Source:
p. 24
Company | Interest | Ownership |
Trevali Mining Corp.
|
90 %
|
Indirect
|
Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation (Pty) Ltd.
(operator)
|
100 %
|
Direct
|
The Rosh Pinah Mine is owned by Rosh Pinah Zinc Corporation (Pty) Ltd. (“RPZC”). Trevali owns a 90% interest in RPZC and is operationally responsible for the management of RPZC, with the remainder held by PE Minerals (Namibia) (Proprietary) Limited (“PE Minerals”), Jaguar Investments Four (Proprietary) Limited (“Jaguar”) and an Employee Empowerment Participation Scheme (“EEPS”).
Summary:
The Rosh Pinah deposit is hosted by the Rosh Pinah Formation (Hilda Subgroup of the Port Nolloth Group), forming part of the Neoproterozoic Gariep Terrane deposited onto a Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic basement of granite gneisses and supracrustals. The Gariep Terrane is divided into two distinct tectono-stratigraphic sub-terranes; the eastern, para-autochthonous Port Nolloth Group and the western, allochthonous Marmora Terrane.
The base metal sulphides (BMS) at Rosh Pinah are contained within the approximately 30 m thick mineralized horizon, which is locally termed the ore equivalent horizon (OEH). In the Property, the Rosh Pinah Formation has been shown to be at least 1,250 m thick.
The major mineralization types are:
• Microquartzite and argillite;
• Arkose / breccia;
• Carbonate.
The Rosh Pinah deposit is hosted by a thick package of turbidites comprising hinterland and contemporaneous volcanic clastics deposited in a Neo-Proterozoic rift basin during the early part of the evolution of the Gariep Terrane of southern Namibia. Metals scavenged from a primary argillite mineralization were concentrated by late hydrothermally driven carbonate alteration, providing a carbonate host. Basin inversion led to oblique continental collision and complex deformation of the deposit, resulting in two phases of disharmonic overfolding with associated faulting and shearing.
The deposit is consequently presented as a series of discrete carbonate and exhalite lenses located on second-phase fold hinges or steeply plunging fold limbs connected by a partially attenuated exhalite-dominated OEH.
The Rosh Pinah mine has been historically interpreted as being predominantly a reworked SEDEX type deposit comprising a primary banded sulphide exhalite, part of which was carbonatized with associated remobilization and enrichment of sulphides. The secondary carbonate mineralization carries the higher, economic, base-metal values.
The base-metal bearing brines were exhaled onto the sea floor from the present-day Western Fault bounding the Rosh Pinah Graben, during a period of sediment paucity and/or high sea-level. Exhalation was accompanied by silicification and hydraulic brecciation of the footwall. The primary
mineralization was deposited at, or below, the sediment/seawater interface as stratiform, inter- banded, massive sulphide and cherty argillite (micro quartzite). Time between exhalative pulses determined the variation in ratio of content, of chert-exhalite and background argillitic sediment.
At some stage following primary SEDEX style mineralization deposition, the hydrothermal fluid chemistry changed to carbonitic, either due to introduction of primary volcanogenic carbonate fluids or as the plumbing system tapped carbonate sediments elsewhere in the sedimentary package. Carbonatization of the more porous, arenitic hangingwall and footwall took preference. On-going base-metal exhalation was supplemented by remobilization of primary mineralization into the hydrothermal carbonate.
Mining Methods
- Longitudinal open stoping
- Longhole open stoping
- Transverse open stoping
- Paste backfill
Summary:
Current mining method
Rosh Pinah is an existing operating underground mine with well-established mining methods. The current mining method is LHOS without backfill using a Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary top-down extraction sequence. Mining using this LHOS method since 1969 has resulted in significant voids within the historical and currently mined zones.
Ore is sourced from six steeply-dipping zones, with an increasing proportion sourced from the WF3 and AAB zones, as the eastern zone (EOF) and southern-central zone (SF3, SF3, and BME) are depleted.
Access to the production areas is via multiple interconnecting declines that provide fresh air intake into the mine. A new independent decline from surface to the WF3 zone is proposed.
The current mining areas use a LHOS Primary / Secondary extraction sequence with no backfill, except for WF3, which uses a LHOS Primary / Secondary / Tertiary extraction sequence with no backfill.
The current mining fleet consists of mechanized mobile and ancillary fleet including development jumbos, production drills, loaders and 30 t trucks for haulage to an underground crushing and conveying system (notionally called the Krupp). Future plans include the use of 60 t trucks to haul WF3 material directly to surface.
Current ore haulage is via a decline to the Krupp tip point comprising three ore silos in which to tip. Blending of the ore is conducted using the ore silos to maintain a consistent zinc and lead feed grade to the mill. Blended ore is conveyed from the Krupp to a surface crusher. Low grade mineralization is trucked to an underground void dedicated for this material. Waste material is trucked to dedicated historical stope voids.
