume operations.

Contractors

Lock

- subscription is required.

Deposit type

  • Intrusion related
  • Hydrothermal
  • Vein / narrow vein

Summary:

The Hemerdon deposit comprises a granite intrusive surrounded by Devonian metasediments, metavolcanics, and mafics which are collectively defined as Killas. The upper portion of the granite has been altered, resulting in kaolinization of the upper granite. Mineralization is primarily situated within the granite, with lower amounts of contained metal defined in the Killas.

Whilst the overall geology is well understood, the mineralization itself is more complex. Exploration of the deposit has previously largely focused on the tungsten mineralization, with less work undertaken to understand the tin content.

The deposit is centralised around a small granite dyke to the immediate SW of the larger Dartmoor, and Crown Hill granites, and is older by some margin, with recent studies providing a date of 292Ma placing it as the oldest granite in SW England. The granite is oriented NNE-SSW over a length of 1,200m and averages 150m wide in the mine portion, but broadens at its South Western extremity up to 450m and is complemented by series of smaller granite dykes to the NE.

Proximity to major NW-SE fault zones that controlled migration of early melts from lower / middle / upper crust; dilation along an earlier NNE-SSW segment allowed emplacement of the Hemerdon Dyke and formed persistent 'chimney' (magmatic-hydrothermal fluid pathway) during continued crystallisation of deeper magma batches; faults repeatedly reactivated as transfers.

Proximity to the Landulph High influenced the development of extensional fault zones and tensile fractures in the Hemerdon Dyke and surrounding host rocks during Early Permian post-Variscan extension; repeated movements created effective permeability networks (fault-fracture meshes) during the continued release of magmatic-hydrothermal fluids.

The granite is intruded into a package of southerly dipping interbedded Devonian metasediments and metavolcaniclastics of the South Devon Basin that have been intruded by a series of mafic intrusives, ranging from basaltic to gabbroic in texture.

The open pit is centred around the main Hemerdon Granite termed the G10 granite, which is kaolinized near surface. An additional lens of kaolinization within the G10 granite is noted at depth and is proposed to have been generated in response to hydrothermal alteration. To the immediate north-east of the G10 granite is another smaller granite body termed the G20 granite.

Surrounding the granites are the Killas metasediments, metavolcanics, and mafic units comprising:
-Claymoor Member: Located at the northern end of the deposit, comprising a series of grey siltstones, very fine sandstones, and rare tuffaceous beds.
-Drakelands Member: Located on the eastern and western flanks of the deposit, comprises fine sandstones grading to mudstones with occasional medium-grained sandstones and rare tuffaceous laminae.
-Bickland Member: Located at the southern end of the deposit, comprising volcaniclastic units of tuff, lapilli tuff, and agglomerate interbedded within the fining sandstone to mudstone package. Basalt is also present.
-Mafic units cross-cut the Killas units and vary in composition from basaltic to gabbroic (dolerite).

Mineralization
Mineralization at the Hemerdon deposit is complex and has been the subject of a number of studies. The mineralization comprises both tungsten and tin and is developed as a sheeted-vein complex with mineralization centred around an old muscovite granite dyke sourced from early (low-T) muscovite-dominated partial melting (TWL, March 2021). Mineralization is hosted both within the granite as well as the adjacent Killas units.

The sheeted-vein complex has a moderate dip of 40-50° to the NW and comprises quartz-greisen and quartz veins hosting ferberite (FeWO4) an iron-rich end member of the manganese-iron wolframite solid solution series with lesser amounts of wolframite, and minor cassiterite (SnO2). In addition, NNE striking, sub-vertical quartz feldspar veins also host ferberite cassiterite. Mineralization within the deposit also includes lesser amounts of arsenopyrite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite, which are typically limited to the northern and southern extents of the orebody.

Ferberite mineralization can be found as crystal intergrowth masses within the quartz veins, and can display porosity which was termed by AMAX, and subsequently TWL as "sponginess". The ferberite mineralization can be friable when subjected to impact or comminution forces generating smaller size fractions.

