Overview
Status | Inactive / Suspended |
Mine Type | Open Pit |
Commodities |
|
Mining Method |
|
Processing |
- Carbon re-activation kiln
- Wet Screening
- Electric furnace
- Smelting
- Flotation
- Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
- Concentrate leach
- Carbon in leach (CIL)
- Carbon adsorption
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
- Cyanide (reagent)
|
Mine Life | 2031 |
Operational control of Kumtor has been fully transferred to an external management team, led by Tengiz Bolturuk. On May 17, 2021, the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic (the "Government") approved a legal process to enable it to assume control of the operations.
Although the Centerra remains the rightful legal owner of Kumtor Gold Company (KGC), it cannot effectively exercise power over any relevant activities or affect the returns of the Kumtor Mine. As a result of the loss of control, the Centerra has deconsolidated the results of the Kumtor Mine, recognizing a loss on the change of control of $926.4 million in the second quarter of 2021, ascribed no value to the Centerra’s interest in KGC and is accounting for the Kumtor Mine as a discontinued operation. |
Latest News | Centerra Gold Announces Agreement With Kyrgyzaltyn and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic April 4, 2022 |
Source:
p. 10
Deposit Type
- Breccia pipe / Stockwork
- Vein / narrow vein
- Orogenic
- Mesothermal
- Metamorphic hosted
- Sediment-hosted
Summary:
Orogenic gold mineralization at Kumtor is structurally dependent and formed penecontemporaneous with shearing on major faults through the system. Alteration associated with gold mineralization formed during several stages and at relatively high temperatures. The deposit is present along a continental-scale, amagmatic shallow-dipping (~25°-45°) structure cutting phyllite strata along the Kumtor shear zone. This structure is situated at the margin of the Middle Tien Shan terrain near the Nikolaev line – the Kyrgyz-Kazakh micro-continental suture.
Major features of the Kumtor Deposit compare favourably with those in prominent orogenic gold deposits present in black shale flysch strata such as Muruntau (Uzbekistan), Sukhoi Log, Olympiada and Natalka (Russia). However, contrasting features with these deposits include host-rock composition and age, age and grade of host rock metamorphism, age of mineralization, and presence or absence of magmatic rock, as well as degree and composition of associated alkaline metasomatism (sodium versus potassium). Nonetheless, the main distinctive feature of the Kumtor deposit versus other orogenic gold deposits hosted by black shales is absence of anomalous arsenic (>100 ppm) in mineralized rock. Another unusual feature of Kumtor mineralization is its large quantity of CaO gains, together with sulphur and CO2. This has resulted in a major presence of abundant MnFe-carbonate minerals in mineralized rock, accompanied with a relatively reduced presence of hydrothermal quartz. All these features are striking characteristics of gold mineralization at Kumtor.
The ore-forming structure at Kumtor is confined to a continent-continent orogenic collision zone during renewal of the Middle Tien Shan terrain’s movement towards the Kyrgyz-Kazakh micro-continent. This coincided with subduction of the South Tien Shan crust under the Middle Tien Shan crust, including crustal shortening of the latter from south to north. This wedge of continental crust, thus doubly impinged, is inferred to include upwelling of the lithosphere along deeply penetrating structures that then channelled fluids associated with mineralization along the trace of throughgoing structures.
Gold mineralization is distributed with varying intensity over 12 km along the trend, and it is most intensely concentrated in the Central Deposit and less so in the Southwest and Sarytor Deposits.
CENTRAL DEPOSIT
The entire sequence of host sedimentary and metamorphic rocks composing the Central Deposit has been divided into a number of structural compositional complexes (Units) and are characterized by the following features:
- Unit 0 is present in the northern part of the Central Deposit in the Kumtor Lower Thrust and is represented by fractured rocks of varied composition — breccia, conglomerate breccia linked together by gruss-formed clay and clay aggregate.
- Unit 1 in the hanging wall of the Black Thrust and below the Kumtor Upper Thrust includes carbonaceous and graphitic rock. The unit is dominantly composed of black carbonaceous phyllite that is significantly deformed.