Rosh Pinah Feasibility Study Expansion
Optimization strategy was used to investigate potential preferred operating parameters for the Rosh Pinah underground mine with the following results:
• Material above an NSR cut-off of US$80 NSR/t can be considered optimal, while recognizing that the full breakeven cut-off value of US$50/t maximizes economic Mineral Resource extraction;
• Increase mine production to 1.3 Mtpa (from the current 0.7 Mtpa);
• Expand the processing infrastructure to match the increase in mine production;
• Transition the current mining method (LHOS without backfill) to LHOS with paste fill with extraction in an inverted echelon Primary / Secondary (bottom-up) sequence to facilitate tight filling of stope voids;
• Use cemented paste fill within the mining cycle to improve regional and local stability, increase resource recovery and reduce the quantity of tailings directed to the tailings storage facility (TSF);
• Develop a dedicated trucking decline from WF3 to surface.
Historically, ore was extracted using a combination of mining methods including: LHOS without backfill, and in the upper flat-dipping zones, sill-and-bench, and room-and-pillar mining. LHOS without backfill has resulted in large continuous voids spanning multiple levels. Sill and rib pillars are currently used to manage span stability.
Transitioning the mining method from LHOS without backfill to LHOS with backfill (paste fill), within all zones where practicable, is recommended based on qualitative and quantitative assessment of key aspects. These include but are not limited to: geotechnical analysis (spans and global extraction sequence with depth), lens geometry, safety (mitigate risk of air blast from uncontrolled large overbreak), improved mining recovery, and reduced dilution.
LHOS without backfill will continue to be utilized within selected areas, typically within historical mining areas or to complete a grouped mining sequence, with a progressive transition to the LHOS with paste fill method. The LHOS without backfill stopes are mined in a top-down sequence. Based on the ore width, access orientation, and the location of historical or planned voids, stopes are mined either transversely or longitudinally.
Transitioning the mining method from LHOS without backfill to LHOS with backfill (paste fill), within The transverse Primary / Secondary / Tertiary mining method (LHOS without backfill) is restricted to the WF3 zone.
All stopes and historic voids that are paste filled require an engineered barricade (bulkhead) at all access points prior to paste fill placement. The void is filled with cemented paste delivered by a piping network from the paste fill plant. The paste fill plant will be located on the surface and will use booster pumps where necessary to pump paste fill to the more remote voids.
The preferred materials handling system was identified to be trucking via a new surface decline with a larger profile than currently developed. This will facilitate direct ore haulage from the WF3 zone to a surface tip point utilizing larger capacity and more efficient trucks (60 t) with reduced fleet numbers. Ore sourced from the balance of the resources (EOF, SF3, SOF, and BME) will be hauled to the existing Krupp tip point as per the current haulage plan using the 30 t truck fleet. Waste from WF3 will be hauled and tipped into stope voids as per current waste-handling practice.
Components of the trucking decline operation comprise:
• Surface primary crusher station;
• 4.1 km trucking decline with larger profile (6.0 m by 6.0 m) to suit 60 t truck fleet;
• Underground materials handling infrastructure.
Ore from WF3 will be hauled to a new surface primary crusher station (truck tip and crusher) with conveyor discharge to the secondary screening section of the existing surface crusher installation.
Flow Sheet:
Crusher / Mill Type | Model | Size | Power | Quantity |
Gyratory crusher
|
.......................
|
66"
|
|
1
|
Cone crusher
|
.......................
|
5.5'
|
|
1
|
Mobile jaw crusher
|
|
30" x 42"
|
|
1
|
Ball mill
|
|
12' x 12'
|
1000 kW
|
1
|
Regrind
|
|
|
185 kW
|
3
|
Regrind
|
|
|
90 kW
|
1
|
Summary:
The current Rosh Pinah concentrator utilizes a conventional three-stage crushing and ball milling
circuit.
The ROM ore is hauled from the underground production areas over a distance of approximately 4.2 km to the ore tipping location (Krupp) located some 320 m below surface. From the Krupp and primary crushing station, located underground, the ore is conveyed into the beneficiation plant through a series of conveyor belts for further crushing, screening, and grinding.
The ROM ore is fed through a grizzly to the primary jaw crusher at a rate of 140 tonnes per hour (tph) to 160 tph. The product is conveyed to the surface onto the primary screen where the oversize (+28 mm) is sent to the secondary cone crusher. Product from the crusher is sent back to the primary screen in closed circuit configuration. The undersize (-28 mm) from the primary screen is sent to the primary stockpile.