The friable nature of the ferberite impacted the previous Wolf processing operations through inadvertent autogenous grinding within the attrition scrubber and subsequent losses of finegrained ferberite to the MWF. Through better understanding the ferberite characteristics, TWL has considered the impact of mineralogy on the proposed processing plant flowsheet.

The porosity generated by the crystal intergrowths of ferberite also make the ferberite more susceptible to hematization under oxidizing conditions, by providing a greater surface area. Through hematization of the ferberite minerals, the resultant hematite mineralization can be leached, resulting in increased porosity and reduced specific gravity (SG) of the ferberite crystal mass.

TWL has recognized the impact this reduction in ferberite SG has on tungsten recovery using a gravity circuit. Under the previous Wolf MPF operating practice the reduced SG, of the hematized ferberite would place it closer to the SG of gangue minerals, resulting in losses to the MWF.

TWL has undertaken geo-metallurgical studies to better understand the mineralization and potential implications for the processing route. As part of the third-stage orebody variability study, TWL focused on a number of parameters that impact the processing route. These parameters include Fe and As content, kaolinization and the ferberite mineralogy.

The ferberite logging conducted by TWL shows that the degree of sponginess and hematisation decreases with depth which may aid improving process recoveries.

Weathering by meteoric waters in the upper 40 m of the deposit has resulted in the kaolinization of the near-surface part of the granite. In response to the kaolinization the sulphide minerals have been destroyed and the arsenic redistributed as arsenates or scorodite (FeAsO4.H2O) and pharmacosiderite (KFe4(AsO4)3(OH)4·(6-7)H2O). The kaolinization transitions from heavily altered to fresh granite. Where faulting is present, the depth of kaolinization increases, with the faults acting as fluid pathways.

In addition to its association with primary tungsten mineralization, tin mineralization also occurs within tourmaline (present as schorl, (Na(Fe2+3)Al6(Si6O18)(BO3)3(OH)3(OH)) stringers that strike E-W and are sub-vertical, and which post-date the primary mineralization. These tourmaline cassiterite stringers predominate in the north of the deposit. Tourmaline mineralization has also been identified with extensional faults dipping to the NW.

Crossing the deposit are a series of NW-SE striking strike-slip faults (cm scale) which result in a limited offset on a metre scale. The cross-cutting strike-slip faults are more frequently encountered in the northern part of the deposit becoming rarer in the south. They are enriched in iron (hematite (Fe2O3) and specularite (Fe2O3)) which in the pervasively kaolinized zone of the granite (up to 40 m below surface) has led to large zones of hematite and limonite alteration where iron has bled out from the primary fault structures around these areas (TWL, March 2021).

Reserves

Lock

- subscription is required.

Mining Methods

Lock

- subscription is required.

Required Heavy Mobile Equipment

Lock

- subscription is required.

Comminution

Crushers and Mills

Lock

- subscription is required.

Processing

Lock

- subscription is required.

Commodity Production

CommodityUnitsAvg. AnnualLOM
Tin t 4626,442
WO3 kt 3.346
All production numbers are expressed as metal in concentrate.

Operational metrics

Metrics
Reject, LOM  ....  Subscribe
Annual processing capacity  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
Waste tonnes, LOM  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
Ore tonnes mined, LOM  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
Total tonnes mined, LOM  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
Tonnes processed, LOM  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
Annual ore mining rate  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study.

Production Costs

CommodityAverageAverage
All-in sustaining costs (AISC) Tungsten  ....  Subscribe
C1 cash costs WO3  ....  Subscribe
Assumed price Tungsten  ....  Subscribe
Assumed price WO3  ....  Subscribe  ....  Subscribe
* According to 2025 study / presentation.
** Net of By-Product.

Project Costs

MetricsUnitsLOM Total
Pre-Production capital costs $M GBP  ......  Subscribe
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax Cash Flow (LOM) $M GBP  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 5% $M GBP  ......  Subscribe
After-tax NPV @ 7.5% $M USD  ......  Subscribe
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe
After-tax IRR, %  ......  Subscribe

Personnel

Mine Management

Job TitleNameProfileRef. Date
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Aug 25, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Aug 25, 2025
....................... Subscription required ....................... Subscription required Subscription required Aug 25, 2025

Workforce

Aerial view:

Lock

- subscription is required.