- Unit 2 is in the hanging wall of the Kumtor Upper Thrust and includes dark grey and black carbonaceous and carbon-containing phyllite. Its rocks are almost universally hydrothermally altered ranging from altered phyllite to quartz-feldspar-carbonate altered rock, in which there are no signs of the original primary rock left in the latter.
- Unit 3 is characteristic of the eastern part of the area and it sits above Unit 2 in the hanging wall of the Lysyi Fault. The unit is composed of phyllite and carbonate-containing phyllite of dark grey colour including interlayered strata of carbon-containing phyllite and tillite-like conglomerate.
SOUTHWEST DEPOSIT
Gold mineralization in the Southwest Deposit primarily is limited to formations assigned to Unit 2 in the hanging wall of the Kumtor Upper Fault. Boundaries of the mineralized rock are marked by a tectonic crush zone of black clay gouge at a contact with surrounding barren phyllite. Footwall contacts are generally sharp and clearly defined. In the hanging wall, the boundary is sometimes difficult to identify. Mostly due to shallow dips of bedding in mineralized rock, mineralization boundaries are somewhat contorted both in their strike and dip. In addition, distribution of mineralized rock within its envelope is very inconsistent. Though distribution of gold enrichment is depicted schematically in cross-sections along footwall and hanging wall contacts, this is not a typical presence.
SARYTOR DEPOSIT
The Sarytor Deposit structure is characterized by thrust faults of various ages. A thick thrust zone (100 to 250 m) extends through the entire deposit from east to west and has a southeast-sub-latitudinal orientation (50°/145° and 45°/180°). It is poorly defined on the surface due to the obstruction by drifts, but it can be well traced down dip in drill holes. The zone contains brecciated, mylonitised, carbonized rocks from Unit 2 with irregularly shaped and random blocks of less disturbed rocks and mineralized altered rock. It appears more commonly as a tectonic mélange with black clay matrix and large boudins of various rock types. The lower and upper contacts of the thrust zone are distinguished by shallow dipping structures with black slick surfaces including the most intensely mylonitised and crushed phyllites in the entire thrust zone. The internal structure of the thrust zone is complex and has many crushed rocks. Most of these highly deformed rocks conform consistently with the overall dip of the thrust zone.
NORHTEAST DEPOSIT
The Northeast Deposit includes several steeply dipping, narrow tabular mineralized bodies confined largely to Units 0 and 1 in the footwall of the Lysyi Thrust. The deposit includes both sulphide and oxide mineralization, the latter was known historically on the surface and was encountered at depth by recent drilling. Sulphide gold mineralization in the Northeast Deposit mostly is associated with highly sheared tectonic breccia marked by carbonaceous phyllite of Unit 1 and Unit 2 including pyrite-carbonatequartz veinlets and veins, mineralized blocks of granular quartz impregnated with carbonaceous material, rhyolite and carbonaceous-siliceous shale, as well as mineralized dolomite and limestone.
Northeast Deposit includes variably altered chlorite-sericite shale as well as. Its upper part is composed of quartz-albite-carbonate assemblages including relics of carbon-containing chloritesericite shale, within which there are discrete layers of hydrothermal breccia of pyrite-feldsparcarbonate with gold grades as much as 1.0 to 3.0 g/t. Its lower part is the most productive and it is localized in sheared rock including well-developed pyrite-feldspar-quartz-carbonate assemblages including relics of carbonatized chlorite-sericite shale, with some scheelite and barite. Gold grades are as much as 2.0 to 6.0 g/t.
Quartz-albite-carbonate assemblages and quartz veins include bands of host rock and have 1.0 to 3.0 g/t Au.
Potential of the Kumtor District and Kumtor Gold Trend outside of the known deposits is linked primarily to inferred extensions of gold mineralization to the southwest and northeast, respectively in the Akbel – Bordoo and Petrov Lake areas. Some additional potential also could be expected in any subsidiary or subparallel mineralized trends as described below. A regional airborne electromagnetic survey conducted during 2019 yielded a number of broad target areas that warrant additional focused district-scale exploration efforts. The Kumtor trend resides in a linear northeast-trending, roughly 2.5–km wide belt of low resistivity or increased conductivity.