The secondary screen is fed from the primary stockpile at a rate of 100 tph to 110 tph. The oversize (+8 mm) is sent to the tertiary gyro-disc crusher. Crusher product is sent back to the secondary screen in closed circuit configuration. The undersize (-8 mm) from the secondary screen is sent to the mill feed stockpiles that act as a buffer between the milling and crushing circuit.
From the mill feed stockpiles, the ball mill is fed at a rate of 85 tph to 90 tph solids feed. The ball mill is a 1,000 kW Osborn ball mill measuring 12 ft by 12 ft.
.
Processing
- Crush & Screen plant
- Dewatering
- Flotation
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The Rosh Pinah processing plant, which has been in continuous production since 1969, uses similar proven technologies to most other lead-zinc base metal beneficiation circuits. It currently comprises of crushing and grinding followed by sequential flotation to produce separate lead and zinc concentrates. Rosh Pinah currently treats 0.68 to 0.71 Mtpa and produces circa 40 to 60 ktpa of zinc as flotation concentrate and circa 4.5 to 7.5 ktpa of lead as flotation concentrate.
The process includes conventional size reduction and mineral beneficiation unit processes. The current process plant includes the following unit operations:
• ROM ore feed tip (located underground);
• Primary crushing (located underground);
• Screening;
• Secondary crushing;
• Tertiary crushing;
• Stockpile and reclaim;
• Single stage ball milling with classification cyclones;
• Lead rougher and scavenger flotation;
• Lead concentrate regrinding and cleaner flot ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Zinc
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 86.8 | 83.5 | 87.7 | 85.9 |
Zinc
|
Head Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 9.2 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 8.6 |
Zinc
|
Concentrate Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 47.7 | 50.1 | 50.6 | 51.9 |
Lead
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 64.7 | 63.2 | 73.8 | 73.9 |
Lead
|
Head Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 1 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
Lead
|
Concentrate Grade, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 30.5 | 41.7 | 48.2 | 50.2 |
Silver
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 46.8 | 49 | 45 | 35.6 |
Silver
|
Head Grade, oz/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 0.5 | 22.8 | 34.8 | 36.7 |
Silver
|
Concentrate Grade, oz/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | 8.8 | 520 | 590 | 493 |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | ......  | | 30 | 27.5 | 29.9 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | | | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Gold
|
Concentrate Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | ......  | | | 3.1 | 3.4 |
Reserves at December 31, 2021:
The Rosh Pinah Underground Mine Mineral Reserve estimate is reported based on planned stopes with a net smelter return cut-off value of $50/tonne, with average metal prices of: $1.17/lb zinc, $1.00/lb lead and $24.13/oz silver.
The Rosh Pinah Underground Mine Mineral Resource estimate is reported based on a cut-off grade of 4% ZnEq.
Category | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
7.5 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.64 %
|
933 M lbs
|
Proven
|
7.5 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.29 %
|
213 M lbs
|
Proven
|
7.5 Mt
|
Silver
|
20.1 g/t
|
4,844 koz
|
Probable
|
9.25 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.9 %
|
1,202 M lbs
|
Probable
|
9.25 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.24 %
|
253 M lbs
|
Probable
|
9.25 Mt
|
Silver
|
19.45 g/t
|
5,781 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
16.74 Mt
|
Zinc
|
5.78 %
|
2,135 M lbs
|
Proven & Probable
|
16.74 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.26 %
|
466 M lbs
|
Proven & Probable
|
16.74 Mt
|
Silver
|
19.74 g/t
|
10,625 koz
|
Measured
|
10.84 Mt
|
Zinc
|
7.34 %
|
1,755 M lbs
|
Measured
|
10.84 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.87 %
|
447 M lbs
|
Measured
|
10.84 Mt
|
Silver
|
28.3 g/t
|
9,865 koz
|
Indicated
|
9.1 Mt
|
Zinc
|
7.42 %
|
1,488 M lbs
|
Indicated
|
9.1 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.79 %
|
359 M lbs
|
Indicated
|
9.1 Mt
|
Silver
|
27.8 g/t
|
8,132 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
19.94 Mt
|
Zinc
|
7.38 %
|
3,244 M lbs
|
Measured & Indicated
|
19.94 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.83 %
|
805 M lbs
|
Measured & Indicated
|
19.94 Mt
|
Silver
|
27.71 g/t
|
17,764 koz
|
Inferred
|
0.78 Mt
|
Zinc
|
8.09 %
|
139 M lbs
|
Inferred
|
0.78 Mt
|
Lead
|
1.41 %
|
24 M lbs
|
Inferred
|
0.78 Mt
|
Silver
|
47.36 g/t
|
1,183 koz
|
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
News:
Aerial view:
- Subscription is required.