Summary:
Mining is carried out using conventional open pit drill, blast, load, and haul operations. There are WRSFs currently in use and planned to be used for the remaining mine life, all of which require continuous management due to underlying foundation conditions and/or water inflow from adjacent glaciers. The Central, Southwest and Sarytor open pit rock masses are structurally complex with many faults and relatively weak rock mass, particularly the Central Pit; coupled with adjacent glaciers, this makes for a relatively complex mining situation requiring continuous geotechnical and water management. Over the remaining mine life Kumtor plans to mine 60.2 Mt ore and 1,641 Mt waste, have a peak mining rate of 205.6 Mt per year, average strip ratio of 27.2 waste:ore tonnes and continue until 2031.
In 2019, Centerra temporarily suspended open pit mining operations at Kumtor after a failure event at the Lysyi Valley WRSF. Due to the need to focus on search and rescue efforts as well as stabilize the WRSF, the operation was halted for one month. It is noted that the failure occurred in the then primary WRSF location causing further delay. In 2020, Kumtor Mine received all necessary approvals and permits to recommence operations and continue ore processing.
Open pit mining is performed using conventional open pit bulk mining methods with hydraulic shovels and mining trucks on 10-m benches.
The top mining elevation in the current ultimate pit design is at 4,520 m, and the deepest part of the final pit excavation will be at 3,510 m in the southwest part of the Central Pit. The crushing plant to which ore is delivered is at an approximate elevation of 4,050 m. Waste haulage profiles are a combination of both uphill and downhill hauling. Management of the entire mining fleet (including auxiliary equipment) is undertaken using a MineSense dispatch system.
Flow Sheet:
Crusher / Mill Type | Model | Size | Power | Quantity |
Gyratory crusher
|
|
|
|
1
|
Horizontal shaft impact crusher (HSI)
|
.......................
|
|
2.6 MW
|
1
|
Pebble crusher
|
|
|
|
1
|
SAG mill
|
|
9.14m x 4.27m
|
6.34 MW
|
1
|
Ball mill
|
|
5.49m x 7.92m
|
4.1 MW
|
1
|
Vertical mill / Tower
|
|
|
|
2
|
Summary:
A gyratory crusher reduces ore to minus 200 mm. The ore is then fed to a coarse ore stockpile from which it is reclaimed for grinding. The stockpile has a nominal capacity of 100,000 tonnes and a live capacity of approximately 15,000 tonnes. Primary grinding is done in a 9.14-m diameter x 4.27-m long 6,340-kW, semi-autogenous grinding (SAG) mill operating in closed circuit with a pebble crusher and a ball mill feed sizing screen. Secondary grinding is achieved in a 5.49-m diameter x 7.92-m long 4,100-kW ball mill in closed circuit with 660-mm diameter hydro-cyclones.
Processing
- Carbon re-activation kiln
- Wet Screening
- Electric furnace
- Smelting
- Flotation
- Agitated tank (VAT) leaching
- Concentrate leach
- Carbon in leach (CIL)
- Carbon adsorption
- Solvent Extraction & Electrowinning
- Cyanide (reagent)
Flow Sheet:
Summary:
The process plant was originally designed with a capacity to process 4.8 Mtpy ore and is currently operating at 6.3 Mtpy.
The ore to be processed is managed through a number of stockpiles that receive ore with different metallurgical characteristics and of different grade ranges, as determined by grade-control data, and thus allows blending of the process feed for optimum gold recovery.
Hydro-cyclone overflow at 80% passing 150 microns gravitates to the flotation circuit, comprising 2 parallel banks of 9, 42 cubic metres (m3) naturally aspirated flotation cells. The flotation concentrate is thickened in a 15.2-m diameter concentrate wash thickener.
Ultra-fine grinding of flotation concentrate is completed in two stages. Flotation concentrate from the wash thickener underflow is first re-ground to 90% passing 20 microns in a 5.49-m diameter x 7.92-m long, 4,100-kW ball mill in closed circuit with-150 mm diameter hydro-?yclones. After thickening in the 15 ........

Recoveries & Grades:
Commodity | Parameter | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
Gold
|
Recovery Rate, %
| ......  | ......  | 79.3 | 79.1 | 79.2 | 78.8 | 78 |
Gold
|
Head Grade, g/t
| ......  | ......  | 3.29 | 3.58 | 3.44 | 3.57 | 3.9 |
Production:
Commodity | Product | Units | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
Gold
|
Payable metal
|
koz
| ...... ^ | ......  | | | | | |
Gold
|
Metal in doré
|
koz
| | | ......  | 535 | 563 | 551 | 521 |
^ Guidance / Forecast.
- Subscription is required.
Operational Metrics:
Metrics | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
Daily mining rate
| ......  | ......  | | 484 kt | | |
Total tonnes mined
| ......  | ......  | 156,439 kt | 180,331 kt | 181,878 kt | 144,399 kt |
Ore tonnes mined
| ......  | ......  | 10,970 kt | 7,356 kt | 5,084 kt | 8,911 kt |
Daily production capacity
| ......  | ......  | | | | |
Tonnes processed
| ......  | ......  | | | | |
Tonnes milled
| ......  | ......  | 5,968 kt | 6,325 kt | 6,246 kt | 6,303 kt |
Daily milling capacity
| ......  | ......  | | | | |
^ Guidance / Forecast.
- Subscription is required.
Reserves at December 31, 2020:
The open pit mineral reserves and resources are estimated based on a cut-off grade of 0.85 g/t Au for the Central Pit and 1.0 g/t Au for the Southwest and Sarytor deposits.
Underground mineral resources are based on a cutoff grade of 4.9 g/t Au.
Category | OreType | Tonnage | Commodity | Grade | Contained Metal |
Proven
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
10.693 Mt
|
Gold
|
1.42 g/t
|
487 koz
|
Probable
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
59.613 Mt
|
Gold
|
2.88 g/t
|
5,525 koz
|
Proven & Probable
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
70.306 Mt
|
Gold
|
2.66 g/t
|
6,013 koz
|
Measured
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
9.478 Mt
|
Gold
|
3.44 g/t
|
1,048 koz
|
Indicated
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
16.054 Mt
|
Gold
|
2.39 g/t
|
1,232 koz
|
Measured & Indicated
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
25.532 Mt
|
Gold
|
2.78 g/t
|
2,280 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (OP)
|
20.864 Mt
|
Gold
|
1.97 g/t
|
1,324 koz
|
Inferred
|
In-Situ (UG)
|
13.1 Mt
|
Gold
|
7.46 g/t
|
3,141 koz
|
HME Type | Model | Quantity | Ref. Date |
Dozer
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Dozer (rubber tire)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Drill
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Drill
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Drill (blasthole)
|
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Excavator
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Excavator
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Grader
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Grader
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Loader
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Loader
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Loader
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Shovel (hydraulic)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Shovel (hydraulic)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Truck (haul)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Truck (haul)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Jun 30, 2020
|
Truck (water)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
Truck (water)
|
.......................
|
.......................
|
Nov 1, 2018
|
- Subscription is required.
Corporate Filings & Presentations:
- Subscription is required.
News:
News | Date |
Centerra Gold Announces Agreement With Kyrgyzaltyn and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic
|
April 4, 2022
|
Centerra Gold Records Net Earnings from Continuing Operations of $33.0 million or $0.11 per Common Share, Adjusted Net Earnings from Continuing Operations...
|
August 10, 2021
|
Centerra Gold Brings Additional Claims in Arbitration Against the Kyrgyz Republic and Names Kyrgyzaltyn JSC as a Co-Respondent over Seizure of the Kumtor Mine
|
July 7, 2021
|
Kyrgyz Republic Provides Status Update on Kumtor Mine
|
May 21, 2021
|
Kyrgyz Republic Takes Steps to Assume Temporary Control of Kumtor Mine
|
May 18, 2021
|
Centerra Gold Responds to Latest Developments in the Kyrgyz Republic
|
May 17, 2021
|
Centerra Gold Announces 2020 Year-End Mineral Reserves and Resources, Kumtor Technical Report and Fourth Quarter Exploration Update
|
February 24, 2021
|
Centerra Gold Reports Two Missing Employees After Significant Rock Movement in Lysii Waste Rock Dump at Kumtor
|
December 1, 2019
|
Aerial view:
- Subscription is required.